Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic partnership and its effect on external learning of technology descendants

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine how strategic partnership affects external learning of technology descendants from emerging markets under the context of Taiwan’s flat panel display industry. The study takes patent citation as a trail of knowledge flow, and incorporates 1,726 pairs relations of the cited and citing firms. Our empirical evidence shows positive pattern of external learning through strategic technology partnership. After controlling the quality factor of the knowledge, technology descendants do learn more from their alliance partners than other non-allied firms; particularly, trading type of partnerships characterized by the asymmetric relations appears to bring more impact. Furthermore, a focused approach in extrapolating knowledge from strategic partners seems to be the dominant practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a concept rooted from Marshall’s (1920) agglomeration economies model.

  2. http://www.digitimes.com.tw http://www.topology.com.tw/tri/.

References

  • Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2003). Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Research Policy, 32, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez Gil, M. J., & de la Fe, P. G. (1999). Strategic alliances, organisational learning and new product development: The cases of Rover and Seat. R&D Management, 29(4), 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Chen, T. (2002). Asymmetric strategic alliances: A network view. Journal of Business Research, 55, 1007–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006). In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35, 1166–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, P. (1998). On the abuse of patents as economic indicators. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(4), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D., Akinwande, A., & Sodini, C. (2003). Leading, following or cooked goose? Innovation successes and failures in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Industry and Innovation, 10(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, M., & Chow, W. (2002). Measuring the intensity of knowledge flow with patent statistics. Economics Letters, 74, 353–358.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21, 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Canal, E., Valdes-Llaneza, A., & Sanchez-Lorda, P. (2007). Technological flows and choice of joint ventures in technology alliances. Research Policy, 37(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks-efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. Organization Studies, 23(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J., van Kranenburg, H., & Osborn, R. (2003). Joint patenting amongst companies: Exploring the effect of inter-firm R&D partnering and experience. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., & Ziedonis, R. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23, 1171–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 849–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S., Lee, M. & Chen, J. (2007). Technology catch-up and patent citation: The evidence from Taiwan’s flat panel display Industry. Presented in the 80th Annual WEA Conference, San Francisco, USA.

  • Jang, S. L., Lo, S., & Chang, W. H. (2009). How do latecomers catch up with forerunners? Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies. Scientometrics, 79(3), 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. (1994). The important of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, G., Hart, J., Lenway, S., & Murtha, T. (1998). Flying geese as moving targets: Are Korean and Taiwan catching up with Japan in advanced display? Industry and Innovation, 5(1), 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principle of Economics. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2005). Strategy and crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2), 6–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C., & Peck, E. A. (2001). Introduction to linear regression analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J., Stuart, T., & Hannan, M. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1224–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polgar, L. (2003). Flat panel displays. Business Economics, 38(4), 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F., & Deeds, D. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 201–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. (2003). Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: A longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5), 428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe, M. (2002). Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 31, 1181–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., & Fox-Kean, M. (2005). Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. The American Economic Review, 95(1), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2005). World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internalization of R&D. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the data assistance provided by Agatha Lin, Che-Jung Hsu and Yunghsu Tsui. Financial support was partly provided by Taiwan’s National Science Council, Project No. 99-2410-H-343-001, No. 98-2410-H-260-061, No. 96-2415-H-002-005, and China Center, College of Social Sciences, National Taiwan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Show-Ling Jang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J.H., Lo, S., Jang, SL. et al. Strategic partnership and its effect on external learning of technology descendants. Scientometrics 92, 157–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0734-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0734-5

Keywords

Navigation