Abstract
Diachronous studies of obsolescence categorized articles into three general types: “flashes in the pan”, “sleeping beauties” and “normal articles”. These studies used either quartiles or averages to define thresholds on sleeping and awakening periods. However, such average- and quartile-based criteria, sometimes, are less effective in distinguishing “flashes in the pan” and “sleeping beauties” from normal articles due to the arbitrariness of the manner in which thresholds are determined. In this investigation, we propose a vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles as an alternative to these criteria. The obsolescence vector is designed as O = (G s, A −), with G s as a parameter affecting the shape of citation curves and A − as a parameter detecting drastic fluctuation of citation curves. We collected 50,789 articles authored by Nobel laureates during 1900–2012. Applying our criteria to this dataset, we compared the obsolescence vector with average- and quartile-based criteria. Our findings show that the proposed obsolescence vector is different from and serves as an alternative to the average- and quartile-based criteria.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt, H. A. (1981). Long-term citation histories of astronomical papers. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 93, 207–210.
Avramescu, A. (1979). Actuality and obsolescence of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(5), 296–303.
Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596–602.
Brookes, B. C. (1970). The growth, utility, and obsolescence of scientific periodical literature. Journal of Documentation, 26(4), 283–294.
Burrell, Q. L. (1991). The Bradford distribution and the Gini index. Scientometrics, 21(2), 181–194.
Burrell, Q. L. (2002). The nth-citation distribution and obsolescence. Scientometrics, 53(3), 309–323.
Burton, R. E., & Kebler, R. W. (1960). The “half-life” of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation, 11(1), 18–22.
Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 286–306.
Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a “sell-by-date”? A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 329–339.
Cunningham, S. J., & Bocock, D. (1995). Obsolescence of computing literature. Scientometrics, 34(2), 255–262.
Egghe, L., & Rao, I. K. R. (1992). Citation age data and the obsolescence function: Fits and explanations. Information and Processing Management, 28(2), 201–217.
Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition-why? Current Contents, 4, 488–493.
Garfield, E. (1989). More delayed recognition. Part 1. Examples from the genetics of color blindness, the entropy of short-term memory, phosphoinositides, and polymer rheology. Current Contents, 38, 3–8.
Glänzel, W. (2004). Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses. Scientometrics, 60(3), 511–522.
Guo, J. L., & Suo, Q. (2014). Comment on” Quantifying long-term scientific impact”. Science, 345(6193), 149.
Hsu, C. P., Song, X., & Marcus, R. A. (1997). Time-dependent Stokes shift and its calculation from solvent dielectric dispersion data. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 101(14), 2546–2551.
Hugget, S. (2010). Does a Nobel Prize lead to more citations. Research Trends. Retrieved April 7, 2015 from http://www.researchtrends.com/issue20-november-2010/does-a-nobel-prize-lead-to-more-citations.
Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426–7431.
Landsteiner, K., & Harte, R. A. (1940). On group specific a substances IV. The substance from hog stomach. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 71(4), 551–562.
Li, J. (2014). Citation curves of “all-elements-sleeping-beauties”: “Flash in the pan” first and then “delayed recognition”. Scientometrics, 100(2), 595–601.
Li, J., Shi, D., Zhao, S. X., & Ye, F. Y. (2014). A study of the “heartbeat spectra” for “sleeping beauties”. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 493–502.
Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92(3), 795–799.
Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2014). A probe into the citation patterns of high-quality and high-impact publications. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 19(2), 31–47.
Mazloumian, A., Eom, Y., Helbing, D., Lozano, S., & Fortunato, S. (2011). How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e18975.
Nakamoto, H. (1988). Synchronous and diachronous citation distributions. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 157–163). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Persson, O. (2005). “Citation indexes for science”—A 50 year citation history. Current Science, 89(9), 1503–1504.
Price, D. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non-science. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3–22). Lexington, MA: Heath.
Price, D. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306.
Redner, S. (2005). Citation statistics from more than a century of physical review. Physics Today, 58(1), 49–54.
Rousseau, R. (1999). A weak goodness-of-fit test for rank-frequency distributions. In Proceedings of the 7th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 421–430). Universidad de Colima (Mexico).
Stent, G. S. (1972). Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227(6), 84–93.
Sun, J., Min, C., & Li, J. (2015). A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 15th conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Istanbul (Turkey) (pp. 317–327).
van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2005). Signals in science—On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in Science. Scientometrics, 64(2), 209–233.
van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472.
Vlachý, J. (1985). Citation histories of scientific publications. The data sources. Scientometrics, 7(3), 505–528.
Wang, D., Song, C., & Barabási, A. L. (2013). Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, 342(6154), 127–132.
Wyatt, H. V. (1961). Knowledge and prematurity-journey from transformation to DNA. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 18(2), 149–156.
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Nos. 71203193 and 71273125).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, J., Min, C. & Li, J. A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles. Scientometrics 107, 745–757 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1884-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1884-7