Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proving ground for social network analysis in the emerging research area “Internet of Things” (IoT)

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the structural patterns of international co-institutions and co-authors in science citation index papers in the research domain of the Internet of Things (IoT). The study uses measures from the social network analysis method, including degree centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and effectiveness, to investigate the effects of social networks. In addition, the study proposes a prediction model for assessing the semantic relevancy of research papers in the field of IoT (Regarding social science approach on semantic analysis, refer to Jung and Park in Gov Inf Q, 2015a. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.010, 32(3):353–358, 2015b). For the analysis, 815 research papers were selected from the Web of Science database for the 1993–2015 period. Empirical analysis results identify China as the most central country, followed by the U.S., Spain, the U.K., and Sweden, in terms of the co-authored network. Similarly, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Shanghai Jiao Tong University were ranked first, third, and fourth, respectively, among the top five co-institutions. Northeastern University (U.S.) and the University of Surrey (U.K.) ranked second and fifth, respectively. A confusion matrix was used to validate the accuracy of the proposed model. The accuracy of the prediction model was 76.84 %, whereas recall for the model (ability of a search to find all relevant items in the corpus) was 94.47 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Ashton, K. (2009). That “Internet of Things” thing. RFID Journal. http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/print/4986.

  • Atzori, L., Lera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. A., Lee, M. S., Jiang, K., & Park, H. W. (2015). The flow of international students from a macro perspective: A network analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education,. doi:10.1080/03057925.2015.1015965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. A., Park, H. W., Jiang, K., Tang, C., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). A multi-level network analysis of web-citations among the world’s universities. Scientometrics, 99(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Massachusetts: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., Yang, J. S., & Park, H. W. (2015). The Triple Helix and International Collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(1), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2).

  • Domingo, M. C. (2012). An overview of the internet of things for people with disabilities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(2), 584–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C., Borgatti, S. P., & White, D. R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13, 141–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451.

  • Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.

  • Harbor research report: IoT in the News: China Invests Heavily in the Internet of Things http://harborresearch.com/iot-in-the-news-china-invests-heavily-in-the-iot/.

  • IoT Council a think-tank for the Internet of Things. http://www.theinternetofthings.eu/what-is-the-internet-of-things. 11 December 2015.

  • ITU-T Y.2060. (2012). http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/1000/11559.

  • Jung, K., & Park, H. W. (2015a). Tracing interorganizational information networks during the emergency response period: A webometric approach to the 2012 Gumi chemical spill in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly,. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K., & Park, H. W. (2015b). A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea’s “Open Public Data” policy. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graph. Information Letters, 31(1), 7–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, G. F., Lee, S., Park, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2016). Theories in communication science: a structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1822-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2013). International collaboration within electronic government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 182–193. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L., & Park, H. W. (2015). Diagnosing “collaborative culture” of biomedical science in South Korea: Misoriented knowledge, competition and failing collaboration. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 9, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K.-S., Park, H. W., So, M. H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s National Research System? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, M., & Gagné, J. (1994). International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science. Scientometrics, 31(3), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2007). “Betweenness centrality” as an indicator of the “interdisciplinarity” of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C., Park, H. W., & Adams, J. (2013). International collaboration in science: The global map and the network. El professional de la información, 22(1), 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Xu, L., & Zhao, S. (2015). The internet of things: A survey. Information Systems Frontiers,. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Luo, X., Polgar, M., & Cao, Y. (2010). Social network analysis of a criminal hackers community. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(Winter), 31–41.

  • Matthew, W. L, Lariviere, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033339.

  • Michel, G., Eckert, D., Gingras, Y., Jegou, L., Lariviere, V., & Millard, B. (2013). Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007). Urban Studies. doi:10.1177/0042098013506043.

  • Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F. D., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosbah-Natanson, S., & Gingras, Y. (2014). The globalization of social sciences? Evidence from a quantitative analysis of 30 years of production, collaboration and citations in the social sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology,. doi:10.1177/0011392113498866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS, 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28, 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W. (2012). How do social scientists use link data from search engines to understand Internet-based political and electoral communication. Quality & Quantity, 46(2), 679–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “big data” research. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 756–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, C., Liu, C., & Jayawardena, S. (2015). The emerging internet of things marketplace from an industrial perspective: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(3), 585–598. doi:10.1109/TETC.2015.2390034.

  • Shapiro, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Regional development in South Korea: Accounting for research area in centrality and networks. Scientometrics, 90(1), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M., So, M. H., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 845–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration: A synthesis of challenges and strategies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., & Wang. N. (2010). Future internet: The internet of things. In 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE) (Vol. 5, pp. V5–376–V5–380). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579543.

  • The Growth Game-Changer: How the Industrial Internet of Things can drive progress and prosperity https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Dualpub_18/Accenture-Industrial-Internet-Things-Growth-Game-Changer.pdf. 12 December 2015.

  • Tomas M., Kai C., Greg C., & Jeffrey D. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.

  • Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., & Michahelles, F. (2011). Architecting the internet of things (p. 4). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., & Sundmaeker, H. (2009). Internet of things strategic research roadmap. Brusseles: European Commission Information Society and Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., & Xu, L. (2015). The internet of things—A survey of topics and trends. Information Systems Frontiers,. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., He, W., & Li, S. (2014). Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(4), 2233–2243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, B. N., Lee, T. S., & Lee, T. P. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of the Internet of Things (IoT) FIELD (2000–2014): A co-word analysis. The Journal of Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1740-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, L.-C., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R. A., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2006). Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the collnet network. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1599–1613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea

    Arif Mehmood & Gyu Sang Choi

  2. Royal Academy of Doctors of Spain, Madrid, Spain

    Otto F. von Feigenblatt

  3. Department of Media and Communication, Interdisciplinary Program of East Asian Cultural Studies, Interdisciplinary Program of Digital Convergence Business, Cyber Emotions Research Institute, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea

    Han Woo Park

Authors
  1. Arif Mehmood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gyu Sang Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Otto F. von Feigenblatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Han Woo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Woo Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehmood, A., Choi, G.S., von Feigenblatt, O.F. et al. Proving ground for social network analysis in the emerging research area “Internet of Things” (IoT). Scientometrics 109, 185–201 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1931-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1931-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation