Skip to main content
Log in

How the same organizational structures can arise across seemingly unrelated domains of human activities: the example of academic publishing and stock market

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we show how the same organizational structures can arise across seemingly unrelated domains of human activities. To this end we examine the example of academic journals publishing and stock market. A number of academic journals with low-prestige and limited resources may compete in the same selection process of high-quality manuscripts. This shared selection process is performed by an independent editorial committee. A journal editor is interested in maximizing the growth rate of journal wealth based on an optimal strategy of allocations on candidate manuscripts. Here we introduce the system of optimality equations for the maximization problem. Next, we find an optimal set of manuscripts to allocate on, as well as the optimal allocation fractions. It can be easily implemented by a simple algorithm for use at the shared selection process of high-quality manuscripts. The proposed structure presents a loose network of economic transactions, i.e. journal editors compete on somewhat like manuscript market by making stakes and risking their money. We provide a publicly available suite of web-based tools designed to the computation of the optimal set of manuscripts and the respective allocation fractions. Examples of the performance of the Web application for allocating journal resources are presented for two different selection processes of high-quality manuscripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 244.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Shulenburger, D. (2003). The high cost of scholarly journals (and what to do about it). Change, 35(6), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2011). Overall prestige of journals with ranking score above a given threshold. Scientometrics, 89(1), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. A., Rodriguez-Sanchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2013). The selection of high-quality manuscripts. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1034-4.

  • Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzidakis, P., Stengos, T., & Mamuneas, T. P. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6), 1346–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Technical Journal, 35, 917–926.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loève M. (1960). Probability theory. New York: Van Nostrand.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smoczynski, P., & Tomkins, D. (2010). An explicit solution to the problem of optimizing the allocations of a bettors wealth when wagering on horse races. Mathematical Scientist, 35(1), 10–17.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham, M. (2009). The future of scholarly journals publishing among social science and humanities associations. New Jersey: Mary Waltham Publishing Consultant, from http://www.MaryWaltham.com. Accessed April 2013.

  • Wellcome Trust. (2003). Economic analysis of scientific research publishing: A report commissioned by the wellcome trust. Histon, Cambridgeshire: SQW Limited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Spanish Board for Science and Technology (MICINN) under Grant TIN2010-15157 cofinanced with European FEDER funds. Sincere thanks are due to the reviewers for their insightful comments, constructive suggestions, and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García, J.A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R. & Fdez-Valdivia, J. How the same organizational structures can arise across seemingly unrelated domains of human activities: the example of academic publishing and stock market. Scientometrics 99, 447–461 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1184-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1184-4

Keywords

Navigation