Abstract
In the competitive business environment, early identification of technological opportunities is crucial for technology strategy formulation and research and development planning. There exist previous studies that identify technological directions or areas from a broad view for technological opportunities, while few studies have researched a way to detect distinctive patents that can act as new technological opportunities at the individual patent level. This paper proposes a method of detecting new technological opportunities by using subject–action–object (SAO)-based semantic patent analysis and outlier detection. SAO structures are syntactically ordered sentences that can be automatically extracted by natural language processing of patent text; they explicitly show the structural relationships among technological components in a patent, and thus encode key findings of inventions and the expertise of inventors. Therefore, the proposed method allows quantification of structural dissimilarities among patents. We use outlier detection to identify unusual or distinctive patents in a given technology area; some of these outlier patents may represent new technological opportunities. The proposed method is illustrated using patents related to organic photovoltaic cells. We expect that this method can be incorporated into the research and development process for early identification of technological opportunities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251–259.
Aleskerov, E., Freisleben, B., & Rao, B. (2002). Cardwatch: A neural network based database mining system for credit card fraud detection. In IEEE (pp. 220–226).
Altschuller, G. (1984). Creativity as an exact science: The theory of the solution of inventive problems. New York: Gordon and Breach.
Barnett, V., Lewis, T., & Abeles, F. (1979). Outliers in statistical data. Physics Today, 32, 73.
Bergmann, I., Butzke, D., Walter, L., Fuerste, J., Moehrle, M., & Erdmann, V. (2008). Evaluating the risk of patent infringement by means of semantic patent analysis: The case of DNA chips. R&D Management, 38(5), 550–562.
Cascini, G., Fantechi, A., & Spinicci, E. (2004). Natural language processing of patents and technical documentation. Document Analysis Systems, VI, 508–520.
Cascini, G., Russo, D., & Zini, M. (2007). Computer-aided patent analysis: Finding invention peculiarities. In N. Leon-Rovira (Ed.), Trends in computer aided innovation (pp. 167–178). Boston: Springer.
Cascini, G., & Zini, M. (2008). Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 277, 31–42.
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3), 1–58.
Choi, S., Lim, J., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2010). Patent function network analysis: A function based approach for analyzing patent information. In IAMOT2010, Cairo, Egypt.
Christensen, C., & Leslie, D. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Franses, P., Kloek, T., & Lucas, A. (1998). Outlier robust analysis of long-run marketing effects for weekly scanning data. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1–2), 293–315.
Fujii, A., Iwayama, M., & Kando, N. (2007). Introduction to the special issue on patent processing. Information Processing & Management, 43(5), 1149–1153.
Gerken, J., Moehrle, M., & Walter, L. (2010). Patents as an information source for product forecasting: Insights from a longitudinal study in the automotive industry. In The R&D management conference 2010, Manchester, England.
Hodge, V., & Austin, J. (2004). A survey of outlier detection methodologies. Artificial Intelligence Review, 22(2), 85–126.
Karki, M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269–272.
Kruskal, J. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129.
Lee, S., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2009). An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 29(6–7), 481–497.
Leung, K., & Leckie, C. (2005). Unsupervised anomaly detection in network intrusion detection using clusters (pp. 333–342). Sydney: Australian Computer Society, Inc.
Lin, D. (2010). Minipar. http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~lindek/minipar.htm. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.
Mann, D. (2002). Hands-on systematic innovation. Leper: CREAX Press.
Mann, D. (2003). Better technology forecasting using systematic innovation methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(8), 779–795.
Miller, G. (1995). Wordnet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.
Moehrle, M., & Geritz, A. (2004). Developing acquisition strategies based on patent maps. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on management of technology (pp. 1–9), Washington, DC, USA.
Moehrle, M., Walter, L., Geritz, A., & Muller, S. (2005). Patent-based inventor profiles as a basis for human resource decisions in research and development. R&D Management, 35(5), 513–524.
Mogee, M., & Kolar, R. (1994). International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6(4), 485–504.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147–155.
Park, B. (2002). An outlier robust GARCH model and forecasting volatility of exchange rate returns. Journal of Forecasting, 21(5), 381–393.
Radauer, A., & Walter, L. (2010). Elements of good practice for providers of publicly funded patent information services for SMEs-selected and amended results of a benchmarking exercise. World Patent Information, 32(3), 237–245.
Resnik, P. (1999). Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11(95), 130.
Savransky, S. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving. Boca Raton: CRC.
Schuh, G., & Grawatsch, M. (2004). TRIZ-based technology intelligence. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on management of technology, Washington, DC, USA.
Sekar, R., Gupta, A., Frullo, J., Shanbhag, T., Tiwari, A., Yang, H., et al. (2002). Specification-based anomaly detection: A new approach for detecting network intrusions. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on computer and communications security, New York, USA.
Simpson, T., & Dao, T. (2005). Wordnet-based semantic similarity measurement. http://www.codeproject.com/KB/string/semanticsimilaritywordnet.aspx. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.
Siris, V., & Papagalou, F. (2006). Application of anomaly detection algorithms for detecting SYN flooding attacks. Computer Communications, 29(9), 1433–1442.
Stanford. (2010). The Stanford parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.
Yoon, B. (2008). On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1–2), 124–135.
Yoon, J., Choi, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Invention property-function network analysis of patents: A case of silicon-based thin film solar cells. Scientometrics, 86(3), 687–703.
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2011a). Generation of patent maps using SAO-based semantic patent similarity. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 10(1), 19–27.
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2011b). Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks. Scientometrics, 88(1), 213–228.
Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). Morphology analysis approach for technology forecasting. In 2004 IEEE international engineering management conference (Vol. 2, pp. 566–570), Singapore.
Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2005). A systematic approach for identifying technology opportunities: Keyword-based morphology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 145–160.
Yoon, B., Yoon, C., & Park, Y. (2002). On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Management, 32(4), 291–300.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2009-0088379).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, J., Kim, K. Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using semantic patent analysis and outlier detection. Scientometrics 90, 445–461 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0543-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0543-2
Keywords
- Technological opportunity
- Outlier detection
- Patent mining
- Subject–action–object (SAO) structure
- Semantic patent similarity
- Multidimensional scaling (MDS)
- Research and development (R&D) planning