Skip to main content
Log in

Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: A tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twenty-first century

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proceeding from Moravcsik’s paradigmatic ideas of how to build indigenous capability and sustainable science systems in developing countries, we attempted to further focus on the peculiarities of the twenty-first century and the new challenges of globalisation. In doing so, we selected three particular topics deemed relevant in this context: increase of international visibility and reception by the international community, international collaboration and the participation in research in emerging fields. We analysed these issues using the example of 16 developing countries and emerging economies. We found that several countries achieve an impressive citation impact with a considerable share of highly cited papers. The high impact proved to be associated with international collaboration. We also found two extreme situations in international collaboration, both of which might form challenges in building sustainable national science systems and research structures. Research activity in emerging research topics, finally, showed the presence of developing countries in highly topical research and their capability to contribute also to newest research trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. JASIST, 62(1), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andries, P., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., du Plessis, M., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2013). Chapter 3. Specialization profiles and diagnostic tools. In: Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation, OECD Report. Accessible via: https://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/smart-specialisation.pdf.

  • Anduckia, J. C., Gomez, J., & Gomez, Y. J. (2000). Bibliometric output from Colombian researchers with approved projects by COLCIENCIAS between 1983 and 1994. Scientometrics, 48(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present and prospective. Scientometrics, 52, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouabid, H., Paul-Hus, A., & Lariviere, V. (2016). Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries. Scientometrics, 106(3), 873–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2), 147–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daraio, C., & Glänzel, W. (2016). Grand challenges in data integration-state of the art and future perspectives: an Introduction. Scientometrics, 108(1), 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, D., Sipido, K., & Glänzel, W. (2017). Mapping cross-border collaboration and communication in cardiovascular research from 1992 to 2012. European Heart Journal, 38(16), 1249–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., & Small, E. (1991). Michael J. Moravcsik: Multidimensional scholar and hero of third world science. Scientometrics, 20(1), 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2008). Turkey on the way to the European Union? On a scientific power rising next door. ISSI Newsletter, 4(1), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2011). The application of Characteristic Scores and Scales to the evaluation and ranking of scientific journals. Journal of Information Science, 37(1), 40–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008a). ‘Triad’ or ‘Tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). Characteristic Scores and Scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2008b). A new generation of relational charts for comparative assessment of citation impact. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56(6), 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011a). Research in emerging fields: Who takes the lead? ISSI Newsletter, 7(4), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011b). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using ‘core documents’ for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics, 91(2), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2014). The application of citation-based performance classes to the disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment in national comparison and institutional research assessment. Scientometrics, 101(2), 939–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzman, M. V., Sanz, E., & Sotolongo, G. (1998). Bibliometric study on vaccines (1990–1995) Part I: Scientific production in Iberian-American countries. Scientometrics, 43(2), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles. Scientometrics, 67(1), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias-Chapula, C. A., Sotolongo-Aguilar, G. R., Magde, B., et al. (1999). Subject content analysis of AIDS literature, as produced in Latin America and the Caribbean. Scientometrics, 46(3), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, H. (1995). The reform of R&D system in Estonia, Eesti Teadusfond, pp. 108.

  • Moravcsik, M. J. (1981). Mobilizing science and technology for increasing the indigenous capability in developing-countries. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 1(4), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J. (1985). Applied scientometrics: An assessment methodology for developing countries. Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J. (1988). The coverage of science in the Third World: The “Philadelphia program”. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 147–155). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagtegaal, L. W., & De Bruin, R. E. (1994). The French connection and other neo-colonial patterns in the global network of science. Research Evaluation, 4(2), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2005). Attention Europe: The BRICs are coming! Internationale Politik, 60(5), 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Requena, J. (2005). Dynamics of the modern Venezuelan research community profile. Scientometrics, 65(1), 95–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2008). Triad or Tetrad: Another representation. ISSI Newsletter, 4(1), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. A., van Hooydonk, G., Morales, R. G. T., et al. (2005). Cuban scientific articles in ISI citation indexes and CubaCiencias databases (1988–2003). Scientometrics, 65(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlemmer, B., Glänzel, W. (2008). R&D Profiles of Cuba and other countries of the Caribbean in the 1990’s and the New Millennium. Info 2008—Knowledge Society: New Spaces to Build It, Havana (Cuba), pp. 21–25 April 2008. ISBN: 959-234-040-4.

  • Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1992). Three scientometric etudes on developing countries as a tribute to Michael Moravcsik. Scientometrics, 23(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torricella-Morales, R. G., van Hooydonk, G., & Araujo-Ruiz, J. A. (2000). Citation analysis of Cuban research. Part 1. A case study: The Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science. Scientometrics, 47(2), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, A. (2006). Science and technology policy in Turkey. National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983–2003 period and beyond. Scientometrics, 66(3), 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, J., Xavier, E. C., & Bezerra, F. (2009). Scientific production in Computer Science: A comparative study of Brazil and other countries. Scientometrics, 81(2), 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurtsever, E., & Gulgoz, S. (1999). The increase in the rate of publications originating from Turkey. Scientometrics, 46(2), 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanotto, E. D. (2002). Scientific and technological development in Brazil. The widening gap. Scientometrics, 55(3), 411–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Theves J., Laurens, P., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E., Filliatreau, G. (2006). Assessing international visibility of nations in science: Citations performances of large emerging actors (BRIC). Poster presented at the 9th science and technology indicators Conference in Leuven, Belgium, 7–9 September 2006.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Lin Zhang acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 71573085, the Innovation talents of science and technology in HeNan Province (16HASTIT038; 2015GGJS-108).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Glänzel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glänzel, W., Zhang, L. Scientometric research assessment in the developing world: A tribute to Michael J. Moravcsik from the perspective of the twenty-first century. Scientometrics 115, 1517–1532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2647-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2647-4

Keywords

Navigation