Abstract
This study aims to employ technology–function based patent analysis to identify the important technologies of cloud computing. This study exploits the Stanford parser and association rule to extract and separate the information concerning technologies and functions from patent text. Based on the results of the technology–function matrix, this study employs technology network analysis to investigate technology change. Moreover, this study proposes a technology–function matrix analysis diagram (TFMAD) and applies the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to identify the most important technologies of cloud computing. Among the three classes of cloud computing, infrastructure as a service has the largest number of patents and the connections between patents are close, but the platform as a service has the highest patent growth rate. Based on the analysis of TFMAD, this study shows that technological developments related to computing device and virtual machines are of particular importance to the cloud computing industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas, A., Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 37, 3–13.
Cahlik, T. (2000). Comparison of the maps of science. Scientometrics, 49(3), 373–387.
Chang, P. L., Wu, C. C., & Leu, H. J. (2010). Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display. Scientometrics, 82(1), 5–19.
Cheng, T. Y. (2012). A new method of creating technology–function matrix for systematic innovation without expert. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7(1), 118–127.
Cheng, T. Y., & Wang, M. T. (2013). The patent-classification technology/function matrix—a systematic method for design around. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18, 158–167.
Cong, H., & Tong, L. H. (2008). Grouping of TRIZ inventive principles to facilitate automatic patent classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 788–795.
Dewulf, S. (2006). Directed variation: Variation of properties for new or improved function product DNA, a base for ‘connect and develop’. ETRIA TRIZ Futures.
Dinh, H. T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., & Wang, P. (2013). A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 13(18), 1587–1611.
Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 279–308.
Fattori, M., Pedrazzi, G., & Turra, R. (2003). Text mining to patent mapping: A practical business case. World Patent Information, 25(4), 335–342.
Han, T., & Sim, K. M. (2010). An ontology-enhanced cloud service discovery system. In International multi conference of engineers and computer scientists (IMEC 2010) (pp. 644–649), Hong Kong.
Hsu, Y. L., Hsu, P. E., Hung, Y. C., & Xiao, Y. D. (2010). Development and application of a patent-based design around process. In ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. 91–100), American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Hu, C. P., Hu, J. M., Deng, S. L., & Liu, Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics, 97(2), 369–382.
Huang, J. Y. (2016a). Patent portfolio analysis of the cloud computing industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 39, 45–64.
Huang, J. Y. (2016b). Patent network analysis of cloud computing by text mining. Journal of Technology, 31(2), 127–146.
Huang, J. Y. (2016c). An analysis of the intellectual structure of the cloud patents of SaaS. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1259470.
Liu, G. (2013). Visualization of patents and papers in terahertz technology: A comparative study. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1037–1056.
Liu, F., Tong, J., Mao, J., Bohn, R., Messina, J., Badger, L., & Leaf, D. (2011). NIST cloud computing reference architecture. NIST special publication, 500-292.
Liu, C. Y., & Yang, J. C. (2008). Decoding patent information using patent maps. Data Science Journal, 7, 14–22.
Liu, K., Yen, Y., & Kuo, Y. H. (2013). A quick approach to get a technology–function matrix for an interested technical topic of patents. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(6), 85–96.
McGonagle, J. J., & Vella, C. M. (2012). Proactive intelligence: The successful executive’s guide to intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
Park, H., Kim, K., Choi, S., & Yoon, J. (2013). A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2373–2390.
Sagar, V. B. R. V., & Abirami, S. (2014). Conceptual modeling of natural language functional requirements. Journal of Systems and Software, 88, 25–41.
Shih, M. J., Liu, D. R., & Hsu, M. L. (2010). Discovering competitive intelligence by mining changes in patent trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2882–2890.
Soo, V. W., Lin, S. Y., Yang, S. Y., Lin, S. N., & Cheng, S. L. (2006). A cooperative multi-agent platform for invention based on patent document analysis and ontology. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(4), 766–775.
Stanford. (2010). The Stanford Parser: A statistical parser. http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml.
Taghaboni-Dutta, F., Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., & Wu, H. Y. (2009). An Exploratory RFID Patent Analysis. Management Research News, 32(12), 1163–1176.
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2010). Graph mining applications to social network analysis. In Managing and Mining Graph Data (pp. 487–513). Springer US.
Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., & Kao, B. H. (2006). Automated patent document summarization for R&D intellectual property management. In 10th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, 2006, CSCWD’06 (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management, 43(5), 1216–1247.
Venters, W., & Whitley, E. A. (2012). A critical review of cloud computing: Researching desires and realities. Journal of Information Technology, 27(3), 179–197.
Xue, K. Y., Liou, C. L., & Huang, J. Y., (2011). Patent portfolio of cloud computing industry: a case study of Google. In Proceeding of 1th cross-strait academic and practice conference on trade and business management, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yeboah-Boateng, E. O., & Cudjoe-Seshie, S. (2013). Cloud computing: The emergence of application service providers (ASPs) in developing economies. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(5), 703–712.
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2012a). TrendPerceptor: A property–function based technology intelligence system for identifying technology trends from patents. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2927–2938.
Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2012b). An analysis of property–function based patent networks for strategic R&D planning in fast-moving industries: The case of silicon-based thin film solar cells. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 7709–7717.
Yoon, Y., & Lee, G. G. (2007). Efficient implementation of associative classifiers for document classification. Information Processing and Management, 43(2), 393–405.
Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2004). A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1), 37–50.
Zhang, Y. (2011). Analysis and evaluation of enterprise innovation ability conversions. International Journal of Innovative Management, Information & Production, 2(2), 39–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, JY., Hsu, HT. Technology–function matrix based network analysis of cloud computing. Scientometrics 113, 17–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2469-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2469-9