Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary analysis of international collaboration network of Chinese scholars in management research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking articles written by mainland China scholars from management related 258 journals indexed by Web of Science database as the data sets, this paper analyses the output of scientific research of Chinese scholars. It studies the structure, characteristics and development trend of collaboration network of Chinese scholars in management research area through scientometrics and social network analysis approaches. We found that the accumulated number of Chinese authors and the accumulated number of articles published by Chinese authors in the 258 journals increases by exponential form, most of which focus on Operations research & Management science. About half of the articles come up through international collaboration and the accumulated number of articles written through collaboration between Chinese and overseas scholars display an exponential increase. The evolution studies of the collaboration network indicate that the collaboration of Chinese scholars in the field of management is on a sharp rise. However, the collaboration network has not yet stepped into a mature and steady stage. Nonetheless, a tendency towards the stable stage is unveiled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., Uddin, S., & Rasmussen, K. J. R. (2011). Evolutionary dynamic of scientific collaboration networks: Multi-level and cross-time analysis. Scientometrics, 89(2), 687–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • China, N. N. S. F. (2012a). 2011 annual report of National Natural Science Foundation of China. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/2011ndbg/index.html. Accessed 1 March 2013.

  • China, N. N. S. F. (2012b). The historical annal report national natural science foundation of China (2003–2011). http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/ndbg/index.html. Accessed 1 March 2013.

  • Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2002). Evolution of networks. Advances in Physics, 51(4), 1079–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., & Niu, W. (2009). Analysis on the author cooperation network in the field of science of science: A case of science research management from 2004 to 2008. Science Research Management, 30(3), 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., Xiang, X., Zhu, Q., & Jiang, Q. (2011). Major problems and countermeasures effecting the scientific of college evaluation index. Higher agricultural education of China, (3), 15–18.

  • Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2007). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Zhu, D., Zhang, J., & Chen, K. D. (2009). Comparative analysis of domestic and international author networks. Chinese Journal of Management, 6(10), 1323–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronegger, L., Mali, F., Ferligoj, A., & Doreian, P. (2012). Collaboration structures in Slovenian scientific communities. Scientometrics, 90(2), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, M., & Gagné, J. (1994). International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science. Scientometrics, 31(3), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Goh, K. I., Kahng, B., & Kim, D. (2010). Complete trails of coauthorship network evolution. Physical Review E, 82(2), 026112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. I., Chang, B. C., & Chen, K. C. (2012). Collaboration patterns of Taiwanese scientific publications in various research areas. Scientometrics, 92(1), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. B., Ding, K., Yang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2010). Research on coauthoring of the paper of Chinese science and technology management field. Science and Technology Management Research, 30(3), 228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Person, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R., Person, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks.I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001c). The structure of scientic collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. (2002). A comparison of US and European university–industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steven, R. (2008). Management (vol. press). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 15–50).

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Chau, M. (2006). The social identity of IS: analyzing the collaboration network of the ICIS conferences (19802005). Paper presented at the Twenty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of PRC (No. 71171067, 70890082) and Postdoctoral Science-research Developmental Foundation of Heilongjiang province (No. LBH-Q11114).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangbin Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhai, L., Yan, X., Shibchurn, J. et al. Evolutionary analysis of international collaboration network of Chinese scholars in management research. Scientometrics 98, 1435–1454 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1040-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1040-6

Keywords

Navigation