Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examined the coauthorship patterns of China’s humanities and social sciences (HSS), based on articles and reviews covered by the Social Science Citation Index and the Arts and Humanities Citation Index of the Web of Science. We defined four types of coauthorship as: no collaboration (NOC), national collaboration (NAC), bilateral international collaboration (BIC) and multilateral international collaboration (MIC), and proposed the development phases of China’s HSS as: 1978–1991, 1992–2000 and 2001–present. Accordingly, we explored the evolution of coauthorship patterns by a number of metrics. Findings include: (1) the coauthorship patterns of China’s HSS significantly evolved from NOC to NAC, BIC and MIC; (2) China’s major collaborators had not significantly varied over the past decade, in which USA had always taken the lead (among every four HSS articles of China, one was collaborated with USA); (3) pic (percentage of internationally coauthored articles) was negatively correlated to pnc (percentage of not cited articles); (4) MIC is 1.5 times the CPP (citation per publication) of BIC, 3 times of NAC and 4 times of NOC. Chinese government has been eagerly promoting economic development through science and technology. However, after over 30 years’ growth miracle, Chinese government realized that China’s HSS had been overshadowed, and then initiated prosperity plannings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14(5–6), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N. K. (2013). An empirical investigation of the influence of collaboration in Finance on article impact. Scientometrics, 95(3), 911–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2001). International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52(3), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Vinu Kumar, B. S. (2000). International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 48(3), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. S., Xu, X., & Gao, Y. (2014). The China growth miracle: The role of the formal and the informal institutions. World Economy,. doi:10.1111/twec.12193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. Y., Hen, K. W., Tan, H. P., & Fox, K. F. (2013). Patterns of coauthorship and research collaboration in Malaysia. Aslib Proceedings, 65(6), 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, C., & Glänzel, W. (1997). Modelling and measuring multilateral coauthorship in international scientific collaboration. Part I. Development of a new model using a series expansion approach. Scientometrics, 49(3), 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. L., & Huang, L. (2009). Philosophy and social sciences in China: Towards the world. International Communications, 0(1), 59–61. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Division of Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education. (2005). Report on the development of philosophy and social sciences in Chinese colleges and universities. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean. Interciencia, 2(3), 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Characteristics of research in China assessed with Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics, 88(3), 841–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). The long-term influence of collaboration on citation patterns. Research Evaluation, 23(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & de Lange, C. (1997). Modelling and measuring multilateral coauthorship in international scientific collaboration. Part II. A Comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links. Scientometrics, 49(3), 605–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad’ or ‘Tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in the changing Europe (1983–2003). An exploratory study on sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 70(2), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through coauthorship. In H. F. M. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Winterhager, M. (1992). International collaboration of three east European countries with Germany in the sciences, 1980–1989. Scientometrics, 25(2), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorraiz, J., Reimann, R., & Gumpenberger, C. (2012). Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: A case study for Austria and six countries. Scientometrics, 91(2), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M. R. (1978, April 1). The Spring of Science. People’s Daily, p. D3.

  • He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., & Li, J. (2014). Basic research is overshadowed by applied research in China: a policy Perspective. Scientometrics, 99(3), 689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, H. (1999). A new model of scientific collaboration. Part 1. Theoretical approach. Scientometrics, 46(3), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundra, R., & Kretschmer, H. (1999). A new model of scientific collaboration. Part 2. Collaboration patterns of Indian medicine. Scientometrics, 46(3), 519–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Sanderson, M., Willett, P., Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 554–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Willett, P. (2010). Bibliometric analysis of Chinese research on cyclization, MALDI-TOF, and antibiotics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50(1), 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. (2014). Library of congress classification outline. 23 July, 2014. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/

  • Lv, H. Y., & Feng, Y. Q. (2009). A measure of authors’ centrality in coauthorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships. Scientometrics, 81(2), 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, R. (2012). Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic database. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 532–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Vindefjärd, A. N., & Sundberg, C. J. (2010). What do European research collaboration networks in life sciences look like? Research Evaluation, 19(5), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megnigbeto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: The case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96(3), 1113–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meho, L., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S. (1999). Transnational linkages of Indian Science: A structural analysis. Scientometrics, 46(1), 109–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001b). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2), 404–409.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS, 101(1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu, F., & Qiu, J. (2014). Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1221–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Main Science and Technology Indicators. OECD Science, Technology and R&D Statistics (database). doi:10.1787/data-00182-en

  • Okubo, Y., Dore, J. C., Ojasoo, T., & Miquel, J. F. (1998). A multivariate analysis of publication trends in the 1980s with special reference to south-east Asia. Scientometrics, 41(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnikova, T., & Rake, B. (2014). Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: Exploration of country-level determinants. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1173–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19(1–2), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivats, S. V., & Bhattacharya, S. (2014). Forecasting the trend of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1364-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2013). Scientific research in the natural sciences in South Africa: A scientometric study. South African Journal of Science, 109(7–8), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, X., Deng, S., & Shen, S. (2014). The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1567–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, X., Han, X. M., & Han, X. N. (2001). Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Online Information Review, 25(6), 365–369.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China-US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2011). The growth of international collaboration in East European scholarly communities: A bibliometric analysis of journal articles published between 1989 and 2009. Scientometrics, 89(2), 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, A. (1996). A bibliometric analysis of physics publications from Middle Eastern countries. Scientometrics, 36(2), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The Influence of International Collaboration on the Impact of Research Results, Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Guns, R. (2014). Predicting and recommending collaborations: An author-, institution-, and country-level analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Qiu, J., & Xiong, Z. (2010). An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics, 84(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., Liu, L., Feng, Y., Shao, Z., & Li, Y. (2014). Cext-N index: A network node centrality measure for collaborative relationship distribution. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1358-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Su, X., & Deng, S. (2008). The academic impact of Chinese humanities and social science research. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Zhong, Y. F., & Yu, M. G. (2013). A bibliometric investigation on China-UK collaboration in food and agriculture. Scientometrics, 97(2), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71203193). We also thank Ms. Alice M. Tan and Dr. Star X. Zhao for data collection, and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Resource Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Jiang Li & Yueting Li

Authors
  1. Jiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yueting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Li, Y. Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics 102, 1997–2010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1471-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1471-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation