Abstract
To the best of our knowledge, no works analyzing the participation of women as authors and editors in software engineering research publications currently exist. We have therefore followed a well-defined procedure in order to conduct an empirical study of female participation in 12 leading software engineering journals. We have analyzed the gender of the authors, editorial board members, associate editors and editors-in-chief over a two-year period in order to analyze, on the one hand, the rate of participation of women as authors and as editors in software engineering publications, and on the other, whether women are underrepresented. We have also analyzed the female distribution of authors and editors according to the geographical location of their institutions. This was done by first selecting the journals to be used as the population for data collection which then allowed us to identify female authors of papers and female editors, including the country in which their institutions are located. This eventually led to an analysis of female participation in order to understand representation rates. We analyzed 3,546 authors of 1,266 papers in 61 different countries, and 363 members of editorial boards in 30 different countries. The results of this analysis provide quantitative data concerning the participation of women as authors and editors in major software engineering journals including their distribution per country, in which important differences have been found. The results obtained were first used to compare the participation of women as authors and editors and were then used to carry out a series of simulations in order to be able to statistically confirm whether women are underrepresented. The study shows, amongst other things, that women are not underrepresented as editorial boards members and as editors-in-chief of the journals studied, although their representation as editors-in-chief is low.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the sake of simplicity we use the term ‘editors’ to refer to EBMs, AEs and EiCs, although we have made a distinction among these three categories throughout the research and in the presentation of results.
References
ACM DL. (2012). ACM Digital Library. http://portal.acm.org/dl.cfm.
Camp, T. (1997). The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM, 40(10), 103–110.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162.
DBLP. (2012). The DBLP computer science bibliography. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/index.html.
Gallivan, M. J., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). Examining the relationship between gender and the research productivity of IS faculty. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, (pp. 103–113). New York, USA: ACM Press.
Gharibyan, H. & Gunsaulus, S. (2006). Gender gap in computer science does not exist in one former Soviet republic: Results of a study. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM ITiCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, (pp. 222–226). New York, USA: ACM Press.
Goyal, A. (1996). Women in computing: historical roles, the perpetual glass ceiling, and current opportunities. Annals of the History of Computing, 18(39), 36–42.
IEEE Xplore. (2012). IEEE Xplore digital library. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
JCR. (2011). Journal Citation Reports ® of the ISI Web of Knowledge ® .
Kennedy, B. L., Lin, Y., & Dickstein, L. J. (2001). Women on the editorial boards of major journals. Academic Medicine, 76(8), 49–51.
Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.
Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4), 540–557.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). http://webcaspar.nsf.gov/.
Othman, M., & Latih, R. (2006). Women in computer science: No shortage here! Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 111–114.
Papastergiou, M. (2008). Are computer science and information technology still masculine fields? High school students’ perceptions and career choices. Computers and Education, 51(2), 594–608.
Robinson, D. H., McKay, D. W., Katayama, A. D., & Fan, A. (1998). Are women underrepresented as authors and editors of educational psychology journals? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 331–343.
Sax, L. J., Serra Hagedorn, L., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vela, B., Cáceres, P. & Cavero, J.M. Participation of women in software engineering publications. Scientometrics 93, 661–679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0774-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0774-x