Abstract
Citation studies have become an important tool for understanding scientific communication processes, as they enable the identification of several characteristics of information-retrieval behavior. This study seeks to analyze citation behavior using two popular ethnobotany articles, and our analysis is guided by the following question: when an author references a work, is he pointing out the work’s theoretical contribution, or is bias a factor in citing this reference? Citation analysis reveals an interesting phenomenon, as the majority of citing texts do not consider the theoretical contributions made by the articles cited. Two possible conclusions can be drawn from this scenario: (1) citing authors read the original texts that they cite only superficially, and (2) the works cited are not read by the vast majority of people who reference them. Thus, it is clear that even with sufficient access to reference texts; ethnobotanical studies highlight elements less relevant to the research and reproduce discussions in a non-reflective manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Albuquerque, U. P. (2009). Quantitative ethnobotany or quantification in ethnobotany? Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 7, 01–03.
Albuquerque, U. P. (2010). The tyranny of the impact factor: why do we still want to be subjugated? Rodriguesia, 61, 353–358.
Albuquerque, U. P. (2011). The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process. Revista brasileira de. Farmacogosia, 21(1), 1–3.
Albuquerque, U. P., & Hanazaki, N. (2009). Five problems in current ethnobotanical research and some suggestions for strengthening them. Human Ecology (New York, N.Y.), 37, 653–661.
Albuquerque, U. P., & Lucena, R. F. P. (2005). Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia, 30(8), 506–510.
Alencar, N. L., Araújo, T. A. S., Amorim, E. L. C., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2010). The inclusion and selection of medicinal plants in traditional pharmacopoeias evidence in support of the diversification hypothesis. Economic Botany, 64, 68–79.
Alvarenga, L. (1998). Bibliometria e Arqueologia do Saber de Michel Foucault: traços de identidade teórico-metodológica. Ciência da Informação, 27(3), 1–9.
Ayres, M., Ayres, M., Jr, Ayres, D. L., & Santos, A. S. (2007). BioEstat: aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá: MCT-CNPq.
Bavelas, J. B. (1978). The social psychology of citations. Canadian Psychological Review, Calgary, 19(2), 158–163.
Bennett, B. C., & Prance, G. T. (2000). Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeia of northern South America. Economic Botany, 54(1), 90–102.
Bermudez, A., Oliveira-Miranda, M. A., & Velazquez, J. (2005). La Investigación etnobotánica sobre plantas medicinales: Una revisión de sus objetivos y enfoques actuales. Interciencia, 30(8), 453–459.
Carvalho, M. M. (1975). Análises Bibliométricas da Literatura de Química no Brasil. Ciência da Informação, 4(2), 119–141.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), 692–698.
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359–375.
Long, T.C., Errami, M., George, A.C., Sun, Z., & Garner, H.R. (2009). Responding to possible plagiarism. Science, 323(5919), 1293–1294.
Lucena, R. F. P., Araújo, E. L., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2007). Does the local availability of woody caatinga plants (Northeastern Brazil) explain their use value? Economic Botany, 61, 347–361.
Peritz, B. C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448–451.
Phillips, O., & Gentry, A. H. (1993). The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany, 47, 15–32.
Seglen, O. P. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314, 498–502.
Simkin, M. V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2003). Read before you cite! Complex Systems, 14, 269–274.
Simkin, M.V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2005). Copied citations create renowned papers? Annals of Improbable Research, 11(1), 24–27. http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0305/0305150.pdf.
Vanz, S. A. S., & Caregnato, S. E. (2003). Estudos de Citação: uma ferramenta para entender a comunicação científica. Em Questão, 9(2), 295–307.
Wren, J.D. (2005). Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet. BMJ, 330(7500), 1128.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Programa Nacional de Pós Doutorado (PNPD) of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE), by grants for postdoctoral awarded to M. A. Ramos and J. G. Melo, respectively; and also to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for productivity grant awarded to U. P. Albuquerque.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos, M.A., Melo, J.G. & Albuquerque, U.P. Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany. Scientometrics 92, 711–719 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0662-4