Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between high-quality journals and conferences in computer vision

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In computer science, as opposed to many other disciplines, papers published in conference and workshop proceedings count as formal publications when evaluating the scholarship of an academic. We consider the relationship between high quality journals and conferences in the computer vision (CV) subfield of computer science. We determined that 30% of papers in the top-3 CV journals base their work on top-3 conference papers by the same authors (which we call priors (See “Methods” section for the definition of a prior)). Journal papers with priors are significantly more cited than journal papers without priors. Also the priors themselves are cited more than other papers from the conferences. For a period of 3–5 years after the journal paper publication, the priors receive more citations than the follow-up journal paper. After that period, the journal paper starts receiving most of the citations. Furthermore, we found that having the prior conference paper did not make it any easier (faster) to publish in a journal. We also surveyed journal authors and based on their answers and the priors analysis, we discovered that authors seem to be divided into different groups depending on their preferred method of publication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Top conferences and journals for these areas from: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/?SearchDomain=2.

  2. Data computed from DBLP http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db.

  3. Acceptance rates collected from: http://www.adaptivebox.net/CILib/CICON_stat.html.

  4. According to correspondence with the editors of the respective journals for CVIU and TPAMI and the publisher for IJCV.

  5. http://scholar.google.com.

  6. http://academic.research.microsoft.com/?SearchDomain=2.

  7. A regular paper is one that is not classified as a short paper as can be found in TPAMI and IJCV, nor classified as a note as can be found in CVIU. We also did not consider papers of special sections or issues of the journals since these were reprints or extended works of a particular workshop or conference.

  8. Same authors is defined as at least 50% of the conference paper’s authors are also authors of the journal paper.

  9. http://www.R-project.org.

References

  • Franceschet, M. (2010). The role of conference publications in computer science: A bibliometric view. Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M. (2011). The skewness of computer science. Information Processing and Management, 47, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2011). The first italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective. Journal of Infometrics, 5(2), 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., & Cunningham, P. (2010). Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, A., McCain, K. W., Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2001). Scholarly publishing in the internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Information Processing and Management, 37, 661–675.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., & McKim, G. (1999). Scholarly communication and the continuum of electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 50(10), 890–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, W., Gonalves, M., Laender, A., & Ziviani, N. (2010). Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations. Scientometrics, 83, 133–155. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0078-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesi, M., Owen, J. M. (2008). From conference to journal publication: How conference papers in software engineering are extended for publication in journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 59(5), 816–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, L. (2010). The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in computer science and engineering. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1(2), 1–7.

  • Stringer, M. J., Sales-Pardo, M., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2008). Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1683,02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., de Oliveira, H. P., & Anido, R. (2011). Patterns of bibliographic references in the acm published papers. Information Processing & Management, 47(1), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eckmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckmann, M., Rocha, A. & Wainer, J. Relationship between high-quality journals and conferences in computer vision. Scientometrics 90, 617–630 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0527-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0527-2

Keywords

Navigation