Skip to main content
Log in

Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the incorporation of universities’ third mission into their traditional teaching and academic research activities, there has been a burgeoning literature on how the third mission influences universities’ academic research, though there is little research on its impact on universities’ traditional mission—teaching. This study thus intends to strengthen our understanding of the relationships among universities’ three missions by examining the relationship between university and industry collaboration and university teaching performance. Thanks to a unique combined dataset from 61 universities from 2009 to 2013, empirical results indicate that there are distinct effects of collaboration channels on teaching performance. Specifically, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between academic commercialization and teaching performance, while there is a U-shaped relationship between academic engagement and teaching performance. Academic commercialization and engagement yield a combined positive effect on teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: Conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Garcia, J. L. S., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2015). University–industry partnerships for the provision of R&D services. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1407–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & Silva, E. M. D. P. E. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees versus equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, H., & Randazzese, L. (1999). University–industry relations: The next 4 years and beyon. In L. M. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Creating and innovation policy that works. Combridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, H., & Moschini, G. (2009). US universities’ net returns from patenting and licensing: A quantile regression analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutrenit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Yang, X., & Chen, L. (2015). Diversified resources and academic influence: Patterns of university–industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities. Scientometrics, 104(2), 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2003). University patenting and its effects on academic research, SPRU Electronic Working paper series no. 99, Brighton, SPRU.

  • Gluck, M. E., Blumenthal, D., & Stoto, M. A. (1987). University–industry relationships in the life sciences: Implications for students and post-doctoral fellows. Research Policy, 16(6), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US. Japan, and South Korea, Technovation, 34(10), 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. S. (1999). Does university–industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science & Technology, Summer, 99(16), 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv, P. (2014). How does openness affect innovation? Evidence from national key laboratories in China. Science and Public Policy, 41, 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of university technology transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-Based Ventures and Public Support Mechanisms, R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Scarpinato, M. (2012). The effects of universities’ proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration. China Economic Review, 23(3), 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. (2015). Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations. Research Policy, 44(5), 1133–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutz, J. (2000). The university–industry–government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A., Dutrenit, G., Sampedro, J. L., & Becerra, N. (2011). What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavakova, B. (1998). The new social contract between governments, universities and society: Has the old one failed? Minerva, 36(3), 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Huang, J., Chen, Y., Pan, X., & Chen, J. (2013). Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective. Scientometrics, 97(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chen, J. (2012). How Chinese firms employ open innovation to strengthen their innovative performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 59(3/4), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2013). The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 22(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by national Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71302133), Youth Project of Ministry of education, Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Funding (Grant No. 13YJC790154), Key Research Base of Sichuan Social Science (System Science and Enterprise Development Center) (Grant No. Xq15B02), and funding of Sichuan University (skqx201502).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiongfeng Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Hu, R., Li, W. et al. Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement. Scientometrics 106, 1037–1055 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1818-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1818-9

Keywords

Navigation