Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A quantitative examination of the intellectual profile and evolution of information security from 1965 to 2015

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information security has become a central societal concern over the past two decades. Few studies have examined the information security research domain, and no literature has been found that has applied an objective, quantitative methodology. The central aim of the current research was to quantitatively describe the profile and evolution of the information security specialty. Bibliometric data extracted from 74,021 Scopus research records published from 1965 to 2015 were examined using impact and productivity measures as well as co-word and domain visualization techniques. This scientometric study presents a comprehensive view of the information security specialty from several perspectives (e.g., temporal, seminal papers, institutions, sources, authors). After a long and steady period of growth (1965–2004), an exponential publication output occurred between 2005 and 2010. Among all the countries involved in information security research, the United States and China had the greatest impact, and China has surpassed the United States in terms of productivity. Information security as a specialty is largely populated by publications from the technical fields of computer science and engineering. Several research themes were found throughout the decades (e.g., cryptography and information security management and administration), and emergent research subspecialties appeared in later decades (e.g., intrusion detection, medical data security, steganography, wireless security). This study reduces the complexity of the specialty to controllable terms, supplies objective data for science policy making, identifies the salient bibliographic units, and uncovers growth patterns. It also serves as an information retrieval tool to identify important papers, authors, and institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Avižienis, A., Laprie, J. C., Randell, B., & Landwehr, C. (2004). Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 1(1), 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajwa, R. S., Yaldram, K., & Rafique, S. (2013). A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective. Scientometrics, 94(1), 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. L., & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-free networks. Scientific America, 288, 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, C. (2013). Scientometric analysis of cryptography research output. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 50(4), 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batistič, S., & Kaše, R. (2015). The organizational socialization field fragmentation: A bibliometric review. Scientometrics, 104(1), 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blažun, H., Kokol, P., & Vošner, J. (2015). Research literature production on nursing competences from 1981 till 2012: A bibliometric snapshot. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, A., & Kovacich, G. L. (2006). Information assurance: Securing the information environment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. A., & Gaaingwe, T. G. (2006). Reflecting on 20 SEC conferences. Computers and Security, 25(4), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P. (1997). Speaker recognition: A tutorial. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(9), 1437–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaccio, T. (2013, June 10). Pentagon five-year cybersecurity plan seeks 23 billion. Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-10/pentagon-five-year-cybersecurity-plan-seeks-23-billion.html. Accessed 10 July, 2015.

  • Cardona, G., & Sanz, J. P. (2015). Publication analysis of the contact lens field: What are the current topics of interest? Journal of Optometry, 8(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Erez, K., Ben-Avraham, D., & Havlin, S. (2001). Breakdown of the Internet under intentional attack. Physical Review Letters, 86(16), 3682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrin, A. (2013, April 10). 2014 budget: DOD budget includes boosts for cyber, future priorities. FCW. http://fcw.com/articles/2013/04/10/dod-budget.aspx. Accessed 10 July, 2015.

  • Crowley, E. (2003). Information system security curricula development. In Proceedings of the 4th annual conference on information technology curriculum (pp. 249–255). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Department of Defense. (2010). Joint publication 1-02: Department of defense dictionary of military and associated terms. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlamini, M., Eloff, M., & Eloff, J. (2009). Information security: The moving target. Computers & Security, 28(3–4), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom, S. B. (2003). Author co-citation analysis using custom bibliographic databases: An introduction to the SAS approach. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenauer, L., & Gligor, V. D. (2002, November). A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on computer and communications security, Washington, DC.

  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. L., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, S., Hofmeyr, S., Somayaji, A., & Longstaff, T. (1996, May). A sense of self for Unix processes. In 1996 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (pp. 120–128). New York, NY: IEEE.

  • Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tsudik, G., & Tuecke, S. (1998). A security architecture for computational grids. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on computer and communications security (pp. 83–92). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Fuchs, L., Pernul, G., & Sandhu, R. (2011). Roles in information security—A survey and classification of the research area. Computers & Security, 30(8), 748–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A New dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2006). Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on computer and communications security (pp. 89–98). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Hammonds, G. L. (1993). Confidentiality, integrity, assured service: Tying security all together. In Proceedings on the 1991–1993 workshop on new security paradigms (pp. 48–52). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr, S. A., Forrest, S., & Somayaji, A. (1998). Intrusion detection using sequences of system calls. Journal of Computer Security, 6(3), 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2015, April). IMF world economic outlook [Data file]. Retrieved 10 July, 2015 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx.

