Abstract
This paper presents an in depth study of an interesting analogy, recently proposed by Prathap (Scientometrics 87(3):515–524, 2011a), between the evolution of thermodynamic and bibliometric systems. The goal is to highlight some weaknesses and clarify some “dark sides” in the conceptual framework of this analogy, discussing the formal validity and practical meaning of the concepts of Energy, Exergy and Entropy in bibliometrics. Specifically, this analogy highlights the following major criticalities: (1) the definitions of E and X are controversial, (2) the equivalence classes of E and X are questionable, (3) the parallel between the evolution of thermodynamic and bibliometric systems is forced, (4) X is a non-monotonic performance indicator, and (5) in bibliometrics the condition of “thermodynamic perfection” is questionable. Argument is supported by many analytical demonstrations and practical examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h-index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h-index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 830–837.
Dincer, I., & Cengel, Y. A. (2001). Energy, entropy and exergy concepts and their roles in thermal engineering. Entropy, 3, 116–149.
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurements. Springer: Berlin, ISBN: 9783540732112.
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2010). Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 494–504.
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2011a). Criticism on the hg-index. Scientometrics, 86(2), 339–346.
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2011b). Bibliometric positioning of scientific manufacturing journals: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 86(2), 463–485.
Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2011c). Influence of database mistakes on journal citation analysis: Remarks on the paper by Franceschini and Maisano, QREI (2010). Quality and Reliability Engineering International. doi:10.1002/qre.1174.
Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index-A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315–321.
Henzinger, M., Sunol, J., & Weber, I. (2010). The stability of the h-index. Scientometrics, 84(2), 465–479.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84(1), 153–165.
Prathap, G. (2011a). The Energy-Exergy-Entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87(3), 515–524.
Prathap, G. (2011b). A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel–Shubert model for the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 992–994.
Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 179–184.
Woeginger, G. J. (2008). An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56(2), 224–232.
Ye, F. Y. (2011). A unification of three models for the h-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 205–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. On the analogy between the evolution of thermodynamic and bibliometric systems: a breakthrough or just a bubble?. Scientometrics 89, 315–327 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0444-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0444-4