Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inevitably, the career success of academicians is partially dependent on the journals in which their manuscripts are published. Accordingly, knowledge of which journals are considered prestigious or of dubious quality is critical to an academician. Fortunately, several rankings of accounting journals have been published, providing insights to manuscript authors, and this study includes a discussion of several prior studies that have, by various methods, attempted to accurately compare the quality of accounting journals. Critically, however, this study also describes a survey of accredited business schools that submitted their departmental journal lists which were employed by those institutions in the assessment of faculty publications. Those departmental journal lists with multiple quality tiers were used to construct a journal ranking based on the evaluative, departmental reality faced by academicians rather than citation counts or expressed perceptions of journals. While the journal ranking of this study reveals consistency with many previous studies regarding the top five accounting journals, the study also indicates that departmental journal lists, which are reflective of the priorities of the schools that created them, often ascribe value to the diversity of journals that focus on specializations but not journals that are predominantly oriented toward accounting practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (2012). How can accounting researchers become more innovative? Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 851–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V., & Goodacre, A. (2006). A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance. Accounting and Business Research, 36(2), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beets, S. D., Lewis, B. R., & Brower, H. H. (2013). The quality of business ethics journals: An assessment based on application. Business & Society.

  • Bonner, S. E., Hesford, J. W., Van der Stede, W. A., & Young, S. M. (2006). The most influential journals in academic accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinn, T., Jones, M. J., & Pendlebury, M. (1996). UK accountants’ perceptions of research journal quality. Accounting and Business Research, 26(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D. (2003). Ranking journals using social science research network downloads. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., & Huefner, R. J. (1994). The familiarity with and perceived value of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. MBA programs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., Chan, K. C., Seow, G. S., & Tam, K. (2009). Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 875–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., & Liano, K. (2009). Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions, and researchers in accounting. Accounting & Finance, 49, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. S. (2012). Framing the issue of research quality in a context of research diversity. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. R., & Huang, Y. (2007). Author affiliation index, finance journal ranking, and the pattern of authorship. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 1008–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Raviv, T., & Richardson, A. J. (2010). Aggregating incomplete lists of journal rankings: An application to academic accounting journals. Accounting Perspectives, 9(3), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, C. P., Everett, J. O., Vijayakumar, J., & Olds, P. R. (2012). Evaluating faculty publications in accounting Ph.D. programs: The author affiliation index as an alternative. Journal of Accounting Education, 30, 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. W., & Ross, W. R. (1991). Measuring accounting faculty perceptions of accounting journals: An empirical test and updated journal rankings. Advances in Accounting, 9, 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (2008). Ranking the management journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 39(4), 373–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic journal quality guide, version 4. The Association of Business Schools.

  • Hasselback, J. R., & Reinstein, A. (1995). A proposal for measuring scholarly productivity of accounting faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, 10(2), 269–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselback, J. R., Reinstein, A., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2011). A longitudinal study of the research productivity of graduates of accounting doctoral programs. Advances in Accounting, 27(1), 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselback, J. R., Reinstein, A., & Schwan, E. S. (2000). Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty. Journal of Accounting Education, 18, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, T. L., & Hall, T. W. (2005). Faculty perceptions of journals: Quality and publishing feasibility. Journal of Accounting Education, 22, 175–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2010). Behavior-based analysis of knowledge dissemination channels in operations management. Omega, 38(3–4), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. P., & Wright, G. B. (1990). Faculty perceptions of journal quality: An update. Accounting Horizons, 4, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. M., Reckers, P. M. J., & Solomon, L. (2002). Evolving research benchmarks. Advances in Accounting, 19, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, S. A., Schroeder, R. G., & Spear, R. K. (1995). An empirical investigation of the relationship between journal quality ratings and promotion and tenure decisions. Accounting Educators’ Journal, 7(2), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J., & Lowe, A. (2002). Problematising the construction of journal quality: An engagement with the mainstream. Accounting Forum, 26(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A., & Locke, J. (2005). Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web-based survey of british accounting academics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowensohn, S., & Samelson, D. P. (2006). An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(3), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D., Gaskin, J., Galletta, D. F., Humpherys, S. L., Barlow, J. B., et al. (2013). Evaluating journal quality and the association for information systems senior scholars’ journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value? MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 993–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matherly, M., & Shortridge, R. T. (2009). A pragmatic model to estimate journal quality in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 27, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Harzing, A. (2007). Ranking journals in business and management: A statistical analysis of the Harzing data set. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, D. V. (2012). Is accounting research stagnant? Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 845–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisonger, T. E. (2004). The benefits and drawbacks of impact factor for journal collection management in libraries. Serials Librarian, 47(1–2), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oler, D. K., Oler, M. J., & Skousen, C. J. (2010). Characterizing accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 24(4), 635–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oltheten, E., Theoharakis, V., & Travlos, N. G. (2005). Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(1), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peffers, K., & Ya, T. (2003). Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: Ranking the journals. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickerd, J., Stephens, N. M., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2011). Individual accounting faculty research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(3), 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., & Whitelaw, P. (2006). A multi-dimensional examination of marketing journal rankings by North American academics. Marketing Education Review, 16(3), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinstein, A., & Calderon, T. G. (2006). Examining accounting departments’ rankings of the quality of accounting journals. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 17, 457–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, D., & Wooliscroft, B. (2009). Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google scholar and the g-index. The British Accounting Review, 41, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M. (1994). Relative contributions of professional journals to the field of accounting. Accounting Educators’ Journal, 6(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahai, A., & Rigsby, J. T. (1998). Information processing using citations to investigate journal influence in accounting. Information Processing and Management, 34(2/3), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, B., & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Fleet, D. D., McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2000). A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists. Journal of Management, 26(5), 839–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artifact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics, 92, 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, R. (2008). Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis. The British Accounting Review, 40, 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. B., Fleischman, G. M., & Stephenson, T. (2010). The incidence of documented standards for research in departments of accounting at US institutions. Journal of Accounting Education, 28(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    S. Douglas Beets, Andrea S. Kelton & Bruce R. Lewis

Authors
  1. S. Douglas Beets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea S. Kelton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce R. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Douglas Beets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beets, S.D., Kelton, A.S. & Lewis, B.R. An assessment of accounting journal quality based on departmental lists. Scientometrics 102, 315–332 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1353-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1353-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation