Skip to main content
Log in

Basic research is overshadowed by applied research in China: a policy perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that basic research has been overshadowed by applied research in China for decades, from the perspective of S&T policy. The data involves 4,707 Chinese S&T policies during the period between 1949 and 2010, which are grouped into five phases, based on the process of S&T system reform in China. We also found that S&T policies in China are leaning more towards basic research, and the gap between basic research and applied research is shrinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao, C. (2002). Strengthening China through science and education: China’s development strategy toward the twenty-first century. Issues & Studies, 38(3), 122–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2009). Structural equation model with PLS path modeling for an integrated system of publicly funded basic research. Scientometrics, 81(3), 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China suggests that China (ISTIC). (2013). Statistical Data of Chinese S&T Papers 2013. Retrieved on October 28, 2013 from http://www.istic.ac.cn/ScienceEvaluateArticalShow.aspx?ArticleID=95278.

  • Meng, W., Hu, Z., & Liu, W. (2006). Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China. Scientometrics, 69(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, R., & Qu, W. (2008). The development of science and technology in China: A comparison with India and the United States. Technology in Society, 30, 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. (2012). China’s budget backs science. Nature, 483(7389), 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J., & Huang, C. (2010). Catalogue guide to the science and technology policy of China (1949–2010) (p. 2012). Shanghai: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, L. (1997). A historical perspective of China’s innovation system reform: a case Study. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 14, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, X., & Yang, X. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China’s national innovation system. Technology in Society, 29(3), 317–325.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 71233005, 71173184, and 71203193) for financial support. We also thank Dr. Dazhi Cheng, Mr. Zhang Li, Ms. Ting Xia and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X. et al. Basic research is overshadowed by applied research in China: a policy perspective. Scientometrics 99, 689–694 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1199-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1199-x

Keywords

Navigation