Abstract
With the incorporation of universities’ third mission into their traditional teaching and academic research activities, there has been a burgeoning literature on how the third mission influences universities’ academic research, though there is little research on its impact on universities’ traditional mission—teaching. This study thus intends to strengthen our understanding of the relationships among universities’ three missions by examining the relationship between university and industry collaboration and university teaching performance. Thanks to a unique combined dataset from 61 universities from 2009 to 2013, empirical results indicate that there are distinct effects of collaboration channels on teaching performance. Specifically, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between academic commercialization and teaching performance, while there is a U-shaped relationship between academic engagement and teaching performance. Academic commercialization and engagement yield a combined positive effect on teaching.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: Conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 473–484.
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Garcia, J. L. S., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2015). University–industry partnerships for the provision of R&D services. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1407–1413.
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734–1739.
Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & Silva, E. M. D. P. E. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453.
Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees versus equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 385–392.
Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26.
Brooks, H., & Randazzese, L. (1999). University–industry relations: The next 4 years and beyon. In L. M. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Creating and innovation policy that works. Combridge: MIT Press.
Bulut, H., & Moschini, G. (2009). US universities’ net returns from patenting and licensing: A quantile regression analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 123–137.
Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
Dutrenit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526.
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
Fan, X., Yang, X., & Chen, L. (2015). Diversified resources and academic influence: Patterns of university–industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities. Scientometrics, 104(2), 489–509.
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2003). University patenting and its effects on academic research, SPRU Electronic Working paper series no. 99, Brighton, SPRU.
Gluck, M. E., Blumenthal, D., & Stoto, M. A. (1987). University–industry relationships in the life sciences: Implications for students and post-doctoral fellows. Research Policy, 16(6), 327–336.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.
Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US. Japan, and South Korea, Technovation, 34(10), 605–616.
Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. S. (1999). Does university–industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science & Technology, Summer, 99(16), 74–75.
Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39.
Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269–290.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.
Lv, P. (2014). How does openness affect innovation? Evidence from national key laboratories in China. Science and Public Policy, 41, 180–193.
McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of university technology transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57–67.
Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-Based Ventures and Public Support Mechanisms, R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.
Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 259–271.
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1), 50–66.
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Scarpinato, M. (2012). The effects of universities’ proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration. China Economic Review, 23(3), 639–650.
Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. (2015). Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations. Research Policy, 44(5), 1133–1143.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268.
Sutz, J. (2000). The university–industry–government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279–290.
Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117–1147.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104.
Torres, A., Dutrenit, G., Sampedro, J. L., & Becerra, N. (2011). What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 31–42.
Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596–608.
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441.
Vavakova, B. (1998). The new social contract between governments, universities and society: Has the old one failed? Minerva, 36(3), 209–228.
Wang, Y., Huang, J., Chen, Y., Pan, X., & Chen, J. (2013). Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective. Scientometrics, 97(2), 207–222.
Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chen, J. (2012). How Chinese firms employ open innovation to strengthen their innovative performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 59(3/4), 235–254.
Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2013). The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 22(1), 63–76.
Acknowledgments
This research is funded by national Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71302133), Youth Project of Ministry of education, Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Funding (Grant No. 13YJC790154), Key Research Base of Sichuan Social Science (System Science and Enterprise Development Center) (Grant No. Xq15B02), and funding of Sichuan University (skqx201502).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Hu, R., Li, W. et al. Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement. Scientometrics 106, 1037–1055 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1818-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1818-9