Skip to main content
Log in

Subject–method topic network analysis in communication studies

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication studies depend on information and communication technology (ICT) and the behavior of people using the technology. ICT enables individuals to transfer information quickly via various media. Social changes are occurring rapidly and their studies are growing in number. Thus, a tool to extract knowledge to comprehend the quickly changing dynamics of communication studies is required. We propose a subject–method topic network analysis method that integrates topic modeling analysis and network analysis to understand the state of communication studies. Our analysis focuses on the relationships between topics classified as subjects and methods. From the relationships, we examine the societal and perspective changes relative to emerging media technologies. We apply our method to all papers listed in the Journal Citation Reports Social Science Citation Index as communication studies between 1990 and 2014. The study results allow us to identify popular subjects, methods, and subject–method pairs in proportion and relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad, L. (2014). Media literacy for older people facing the digital divide: The e-inclusion programmes design/Diseño de programas de e-inclusión para alfabetización mediática de personas mayores. Comunicar, 21(42), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., & O’Reilly, M. (2013). Either/or questions in child psychiatric assessments: The effect of the seriousness and order of the alternatives. Discourse Studies, 16(3), 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, G. A., Huh, C., Kim, Y., & Park, H. W. (2011). Citations among communication journals and other disciplines: A network analysis. Scientometrics, 88, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). The craft of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks, 19(3), 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (1989). All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing and Management, 25(3), 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabero-Almenara, J., & Marín-Díaz, V. (2014). Educational possibilities of social networks and group work. University students’ perceptions. Comunicar, 21(42), 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2011). Communication as social science (and more). International Journal of Communication, 5, 1479–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. M. (2009). Beyond the dichotomy of communication studies. Asian Journal of Communication, 19(4), 398–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., & Khang, H. (2006). The state of internet-related research in communications, marketing, and advertising: 1994–2003. Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. J., Barnett, G. A., Kim, K., & Lackoff, D. (2013). An analysis on communication theory and discipline. Scientometrics, 95(3), 985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Potter, W., & Dupagne, M. (1994). A status report on methods used in mass communication research. Journalism Educator, 48, 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R. T. (1993). Why are there so many communication theories? Journal of Communication, 43, 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, M. (2013). Machine learning with MALLET. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu/mallet-tutorial.pdf.

  • Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A. K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaenens, F. (2014). Articulations of queer resistance on the small screen. Continuum, 28(4), 520–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, T. H. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 505–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, E. J., & Gantz, W. (1996). A content analysis of three mass communication research traditions: Social science, interpretive studies, and critical analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. M., & Harris, A. (2015). Queer superheroes: The impossibility of difference, a neoliberal promise of equal (teacher) love. Continuum, 29(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. J., Bolkan, S., Holmgren, J. L., & Tutzauer, F. (2016). Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network. Scientometrics, 106(1), 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, K. N., Lee, C. J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444810390342.

  • Humphreys, L., Gill, P., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2014). Twitter: A content analysis of personal information. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 843–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwabuchi, K. (2010). Globalization, East Asian media cultures and their publics. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamhawi, R., & Weaver, D. (2003). Mass communication research trends from 1980 to 1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Örnebring, H. (2015). Hyperlinking practices in Swedish online news 2007–2013: The rise, fall, and stagnation of hyperlinking as a journalistic tool. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 847–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khang, H., Ki, E. J., & Ye, L. (2012). Social media research in advertising, communication, marketing, and public relations, 1997–2010. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S. (2010). Intercultural communication in Asia: Current state and future prospects. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. T., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication research about the Internet: A thematic meta-analysis. New Media & Society, 4(4), 518–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. J., & Sohn, D. (2015). Mapping the social capital research in communication a bibliometric analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. doi:10.1177/1077699015610074.

  • Lo, V. H., & Wei, R. (2010). New media and political communication in Asia: A critical assessment of research on media and politics, 1988–2008. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luff, R., Byatt, D., & Martin, D. (2015). Review of the typology of research methods within the social sciences (p. 27). Southampton: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manosevitch, E., Steinfeld, N., & Lev-On, A. (2014). Promoting online deliberation quality: Cognitive cues matter. Information, Communication & Society, 17(10), 1177–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, R. (2015). Vicarious experience: Experimentally testing the effects of empathy for media characters with severe depression and the intervening role of perceived similarity. Health Communication, 30(11), 1122–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, L. M., & Sigurdson, K. J. (2014). Depression is to diabetes as antidepressants are to insulin: The unraveling of an analogy? Health Communication, 29(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J. E., Rivkin, J. W., Ryall, M. D., & Strategy Research Initiative. (2010). The strategy research initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy. Strategic Organization, 8(4), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals. Scientometrics, 81(1), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T. Q., Zhang, L., Zhong, Z. J., & Zhu, J. J. (2012). Mapping the landscape of Internet studies: Text mining of social science journal articles 2000–2009. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444812462846.

  • Potter, W. J., & Riddle, K. (2007). A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(1), 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restivo, M., & Van De Rijt, A. (2014). No praise without effort: Experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. (1988). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977–1985 cliques and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 256–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, C. Y. (2010). The rise of Asian communication research: A citation study of SSCI journals. Asian Journal of Communication, 20(2), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taipale, S., & Fortunati, L. (2014). Capturing methodological trends in mobile communication studies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, T. K. (2001). The status of Internet-based research in five leading communication journals, 1994–1999. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toutanova, K., Klein, D., & Manning, C. (2013). Stanford Core NLP. The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/corenlp.shtml.

  • Trumbo, C. W. (2004). Research methods in mass communication research: A census of eight journals 1990–2000. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, R. (2014). Places nearby: Facebook as a location-based social media platform. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1087–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E. (2015). Research dynamics, impact, and dissemination: A topic-level analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2357–2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2014). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication journals from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444813520477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015S1A3A2046711). This work was supported in part by the Yonsei University Future-leading Research Initiative of 2015 [2014-22-0116].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Song.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 3.

Table 3 Journal list

Appendix 2

See Table 4.

Table 4 Topics and terms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Jung, H. & Song, M. Subject–method topic network analysis in communication studies. Scientometrics 109, 1761–1787 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2135-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2135-7

Keywords

Navigation