Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the discussion paper on this issue, Vanclay (2011) describes and uncovers several weaknesses of the JIF based on a thorough literature review and detailed empirical analyses. In this short comment we would like to add the results of two studies to the discussion around the JIF. In these studies we investigated the effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its JIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bornmann, L., Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H.-D. (2011). The effect of a two-stage publication process on the journal impact factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Scientometrics, 86, 93–97. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0250-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1995). The sweet and sour of journal citation rates. On a source of error in computing impact factors. The Chemical Intelligencer, 1, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. A. (2006). Accuracy of cited references: the role of citation databases. College & Research Libraries, 67(4), 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, T., & Pöschl, U. (2006). Systems: an open, two-stage peer-review journal. The editors of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics explain their journal’s approach. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html. Accessed 26 June 2006.

  • Kumar, V., Upadhyay, S., & Medhi, B. (2009). Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse. Singapore Medical Journal, 50(8), 752–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W. (2001). Angewandte Chemie in light of the “Science Citation Index”. Angewandte Chemie International edition, 40(1), 139–143. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010105)40:1<139:AID-ANIE139>3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W. (2011). Special features of historical papers from the viewpoint of bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(3), 433–439. doi:10.1002/asi.21479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Reedijk, J. (1996). A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society - inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics, 37(1), 105–116. doi:10.1007/BF02093487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöschl, U. (2004). Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17(2), 105–113. doi:10.1087/095315104322958481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retzer, V., & Jurasinski, G. (2009). Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators: a protocol for incorporating complexity. Basic and Applied Ecology, 10(5), 393–400. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2008.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2011). Impact Factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Bornmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bornmann, L., Marx, W. The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor. Scientometrics 92, 277–279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0656-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0656-2

Keywords

Navigation