Abstract
This study represents one of the first attempts to use empirical analysis to estimate academic productivity complex and proves the thesis that academic productivity is a function of multidimensional combination of the work of academic researchers: the scientific work, education, and external relationships. Given the complexity of academic productivity, it is necessary to clarify that it is divided into scientific productivity of the first type (scientific publications); scientific productivity of the second type (awards and academic positions); productivity in terms of external relationships (or external advice); and educational productivity. This objective of this paper is achieved through a sample survey (2,738 academics responded) conducted by Italian researchers from the PIR research project. The results obtained, however (as a case of estimates obtained using the results of a sample survey), are the result of a working reality that Italian academics are flooded by a myriad of activities that are not always consistent with the primary aims of the work of a researcher with an organisational and environmental well-being at the limit of iper productivity (or hyper productivity). The overall productivity (academic productivity) is significantly correlated with the four dimensions: average annual scientific productivity of the first type, average annual scientific productivity of the second type, the productivity external advice and, lastly, teaching productivity. The estimate of the sizes for the four indicators of productivity are the result of a literature search of the primary techniques used to assess productivity in academia. By comparing the most significant indicators, we managed to select all of the technical aspects missing in the Italian system of evaluation. This process allowed for us to add additional variables characterising the various aspects of productivity and prove the validity of our theory about the multidimensionality of academic productivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramo, G. (1998). Il sistema ricerca in Italia: il nodo del trasferimento tecnologico. Economia e Politica Industriale,, 99.
Abramo, G., & Lucantoni, S. (2003). Ricerca pubblica e trasferimento tecnologico: il caso del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. Economia e Politica Industriale, 119.
Abramo, G., & Pugini, F. (2004). Un’analisi della produttività scientifica e brevettuale delle università italiane. Working paper TTI.
Abramo, G., D’angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2008). Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? Research Policy, 38(1), 206–215.
Adams, J. D., & Griliches, Z. (1998). Research productivity in a system of universities. Annalse d’Economie et de Statistique, 49/50, 127–162.
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2003). Il trasferimento di conoscenze tecnologiche dall’università all’industria in Italia: nuova evidenza sui brevetti di paternità dei docenti, In: Bonaccorsi A. (ed.), Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia, Franco Angeli.
Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2003). Intervento istituzionale e commercializzazione della conoscenza accademica: uno studio del sistema brevettuale delle università italiane. XIV Riunione Scientifica della Associazione Italiana di Ingegneria Gestionale su Imprenditorialità e Competenze Manageriali, Bergamo.
Bonaccorsi, A., Darario, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric method to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 389–410.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599–616.
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity. A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5(2), 91–109.
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large—scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107–117.
Calderini, M., & Franzoni, C. (2004). Is academic patenting detrimental to high quality research? An empirical analysis of the relationship between scientific careers and patent applications. Working Paper no. 162. CESPRI, University Bocconi.
Campo dall’Orto, S., & Conti, G. (2002). Il ruolo di un servizio brevetti nell’ambito del trasferimento tecnologico tra l’università e il tessuto industriale locale: l’esperienza del Politecnico di Milano, XIII Riunione Scientifica della Associazione Italiana di Ingegneria Gestionale su Impresa e Competizione Knowledge-Based, Lecce.
Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2003). L’attività brevettuale degli enti pubblici di ricerca in Italia ed in Europa. Rilevante? In crescita? Utile? In: Bonaccorsi, A. (Eds.), Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia, Franco Angeli.
Corley, E. A. (2005). How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research, 22, 637–655.
Corley, E. A., & Sabharwal, M. (2007). Foreign-born academic and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S. born peers? Research in Higher Education, 48, 909–940.
Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication pro- ductivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 542–571.
Gilli, G. (2010). Produttività scientifica globale e di Eccellenza delle Università Statali Italiane nel periodo 1975–2010 in Working paper Dipartimento di Chimica dell’Universita` di Ferrara. Ferrara.
Graves, P. E., Marchand, J. R., & Thompson, R. (1982). Economics departments rankings: Research incentives, constraints and efficiency. American Economic Review, 72(5), 1131–1141.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34, 932–950.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (2003). Scientists and satisfaction. Social Studies of Science, 33, 45–73.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81–93.
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2003). Incentives and inventions in universities. In CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3916. London, UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Markusova, V. A., Tsygankova, A. I., & Krylova, T. A. (2009). The indices of scientific productivity and ratings of domestic universities. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36, 229–233.
Monteleone, S., & Torrisi, B. (2012a). Italian researchers abroad: A multivariate analysis of migration trends in Rivista Italiana degli Economisti XVII.
Monteleone, S., & Torrisi, B. (2012b). Geographical analysis of the academic brain drain in Italy in Scietometrics Journal ed. Springer.
Piccaluga, A., & Patrono, A. (2001). Attività brevettuale degli enti pubblici di ricerca italiani. Un’analisi sul periodo 1982–2001, in Economia e Politica Industriale, n 109.
Rousseau, R., & STIMULATE 8 GROUP (2009). On the relation between the WoS impact factor, the Eigenfactor, in the SCImago Journal Rank, the Article Influence Score and the journal h—index. http://eprints.rclis.org/13304/.
Salaran, M. (2010). Research productivity and social capital in Australian higher education. Higher Education Quarterly Volume, 64, 133–148.
Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & Dicrisi, F. A. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423–446.
Skonieczny, G., & Torrisi, B. (2009). A statistical approach to study the determinants geographic mobility of brain drain. In Proceedings of Second Arab Statistical Conference, Surt. Surt.
Skonieczny, G., & Torrisi. B. (2011). Fuga del capitale umano italiano di alta qualificazione: esclusione sociale o povertà indotta? In Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica. 3/4.
Stack, S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 891–920.
Torrisi, B. (2012a). La produttività accademica correlata al benessere lavorativo dei ricercatori italiani in Italia e all’estero. In Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica.
Torrisi, B. (2012b). Academic productivity correlated with well-being at work in Scietometrics Journal ed. Springer.
Tower, G. (2006). A multidisciplinary study of gender-based research productivity in the world’s best journals. Journal of Diversity Management, 2(4), 23–32.
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19–50.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Challenges in ranking of universities. In First international conference on World Class Universities, Shanghai: Shanghai Jaio Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Inglish language text audited and corrected by Elsevier Language Service.
The data base and the empirical research project, including data collecting and data processing, are the work of Benedetto Torrisi (StatEcon- Area of Economic Statistics, University of Catania), author and principal investigator of the project PIR “Productivity Italian Researchers” and “Italian Academic Potential Brain Drain”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torrisi, B. A multidimensional approach to academic productivity. Scientometrics 99, 755–783 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1149-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1149-7
Keywords
- Academic productivity complex
- Scientific productivity
- Assignments and awards
- Patents and service productivity
- Didactics productivity