Skip to main content
Log in

RTRS: a recommender system for academic researchers

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ever-evolving nature of research works creates the cacophony of new topics incessantly resulting in an unstable state in every field of research. Researchers are disseminating their works producing a huge volume of articles. In fact, the spectacular growth in scholarly literature is widening the choice sets overwhelmingly for researchers. Consequently, they face difficulties in identifying a suitable topic of current importance from a plethora of research topics. This remains an ill-defined problem for researchers due to the overload of choices. The problem is even more severe for new researchers due to the lack of experience. Hence, there is a definite need for a system that would help researchers make decisions on appropriate topics. Recommender systems are good options for performing this very task. They have been proven to be useful for researchers to keep pace with research dynamics and at the same time to overcome the information overload problem by retrieving useful information from the large information space of scholarly literature. In this article, we present RTRS, a knowledge-based Research Topics Recommender System to assist both novice and experienced researchers in selecting research topics in their chosen field. The core of this system hinges upon bibliometric information of the literature. The system identifies active research topics in a particular area and recommends top N topics to the target users. The results obtained have proven useful to academic researchers, particularly novices, in making an early decision on research topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2009). Citation statistics. Statistical Science, 24(1), 1.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, D. K., & Chen, B-C. (2015). Statistical methods for recommender systems. Cambridge University Press.

  • Aggarwal, C. C. (2016). Recommender systems: The textbook. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. M., & Ismail, M. A. (2015). RESEARCH TOPICS RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR NOVICE RESEARCHERS.

  • Badiru, A. B. (1996). Selecting a research topic Project Management for Research (pp. 37–53). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (2014). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, J. A., Akhtar, U., Raza, S. A., & Ejaz, K. (2012). Selecting a research topic. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 62(2), 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik, R. (2008). Keyword extraction from abstracts and titles. Southeastcon, 2008. IEEE. doi:10.1109/SECON.2008.4494366.

  • Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F., Hernando, A., & Gutiérrez, A. (2013). Recommender systems survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, 46, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannan, G. D., Dumsha, J. Z., & Yens, D. P. (2013). A research primer: Basic guidelines for the novice researcher. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 113(7), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (2000). Encyclopedia of library and information systems. A. Kent (Ed.), 69(Suppl 32).

  • Cacheda, F., Carneiro, V., Fernández, D., & Formoso, V. (2011). Comparison of collaborative filtering algorithms: Limitations of current techniques and proposals for scalable, high-performance recommender systems. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 5(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5303–5310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace Manual.

  • Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2014). Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, A. K. (2015). Research evaluation metrics (Vol. 4). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrand, M. D., Kannan, P., Stemper, J. A., Butler, J. T., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. T. (2010). Automatically building research reading lists. Paper presented at the proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on recommender systems.

  • Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2010). A guide for novice researchers: Design and development research methods. Paper presented at the proceedings of informing science & IT education conference, InSITE.

  • Felfernig, A., & Burke, R. (2008). Constraint-based recommender systems: technologies and research issues. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 10th international conference on electronic commerce.

  • Gingras, Y. (2014). Criteria for evaluating indicators. Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (pp. 109).

  • Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004). Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22(1), 5–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D. G., Hearst, N., & Newman, T. (2001). Conceiving the research question. In Designing clinical research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (pp. 335).

  • Ismail, M. A., & Kareem, S. A. (2011). Identifying how novice researchers search, locate, choose and use web resources at the early stage of research. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(3), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 7(4), 373–397.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, J. A., Miller, B. N., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J. L., Gordon, L. R., & Riedl, J. (1997). GroupLens: Applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y. (2008). Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted collaborative filtering model. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining.

  • Koren, Y., & Bell, R. (2015). Advances in collaborative filtering. In Recommender systems handbook (pp. 77–118). Springer.

  • Kouki, A. B. (2012). Recommender System Performance Evaluation and Prediction: An Information Retrieval Perspective. PhD thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

  • Kurtz, M. J., & Henneken, E. A. (2012). Finding and recommending scholarly articles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1209.1318.

  • Le Hoang, S. (2015). HU-FCF plus plus: A novel hybrid method for the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 41, 207–222. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2015.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, P., Thiel, M., & Nürnberger, A. (2016). Unsupervised Extraction of Conceptual Keyphrases from Abstracts. Semanitic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources.

  • Middleton, S. E., Shadbolt, N. R., & De Roure, D. C. (2004). Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22(1), 54–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazzani, M. J. (1999). A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13(5–6), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. B., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., & Sen, S. (2007). Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The adaptive web (pp. 291–324). Springer.

  • Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why More Is Less. ECCO

  • Shardanand, U., & Maes, P. (1995). Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth”. Paper presented at the proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems.

  • Tejeda-Lorente, A., Porcel, C., Bernabé-Moreno, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). REFORE: A recommender system for researchers based on bibliometrics. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, R., McNee, S. M., Abel, M., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2004). Enhancing digital libraries with TechLens+. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries.

  • Trewin, S. (2000). Knowledge-based recommender systems. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 69(Supplement 32), 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P. (2014). The citation: From culture to infrastructure. In Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (pp. 47).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank our colleagues for their valuable support and assistance. This research is supported by UM Research Grant No. RP028B-14AET.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mahbub Alam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, M.M., Ismail, M.A. RTRS: a recommender system for academic researchers. Scientometrics 113, 1325–1348 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2548-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2548-y

Keywords

Navigation