Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of number of citations to full original articles versus brief reports

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most biomedical journals accept original research articles in the form of “brief reports”. We compared the citations to full papers versus brief reports in a sample of journals on Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology, and Antimicrobial Agents. Brief reports were cited less often than full-size articles [regression coefficient: 10.94 (95 % CI: 5.19, 16.69)] even after adjustment for the journal’s impact factor. Our findings may influence decisions of editors and authors regarding brief reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, P. (2008). A longer paper gathers more citations. Nature, 455, 274–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum immunolgiae et therapiae experimentalis, 56, 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, K. S., & Hoey, J. (1999). Research letters in CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 160, 825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokker, C., McKibbon, K. A., McKinlay, R. J., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 336, 655–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes, P. V. (2010). Most reports should be brief reports. Academic Medicine, 85, 1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, M. E., & Mann, S. J. (2009). The journal impact factor denominator: defining citable (counted) items. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1107–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, U. S. (2010). Let’s keep this brief. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew E. Falagas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mavros, M.N., Bardakas, V., Rafailidis, P.I. et al. Comparison of number of citations to full original articles versus brief reports. Scientometrics 94, 203–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0752-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0752-3

Keywords

Navigation