Skip to main content
Log in

h-Type hybrid centrality measures for weighted networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, new centrality (collaborative) measures are proposed for a node in weighted networks in three different categories. The bibliometric indicators’ concepts (e.g., h-index and g-index) are applied to the network analysis measures in order to introduce the new centrality measures. First category of measures (i.e., l-index, al-index and gl-index) only considers a node’s neighbors’ degree. Second category of measures (i.e., h-Degree, a-Degree and g-Degree) takes into account the links’ weights of a node in a weighted network. Third category of measures (i.e., Hw-Degree, Aw-Degree and Gw-Degree) combines both neighbors’ degree and their links’ weight. Using a co-authorship network, the association between these new measures and the existing measures with scholars’ performance is examined to show the applicability of the new centrality measures. The analysis shows that the scholars’ citation-based performances measures are significantly associated with all the proposed centrality measures but the correlation coefficient for the ones based on average indicators (i.e., a-Degree and Aw-Degree) is the highest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi, A., & Altmann, J. (2010). A asocial network system for analyzing publication activities of researchers. In T. J. Bastiaens, U. Baumol, & B. J. Kramer (Eds.), On collective intelligence (Vol. 76, pp. 49–61). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., & Hossain, L. (2013). Hybrid centrality measures for binary and weighted networks. In R. Menezes, A. Evsukoff, & M. C. González (Eds.), Complex networks (Studies in computational intelligence) (Vol. 424, pp. 1–7). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hwang, J. (2010). Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: Two indices, the rc-index and the cc-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities. Scientometrics, 83(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Chung, K. S. K., & Hossain, L. (2012a). Egocentric analysis of co-authorship network structure, position and performance. Information Processing and Management, 48(4), 671–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012b). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes, U., & Fleischer, D. (2005) Centrality measures based on current flow. In V. Diekert, & B. Durand (Eds.), STACS’05 Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on theoretical aspects of computer science (pp. 533–544). Berlin: Springer.

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B. (2006). H-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus, 1(1), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, A., Schubert, A., & Telcs, A. (2009). Lobby index in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(11), 2221–2226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W., Choi, J. N., & Kim, K. (2006). Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: the patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 266–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (2012). A hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability. Scientometrics, 91(1), 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, H., Truex III, D., & Cuellar, M. (2010). Evaluating scholarly influence through social network analysis: The next step in evaluating scholarly influence. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, 573.

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yana, X., Zhaia, L., & Fan, W. (2013). C-index: A weighted network node centrality measure for collaboration competence. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. X., Rousseau, R., & Ye, F. Y. (2011). H-degree as a basic measure in weighted networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuge, H., & Zhang, J. (2010). Topological centrality and its e-science applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1824–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author appreciates the anonymous reviewers for the constructive and invaluable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Abbasi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbasi, A. h-Type hybrid centrality measures for weighted networks. Scientometrics 96, 633–640 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0959-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0959-y

Keywords

Navigation