  • Jacsó, P. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Information Review, 33(4), 831–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. (2015). The birth of cyberwar. Political Geography, 46(2015), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., & Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparison of citations in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. H. (2008). How to identify emerging research fields using scientometrics: An example in the field of Information Security. Scientometrics, 76(3), 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Kraus, K. L., & Couldwell, W. T. (2009). Use of the h index in neurosurgery: Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery, 111(2), 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Ning, P., & Li, R. (2005). Establishing pairwise keys in distributed sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC), 8(1), 41–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, K. M., & Sharp, T. (2011). America’s cyber future: Security and prosperity in the information age (Vol. I). Washington, DC: Center for a New American Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maconachy, V. W., Schou, C. D., Ragsdale, D., & Welch, D. (2001, June). A model for information assurance: An integrated approach. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2001 IEEE workshop on information assurance and security, West Point, NY.

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meushaw, R. (2012). Developing a blueprint for a science of cyber security. Guest Editor’s Column. The Next Wave, 19(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, F., Paarmann, D., D’Souza, M., Olson, R., Glass, E. M., Kubal, M., et al. (2008). The metagenomics RAST server—A public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1), 386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., & Martens, B. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegon, F., Chinchilla-Rodriquez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Alvarez, E., Munoz-Fernandez, F. J., Gonalez-Molina, A., et al. (2007). Coverage analysis of scopus: A metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (2013). Fiscal year 2012 report to Congress on the implementation of the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oree, W. L. (2013). Analysis of the Unites States Computer Emergency Readiness Team’s (U.S. CERT) Einstein III intrusion detection system, and its impact on privacy (Master’s thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.

  • Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2001). Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters, 86(14), 3200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, L.C., Cooper, S., Hawthorne, E. K., Wetzel, S., Brynieisson, A., Gokce, G., et al. (2011, June). Information assurance in two- and four-year institutions. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 16th annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education—Working group reports, New York, NY.

  • Pinto, M. (2015). Viewing and exploring the subject area of information literacy assessment in higher education (2000–2011). Scientometrics, 102(1), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. S. (1978). Toward a model for scientific indicators. In E. Yehuda, J. Lederberg, R. K. Merton, A. Thackray, & H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of scientific indicators (pp. 69–96). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnasingham, S., & Hebert, P. D. (2007). BOLD: The barcode of life data system. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7(3), 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. F., & Chen, H. (2007). Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorissa, A., & Yuan, X. (2012). Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 48(1), 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelfeld, A., & Myers, A. C. (2003). Language-based information-flow security. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz-Casado, E., Garcia-Zorita, J. C., Serrano-Lopez, A. E., Larsen, B., & Ingwersen, P. (2013). Renewable energy research 1995–2009: A case study of wind power research in EU, Spain, and Germany and Denmark. Scientometrics, 95(1), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighi, M. (2015). Using of co-word analysis method in mapping of the structure of scientific fields (case study: The field of informetrics). Journal of Information Processing and Management, 30(2), 373–396.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Siponen, M. T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2007). A review of information security issues and respective research contributions. SIGMIS Database, 38(1), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solms, B. (2001). Information security—A multidimensional discipline. Computers & Security, 20(6), 504–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solms, R., & Niekerk, J. (2013). From information security to cyber security. Computers and Security, 38(October), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tabah, A. N. (1999). Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 249–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A., & Tijssen, R. (1993). The neural net of neural network research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 26(1), 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, R. B., Dampier, D. A., & Warkentin, M. B. (2004). Building an information education program. In Proceedings of the first annual conference on information security curriculum development (pp. 41–45). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Vogel, R. (2012). The visible colleges of management and organization studies: A bibliometric analysis of academic journals. Organization Studies, 33(8), 1015–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waaijer, C. J., & Palmblad, M. (2015). Bibliometric mapping: Eight decades of analytical chemistry, with special focus on the use of mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 87(9), 4588–4596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2009). Principles of information security (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, G., & Pietikainen, M. (2007). Dynamic texture recognition using local binary patterns with an application to facial expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(6), 915–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. New York, NY: Morgan & Claypool.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Long Island University Post, 720 Northern Boulevard, Brookville, NY, 11548-1300, USA

    Nicholas V. Olijnyk

Authors
  1. Nicholas V. Olijnyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas V. Olijnyk.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Annual publication output for the information security specialty
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olijnyk, N.V. A quantitative examination of the intellectual profile and evolution of information security from 1965 to 2015. Scientometrics 105, 883–904 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1708-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1708-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation