Abstract
A well-designed and comprehensive citation index for the social sciences and humanities has many potential uses, but has yet to be realised. Significant parts of the scholarly production in these areas are not published in international journals, but in national scholarly journals, in book chapters or in monographs. The potential for covering these literatures more comprehensively can now be investigated empirically using a complete publication output data set from the higher education sector of an entire country (Norway). We find that while the international journals in the social sciences and humanities are rather small and more dispersed in specialties, representing a large but not unlimited number of outlets, the domestic journal publishing, as well as book publishing on both the international and domestic levels, show a concentration of many publications in few publication channels. These findings are promising for a more comprehensive coverage of the social sciences and humanities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This article is an extended version of our paper at the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) in Durban 2011 (Sivertsen and Larsen 2011).
References
Adams, J., & Testa, J. (2011). Thomson reuters book citation index. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011, the 13th conference of the international society for scientometrics and infometrics, Durban, South Africa, July 4–7 2011 (Vol. 1, pp. 13–18). Leiden: Leiden University and University of Zululand.
Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327–342.
Dolan, C. (2007). Feasibility study: The evaluation and benchmarking of humanities research in Europe. HERA, Humanities in the European research area (http://www.heranet.info).
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing—Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2009). Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities—A European scoping project. Available: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/grundlagen_dfg_foerderung/informationen_fachwissenschaften/geisteswissenschaften/annex_1_en.pdf (Annex 1 of Martin et al. 2010).
Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 473–496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35–48.
Martin, B., Tang, P., Morgan, M., Glanzel, W., Hornbostel, S., Lauer, G., et al. (2010) Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities—A European scoping project. Research report produced for DFG, ESRC, AHRC, NWO, ANR and ESF. Available: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/grundlagen_dfg_foerderung/informationen_fachwissenschaften/geisteswissenschaften/esf_report_final_100309.pdf.
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.
Schneider, J. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364–378.
Sivertsen, G. (2006). A bibliometric model for performance based budgeting of research institutions. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on science and technology indicators, 7–9 September 2006, Leuven, Belgium (pp. 133–135). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven—Steunpunt O&O Statistieken.
Sivertsen, G. (2008). Experiences with a bibliometric model for performance based funding of research institutions. In J. Gorraiz & E. Schiebel (Eds.), Excellence and emergence. A new challenge for the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Book of abstracts. 10th International conference on science and technology indicators. Vienna, Austria. 17–20 September 2008 (pp. 126–128). Vienna (AUT): Austrian Research Centers GmbH.
Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6(1), 22–28.
Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2011). What to include in a social sciences and humanites citation index—An empirical analysis. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—The 13th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Durban, South Africa, 4–7 July 2011 (pp. 775–782).
Sivertsen, G., Ossenblok, T., & Engels, T. (2011). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the web of science. A comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–2009). In ENID/STI conference on actors and networks in European Science, Rome 7–9 September 2011. Book of Abstracts, ENID (www.enid-europe.org), (pp 168–170).
Acknowledgments
An extended version of a paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban (South Africa), 4–7 July 2011 (Sivertsen and Larsen 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sivertsen, G., Larsen, B. Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics 91, 567–575 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3