Abstract
This study aims what knowledge capital accumulated by the public research institutes (PRIs) of South Korea and Taiwan to facilitate process configurations of new industrial structure. The patenting trends of two PRIs, ETRI of South Korea and ITRI of Taiwan, are assessed to highlight the established knowledge structures for emergence of multi-agent structure since 1990s. To examine their dynamics and variations of knowledge capital, the data series are separated into two phases (catching-up phase from 1970s to 1990s, and post catching-up phase since the 2000s) in accordance to (1) number of patents, (2) number of sole owned and co-owned patents, (3) backward and forward citations, (4) science-linked patents, and (5) fields of patent. When the role of PRIs in the latecomer country is evolving from a facilitator in the catching-up phase to become a mediator in the post catching-up phase, this study demonstrated their influence and dynamic effect in reinforcing industrial strategies and national approaches to attain endogenous structural change in the national innovation system. Our results signal telecommunications is the promising technology targeted by Korea’s chaebols while Taiwan’s small-medium size enterprises are utilizing the aggregate knowledge capital accumulated and derived from semiconductor technologies to develop their niches onto a diverse range of product innovations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The learning system of indigenous firms was based on deliberate knowledge transfer from lead firms.
Creative imitation routine appear to be the reproductive success of South Korea and Taiwan.
Multi-agent denotes to actors in multi-structural technological activities.
Industrial stakeholders are who by their activities triggered new industrial structures.
The flying geese model was proposed by Akamatsu in 1962 to explain the dynamic migration industries of developing countries in East Asia with leading country like Japan and second tier countries like South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kung showed comparative industrial advantages in countries.
References
Akamatsu, K. (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. Journal of Developing Economies, 1(1), 3–25.
Amsden, A., & Chu, W.-W. (2003). Beyond late development: Taiwan’s upgrading policies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Avimelech, G., & Teubal, M. (2008). Evolutionary targeting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 151–166.
Beers, C. V., Berghall, E., & Poot, Tom. (2008). R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: evidence from Finland and the Netherlands. Research Policy, 37, 294–308.
Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Tsai, C.-T. (1999). A stage approach for industrial technology development and implementation—The case of Taiwan computer industry. Technovation, 19(4), 233–241.
Choung, J.-Y., Hameed, T., & Ji, I. (2011). Role of formal standards in transition to the technology frontier: Korean ICT systems. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 269–287.
Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2013). The evolutionary patterns of knowledge production in Korea. Scientometrics, 94(2), 629–650.
Chu, P.-Y., Lin, Y.-L., Hsiung, H.-H., & Liu, T.-Y. (2006). Intellectual capital: An empirical study of ITRI. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 886–902.
ETRI Technology Report. (2012). Get creative, get productive. Daejeon: ETRI Publishing.
Foray, D. (2006). The economics of knowledge. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Fritsch, M., & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university cooperation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 69–83.
Fuller, D. B. (2005). The changing limits and the limits of change: The state, private firms, international industry and china in the evolution of Taiwan’s electronic industry. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(44), 483–506.
Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of economics of innovation: Theory, measurement and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Hu, M.-C. (2008). Knowledge flows and innovation capability: The patenting trajectory of Taiwan’s thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 1423–1438.
Hu, M.-C. (2012). Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film Transistor liquid display industries of Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(3), 541–555.
Hu, M.-C., & Mathews, J. (2008). China’s national innovation capacity. Research Policy, 37, 1465–1479.
Hu, M.-C., & Philips, F. (2011). Technological evolution and interdependence in China’s emerging biofuel industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1130–1146.
Whang, Y.-K., & Hobday, M. (2011). Local ‘test bed’ market demand in the transition to leadership: The case of the Korean mobile handset industry. World Development, 39(8), 1358–1371.
Jang, S.-L., & Huang, G.-G. (2005). Public R&D and industrial innovations at the project levels: An exploration of Taiwan’s public research projects. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(4), 636–646.
Joly, P. B., & Mangematin, V. (1996). Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organization of R&D: The dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organization. Research Policy, 25, 901–922.
Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kojima, Kiyoshi. (2000). The “flying geese” model of Asian economic development: origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 11, 375–401.
Lee, K., & Kim, Y. K. (2010). IPR and technological catch-up in Korea. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, & N. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual property rights, development and catch-up: An international comparative study (pp. 133–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459–483.
Mathews, J. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 467–488.
Mathews, J., & Cho, D.-S. (2000). Tiger technology: The creation of a semiconductor industry in east Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. R. (2007). Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy, 36(10), 1512–1528.
Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31, 265–272.
Odagoro, H., Goto, A., Sunami, A., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up: An international comparative study. New York: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Ratanawaraha, A. (2006). Late standardization and technological catch-up. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wong, C.-Y. (2013). On a path to creative destruction: science, technology and science-based technological trajectories of Japan and South Korea. Scientometrics, 96(1), 323–336.
Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2012). The pathways for development: Science and technology of NIEs and selected emerging countries. Scientometrics, 92(3), 523–548.
Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, John. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea and China. Research Policy, 41, 524–540.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shiu, JW., Wong, CY. & Hu, MC. The dynamic effect of knowledge capitals in the public research institute: insights from patenting analysis of ITRI (Taiwan) and ETRI (Korea). Scientometrics 98, 2051–2068 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1158-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1158-6