Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Have Chinese universities, after enormous investment over the past decade, embraced the university’s third mission—contributing to industrial and technological progress? The literature has not sufficiently addressed this question. This study intends to advance understanding of this issue by empirically addressing this question from a business perspective in a bold and unconventional way. Unlike prior studies that simply used contingent and institutional factors to describe the link between Chinese universities and industrial firms by measuring such aspects as patent licensing, co-patenting, and co-authoring, our work goes further and applies longitudinal analysis to examine the ways firms access university-level knowledge and the impact of such knowledge on firm innovation outputs. We propose that if Chinese universities embraced their third mission, then we would observe a positive effect of university–industry collaborations on firms’ subsequent innovation outputs. Empirical results based on a sample of the top 100 Chinese electronic firms in terms of output value support our hypothesis. Specifically, university patent licensing and co-patenting between universities and firms was found to positively affect firm innovation outputs. Moreover, we found that geographical distance and collaboration dominance moderate the co-patenting–innovation output relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2008). The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric–bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2012). A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university–industry research collaborations. Scientometrics, 91(3), 955–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, A. (2000). Deregulation, technology imports and in-house R&D efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience. Research Policy, 29(9), 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenburg, T., Schmitz, H., & Stamm, A. (2008). Breakthrough? China’s and India’s transition from production to innovation. World Development, 36(2), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A. (1996). Contracting for tacit knowledge: The provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts. Journal of Development Economics, 50, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N. (2006). The act on inventions at public research institutions: Danish universities’ patenting activity. Scientometrics, 69(2), 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms: Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2(2), 157–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Jang, S.-L., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: The case of China. Scientometrics, 94(2), 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, A. V. (1980). The origin and direction of industrial R&D in India. Research Policy, 9(1), 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J., & Qiu, J. (2011). An approach to improve the indicator weights of scientific and technological competitiveness evaluation of Chinese universities. Scientometrics, 86(2), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duysters, G., Jacob, J., Lemmens, C., & Yu, J. (2009). Internationalization and technological catching up of emerging multinationals: A comparative case study of China’s Haier group. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2), 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eun, J.-H., Lee, K., & Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the “uniniversity-run enterprises” in China: A theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35(9), 1329–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasella, P. M. (1999). Universities: Engines of innovation in the information society. Scientometrics, 45(3), 543–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national innovation system. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technology and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C., & Soete, L. (2011). The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: Technological change and catching-up. World Development, 39(7), 1204–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2008). Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters, 99(3), 585–590.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., Yam, R. C. M., & Mok, C. (2005). Collaboration between industry and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing. China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 339–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1999). Market value and patent citations. NBER working paper, Paris.

  • Hausman, J. A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Economic and Political Weekly, 27, 909–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting 1965–1988. Review of Economic and Statistics, 80, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberg, E., Nabeshima, K., & Yusuf, S. (2007). Opening the ivory tower to business: University–industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Development, 35(6), 931–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. (2008). Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Research Policy, 37(4), 580–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. Kyklos, 64(4), 534–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. K. N. (2002). ‘Learning-by-licensing’: R&D and technology licensing in Brazilian invention. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 11(3), 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katrak, H. (1990). Imports of technology and the technological effort of Indian enterprises. World Development, 18(3), 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy: Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28(5), 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, X.-P., Zhao, Z.-Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.-Z., Huang, M.-H., & Zhao, Y.-H. (2012). The inventive activities and collaboration pattern of university–industry–government in China based on patent analysis. Scientometrics, 90(1), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Yi, Y., Guo, X., & Qi, W. (2012). Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: Based on a two-dimensional approach. Scientometrics, 90(2), 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Chen, L., Wu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2012). The role of Chinese universities in enterprise: University research collaboration. Scientometrics, 90(1), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. (2008). Academic capabilities in developing countries: A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research Policy, 37(2), 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefner, I., Hennemann, S., & Lu, X. (2006). Cooperation in the innovation process in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Beijing Zhongguancun. Environment and Planning, 38(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. (2005). China’s development model: An alternative strategy for technological catch-up. Working paper, Hitotsubashi.

  • Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. L., & Zhi, T. T. (2010). China is catching up in science and innovation: The experience of the Chinese academy of sciences. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, C., Zhou, C., & Liu, A. (2010). Patent strategy in Chinese universities: A comparative perspective. Scientometrics, 84(1), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London, New York: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2008). Coexistence of university–industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 76(3), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., Schwartz, M., Teece, D., Wagner, S., & Brach, P. (1982). Technology transfer, productivity, and economic policy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molas-Gallart, J., & Sinclair, T. (1999). From technology generation to technology transfer: The concept and reality of the “Dual-Use Technology Centres”. Technovation, 19(11), 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi, K. (2008). Assessment of technological capability in science industry linkage in China by patent database. World Patent Information, 30(3), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi, K., & Yun, X. (2007). China’s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages. Research Policy, 36(8), 1251–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabeshima, K., & Yusuf, S. (2007). Opening the ivory tower to business: University–industry linkages and the development of knowledge-intensive clusters in Asian cities. World Development, 35(6), 931–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2), 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6/7), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxeninan, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Kemmis, D., & Bell, M. (1985). Technological dynamism and technological content of collaboration: Are Indian firms missing opportunities? Economic and Political Weekly, 20(45/47), 1991–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2012). The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China. International Business Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.02.003.

  • Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chen, J. (2012). How Chinese firms employ open innovation to strengthen their innovative performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 59(3/4), 235–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2002). Developing innovative competences: The role of institutional frameworks. Industrial & Corporate Change, 11(3), 497–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2011). The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 173–202.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 812–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 project. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q., & Guan, J. (2012). Modeling the dynamic relation between science and technology in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 90(2), 561–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W. (2012). Determinants and effects of research partnerships in China’s emerging market. Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(1), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Funding of Sichuan University (No. skyb201302) and the Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 13YJC790154, and National Science Foundation of China (NSFC, grant no. 71003061; 71033001; 71273230) and National Social Science Foundation of China (NSSFC, grant no. 12&ZD098; 12&ZD199). The authors express greetings to the peer reviewers too.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School of Sichuan University, Sichuan University, No. 29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, Sichuan, China

    Yuandi Wang & Jiashun Huang

  2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research Institute, Sichuan University, No. 29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, Sichuan, China

    Yuandi Wang

  3. School of Economics and Management, and China Institute for Small & Medium Sized Enterprises, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China

    Yantai Chen

  4. School of Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Lingong Road 2, Dalian, 116024, China

    Xiongfeng Pan

  5. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Tsinghua East Road, Beijing, 10086, China

    Jin Chen

Authors
  1. Yuandi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiashun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yantai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiongfeng Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yantai Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Huang, J., Chen, Y. et al. Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective. Scientometrics 97, 207–222 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1055-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1055-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation