Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of environmental laws publications in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Index: a bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of environmental law research in the natural science and social science fields from a bibliometric perspective. Document type, publication language, annual output, and distributions of countries were quantitatively characterized and compared in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) and the Social Science Index (SSCI). The citation history of highly cited articles and word analysis were used to examine research tendencies and “hotspots” in environmental law research. The results show that from 1992 to 2014 SCI-EXPANDED has published more research in environmental laws than SSCI except in 2011. The USA is the most productive country in both databases. Developing countries such as China, India, and Brazil are among the top 10 productive countries in SCI-EXPANDED, while in that of SSCI, China is the only developing country. The USA had the most frequent collaborations with other countries both in SCI-EXPANDED and SSCI; collaborations were more frequent in SSCI than in the SCI-EXPANDED. Words analysis reveals that “sustainability”, “compliance”, and “environmental management” are key issues in SSCI, while articles in SCI-EXPANDED pay more attention to “risk assessment”, “recycling”, “wastewater treatment”, and “temperature”. “China” is a key issue in research in both natural science and social science field, which indicates the rapid development of environmental law research in China as well as the growing concerns of China’s environmental law issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, E. (2012). Which science? Whose science? How scientific disciplines can shape environmental law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 79, 471–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, V., & Lind, N. C. (1991). Citation life cycles of ten citation classics. Scientometrics, 22(2), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, K. Y., & Ho, Y. S. (2015). An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Current Science, 108(5), 933–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the Essential Science Indicators database of the Institute for Scientific Information. Scientometrics, 87(3), 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness. The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, F. M., de Lacerda, P. S. B., & Jones, J. (2005). Sustainable development and Green Chemistry. Quimíca Nova, 28(1), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., & Shi, L. (2014). Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, M., Wang, B., & Wu, Y. (2014). Sources of China’s economic growth: An empirical analysis based on the BML index with green growth accounting. Sustainability, 6(9), 5983–6004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Karavasiou, A. I., & Bliziotis, I. A. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine. Acta Tropica, 99(2), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 379(1), 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Mapping of drinking water research: A bibliometric analysis of research output during 1992–2011. Science of the Total Environment, 443, 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1990). KeyWords Plus: ISI’s breakthrough retrieval method. Part 1. Expanding your searching power on Current Contents on Diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. B., & Henrikson, J. H. (1997). How well does journal impact work in the assessment of papers onclinical physiology and nuclear medicine? Clinical Physiology, 17(4), 409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2012). Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20(3), 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2013). The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1297–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2014). Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S., & Kahn, M. (2014). A bibliometric study of highly cited reviews in the Science Citation Index Expanded™. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S., Satoh, H., & Lin, S. Y. (2010). Japanese lung cancer research trends and performance in Science Citation Index. Internal Medicine, 49(20), 2219–2228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, J. C., & Sheen, J. (1994). Sugar sensing in higher plants. Plant Cell, 6(11), 1665–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashiwagi, T., Du, F. M., Douglas, J. F., Winey, K. I., Harris, R. H., & Shields, J. R. (2005). Nanoparticle networks reduce the flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Nature Materials, 4(12), 928–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M., & Damon, L. A. (1999). EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1), 1–25.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., & Hage, J. J. (2006). Measurement, calculation, and normal range of the ankle-arm index: A bibliometric analysis and recommendation for standardization. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 20(2), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Q., & Wai, C. M. (2001). Supercritical fluid extraction in herbal and natural product studies—A practical review. Talanta, 53(4), 771–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. F., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis. Global and Planetary Change, 77(1–2), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., & Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. P., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). The top-cited wetland articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: Characteristics and hotspots. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(3), 1039–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, N., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric study of the trend in articles related to risk assessment published in Science Citation Index. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 16(4), 801–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mela, G. S., & Cimmino, M. A. (1998). An overview of rheumatological research in the European Union. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 57(11), 643–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, Z., Bu, S., & Xue, B. (2014). Environmental legislation in China: Achievements, challenges and trends. Sustainability, 6(12), 8967–8979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, S. T. (2003). Novel catalysts for advanced hydroprocessing: Transition metal phosphides. Journal of Catalysis, 216(1–2), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Yuan, B., Ma, X., & Chen, X. (2014). The impact of international trade on China’s industrial carbon emissions since its entry into WTO. Energy Policy, 69, 624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revesz, R. L. (1992). Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the “race-to-the-bottom” rationale for federal environmental regulation. New York University Law Review, 67(6), 1210–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. P. (2012). The costs of environmental regulation in a concentrated industry. Econometrica, 80(3), 1019–1061.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stanislaus, A., Marafi, A., & Rana, M. S. (2010). Recent advances in the science and technology of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) production. Catalysis Today, 153(1), 1–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. E. (2014). The political logic of China’s new environmental courts. China Journal, 72, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. S., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of research on estuary pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergidis, P. I., Karavasiou, A. I., Paraschakis, K., Bliziotis, I. A., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 24(5), 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescovi, E. G., Soncini, F. C., & Groisman, E. A. (1996). Mg2+ as an extracellular signal: Environmental regulation of Salmonella virulence. Cell, 84(1), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachy, J. (1985). Scientometric analyses in physics a bibliography of publication, citation and mobility studies. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 35(12), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. H., Li, J. F., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Research articles published in water resources journals: A bibliometric analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 28(1–3), 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Liu, M., Hong, S., & Zhuang, Y. (2013). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of GPS research from 1991–2010. Scientometrics, 95(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlin, C. (2005). Most cited journal articles in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 47(15), 955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, S. D., Zhang, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. F., Xie, S. D., & Ho, Y. S. (2010). A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics, 83(2), 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S., He, C., & Liu, Y. (2014). Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’s pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 55, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

    Rongzhen Ma & Yuh-Shan Ho

  2. Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, 41354, Taichung County, Taiwan

    Rongzhen Ma & Yuh-Shan Ho

Authors
  1. Rongzhen Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuh-Shan Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuh-Shan Ho.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, R., Ho, YS. Comparison of environmental laws publications in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Index: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 109, 227–239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2010-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2010-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation