Skip to main content
Log in

International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the international collaboration of global library and information science (LIS), the present paper investigated the trends, networks as well as core groups of the international collaboration in LIS at the country and institution levels by combining bibliometric analysis and social network analysis. In this study, a total of 8,570 papers from 15 core journals during the period of 2000–2011 were collected. The results indicate that 66 % of papers are joint publications in global LIS. Two-country papers and two-institution papers are the two primary collaboration patterns in the international collaboration at the country and institution levels respectively. Through social network analysis, it is observed that the country collaboration network has reached a certain degree of maturity over the past 12 years in global LIS, while the international institution collaboration network has not yet matured and is made up of dozens of components. In the country collaboration network, the position of USA and UK are remarkable. Although the USA is positioned at the center of the network, institutions located in the USA are more inclined to have collaboration within domestic, suggesting institutions in the USA have a low tendency towards international collaboration. In the institution collaboration network, it is found that two groups located in the USA and Europe respectively. The results of the institution collaboration network also reveal that Katholieke Univ Leuven has not only the largest collaboration breadth, but also strong capabilities to control communication within the international institution collaboration network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in library and information science viewed through the web of knowledge: The Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Penumarthy, S., Meiss, M., & Ke, W. (2006). Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major US research institutions. Scientometrics, 68(3), 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. W. (2009). A bibliometric analysis of Asian authorship pattern in JASIST 1981–2005. In Asia Pacific conference on library and information education and practice. Tsukuba: Japan University of Tsukuba. Accessed October 20, 2012, from http://www.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/~atsushi/a-liep/proceedings/Papers/a31.pdf.

  • Chang, Y. W., & Huang, M. H. (2011). A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 22–33.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. W., & Huang, M. H. (2013). Prominent institutions in international collaboration network in astronomy and astrophysics. Scientometrics, 97(2), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chincilla-Rodriguez, Z., Ferligoj, A., Miguel, S., et al. (2012). Blockmodeling of co-authorship networks in library and information science in Argentina: A case study. Scientometrics, 93(3), 699–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. New York: Cambridge university Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M. (2011). Collaboration in computer science: A network science approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1992–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227, 669–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, B., Ding, Y., & Yan, E. J. (2012). Mining patterns of author orders in scientific publications. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 359–367.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Gao, Y., et al. (2011). A journal co-citation analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 86(3), 657–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jappe, A. (2007). Explaining international collaboration in global environmental change research. Scientometrics, 71(3), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegl, R., & Bates, D. (2011). International collaboration in psychology is on the rise. Scientometrics, 87(1), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C.R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred hears. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorship? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations methods and applications. Libri, 31(4), 294–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. H., Seo, I. W., Choe, H. C., et al. (2012). Collaboration network patterns and research performance: The case of Korean public research institutions. Scientometrics, 91(3), 925–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. I., Chang, B. C., & Chen, K. C. (2012). Collaboration patterns of Taiwanese scientific publications in various research areas. Scientometrics, 92(1), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, C. (2002). Measuring structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3. Accessed August 23, 2013, http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume3/McCarty.html.

  • Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64(2), 025102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nikzad, M., Jamali, H. R., & Hariri, N. (2011). Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study. Library and Information Science Research, 33(4), 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College and Research Libraries, 66(4), 341–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, J. (2007). The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: A bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy. Scientometrics, 70(3), 669–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sin, S. C. J. (2011). International coauthorship and citation impact: A bibliometric study of six LIS journals, 1980–2008. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1770–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). Regional development and interregional collaboration in the growth of nanotechnology research in China. Scientometrics, 86(1), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., et al. (2012). The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, D. (2012). An analysis of Canadian contributions to the information science research literature: 1989–2008. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 36(1–2), 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E. J., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. H. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2011). Institutional interactions: Exploring the social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1498–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q., Shao, H. F., He, P. F., et al. (2013). World scientific collaboration in coronary heart disease research. International Journal of Cardiology, 167(3), 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D. Z. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L. M., & Zhang, Q. P. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 51–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to anonymous referees and editors for their invaluable and insightful comments. This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71273126 and 71303120) and the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11CYY031). The authors would like to thank Prof. YunBin Zhu (School of Foreign Studies, Anhui University), Dr. Jian Wu (School of Foreign Languages, Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications) for their useful comments and language editing which have greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pu Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, P., Shi, J., Li, X. et al. International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level. Scientometrics 98, 53–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1146-x

Keywords

Navigation