Abstract
The present paper attempts to shed light on outstanding research performance using the example of citation distributions. In order to answer the question of how the analysis of outstanding performance, in general, and highly cited papers, in particular, could be integrated into standard techniques of evaluative scientometrics. Two general methods are proposed: One solution aims at quantifying the performance represented by the tail of citation distributions independently of the “mainstream”, the second one, a parameter-free solution, provides performance classes for any level. Advantages and shortcoming of both methods are discussed.
References
Beirlant, J., Dierckx, G., Goegebeur, Y., & Matthys, G. (1999). Tail index estimation and an exponential regression model. Extremes, 2(2), 177–200.
Beirlant, J., Goegebeur, Y., Segers, J., & Teugels, J. L. (2004). Statistics of extremes: Theory and application. Chichester: Wiley.
Beirlant, J., Glänzel, W., Carbonez, A., & Leemans, H. (2007). Scoring research output using statistical quantile plotting. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 185–192.
Einmahl, J. H. J., Fils-Villetard, A., & Guillou, A. (2008). Statistics of extremes under random censoring. Bernoulli, 14(1), 207–227.
Fisher, R. A., & Tippett, L. H. C. (1928). Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 180–190.
Glänzel, W., Telcs, A., & Schubert, A. (1984). Characterization by truncated moments and its application to Pearson-type distributions. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 66, 173–183. (Correction: Probability Theory and Related Fields, 1987, 74, 317).
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988a). Theoretical and empirical studies of the tail of scientometric distributions. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 75–83). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988b). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123–127.
Glänzel, W. (2007). Characteristic scores and scales. A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 92–102.
Glänzel, W. (2009). The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics, 78(2), 355–374.
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2013). Thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0898-z.
Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of extremes. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hill, B. M. (1975). A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Annals of Statistics, 3, 1163–1174.
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Opthof, T. (2011). Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1370–1381.
Matthys, G., Delafosse, E., Guillou, A., & Beirlant, J. (2004). Estimating catastrophic quantile levels for heavy-tailed distributions. Insurance Mathematics & Economics, 34(3), 517–537.
Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, Th. N., van Raan, A. F. J., Visser, M. S., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras & V. Lariviere (Eds.), Proceedings of STI 2012 Montreal (17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators), Volume II (pp. 791–802).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glänzel, W. High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distributions. Scientometrics 97, 13–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1022-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1022-8