Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual evolution of qualitative research in the field of marketing from 1956 to 2011, identifying the main themes and applications for which it has been used and the trends for the future. Science mapping analysis was employed, using co-word networks in a longitudinal framework. Science mapping analysis differs from other tools in that it includes the use of bibliometric indicators. The great number of studies published makes it possible to undertake a conceptual analysis of how qualitative marketing research has evolved. To show the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research, four study periods were chosen. The results made it possible to identify eight thematic areas that employ qualitative research in the field of marketing: Consumer behaviour, Supply chain management, Dynamic capabilities, Methodology, Media, Business to business marketing, International Marketing and Customer Satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, I. (2005). Fieldwork and data collection in qualitative marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(1), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46(5), 1417–1429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. G. (2006). An extension of the hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Citations to the “introduction to informetrics” indexed by wos, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 82(3), 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of qualitative research methods in marketing. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the maps of science. Scientometrics, 49(3), 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research—the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. L., & Gregor, F. (Eds.). (2004). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. California: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartes-Velásquez, R., & Manterola-Delgado, C. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of articles published in ISI dental journals, 2007–2011. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2223–2233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & González-Padrón, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrzanowska, J. (Ed.). (2002). Interviewing groups and individuals in qualitative market research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011b). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012a). A note on the ITS topic evolution in the period 2000–2009 at T-ITS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012b). Scimat: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo, M. J., Chiclana, F., Collop, A., de Oña, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of the intelligent transportation systems research based on science mapping. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(2), 901–908.

  • Cook, D. J., & Holder, L. B. (2006). Mining graph data. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (Ed.). (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, P. (Ed.). (2002). Methods beyond interviewing in qualitative market research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (Ed.). (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereaut, G., Imms, M., & Callingham, M. (Eds.). (2002). Analysis and interpretation in qualitative market research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fern, E. F. (Ed.). (2001). Advanced focus group research. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetscherin, M., & Usunier, J. C. (2012). Corporate branding: An interdisciplinary literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 46(5), 733–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., & Maisano, D. (2012). Quality & quantity journal: A bibliometric snapshot. Quality & Quantity, 46(2), 573–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2000). The brainstorming myth. Business Strategy Review, 11(4), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvagno, M. (2011). The intellectual structure of the anti-consumption and consumer resistance field: An author co-citation analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1688–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao-Yong, L., Ji-Ming, H., & Hui-Ling, W. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1994). Scientography: Mapping the tracks of science. Current Contents: Social & Behavioural Sciences, 7(45), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (Eds.). (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A., & Grinstein, A. (2010). Stages in the development of market orientation publication activity: A longitudinal assessment. European Journal of Marketing, 44(9/10), 1384–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2002). Relationship marketing and a new economy: It’s time for de-programming. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(7), 585–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2005). Qualitative research in marketing. Road-map for a wilderness of complexity and unpredictability. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3), 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (Eds.). (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, D., & Grimmer, M. (2007). The mix of qualitative and quantitative research in major marketing journals, 1993–2002. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individuals scientific research out-put. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16,569–16,572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. H., & Chang, C. P. (2014). Detecting research fronts in oled field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1721–1744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imms, M., & Ereaut, G. (Eds.). (2002). An introduction to qualitative market research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (Eds.). (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, W. H., & Hogreve, J. (2011). Toward a deeper understanding of service marketing: The past, the present, and the future. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, B. E. (1994). Nominal grouping sessions. Marketing Research, 6(3), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawal, M. (2009). Reconciling methodological approaches of survey and focus group. Nurse Researcher, 17(1), 54–61.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, C. N., & Leonidou, L. C. (2011). Research into environmental marketing/management: A bibliographic analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 68–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Cobo, M. J., Martínez, M. A., Kou, G., & Shi, Y. (2012). A conceptual snapshot of the first decade (2002–2011) of the international journal of information technology & decision making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(2), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesios, C. C., & Psarakis, S. (2014). Comparison of the h-index for different fields of research using bootstrap methodology. Quality & Quantity, 48(1), 521–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, M., Herrera, M., Lpez-Gijn, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). H-classics: Characterizing the concept of citation classics through h-index. Scientometrics, 98(1), 1971–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Sánchez, M. A., Cobo, M. J., Herrera, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice (in press).

  • Mertens, D. M. (Ed.). (2005). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H., De Bruin, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., & Van Der Veer, Martens B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (Eds.). (2002). Readme First for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustakis, C. (Ed.). (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-Del-Jesus, M. I., Sánchez-Ferández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999a). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1999b). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okazaki, S., & Mueller, B. (2007). Cross-cultural advertising research: Where we have been and where we need to go. International Marketing Review, 24(5), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozel, B. (2012). Individual cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia. Scientometrics, 91(2), 539–555.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, A. (2005). Processes, relationships, settings, products and consumers: The case for qualitative diary research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 142–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (Ed.). (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1993). Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling. Research Policy, 22(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, S. F. (2000). Ethnography and grounded theory: A happy marriage? Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy, 17(5), 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 324–339). California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (Ed.). (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, J. E., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & quantity, 36(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiee, S., & Chabowski, B. R. (2012). Knowledge structure in international marketing: A multi-method bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (Ed.). (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (Ed.). (1995). The art of case study research. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1997). Lifestyle as a generic concept in ethnographic research. Quality & Quantity, 31(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternitzke, C., & Bergmann, I. (2009). Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist. Scientometrics, 78(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. C., & Corbin, J. M. (Eds.). (1990). Basic of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslay, C., Morgan, R. E., & Sheth, J. N. (2009). Peter drucker on marketing: An exploration of five tenets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (Ed.). (1990). Researching the lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. University of Western Ontario, London.

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19–50). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (Ed.). (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zong, Q. J., Shen, H. Z., Yuan, Q. J., Hu, X. W., Hou, Z. P., & Deng, S. G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Excellence Andalusian Projects TIC-5299 and TIC-5991, and National Project TIN2010-17876. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. They also wish to thank Mary Georgina Hardinge for translation and English language editing assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Marketing, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain

    E. M. Murgado-Armenteros, M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo & F. J. Torres-Ruiz

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

    M. J. Cobo

Authors
  1. E. M. Murgado-Armenteros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. J. Torres-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Cobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Cobo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murgado-Armenteros, E.M., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Torres-Ruiz, F.J. et al. Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis. Scientometrics 102, 519–557 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1443-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1443-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation