Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of electronic theses and dissertations: a study of the institutional repository of a university in South Africa

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the academic and societal impacts of the engineering electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) at the North-West University. The citation counts obtained through Google Scholar (GS) and the altmetrics data obtained from Dspace on the North-West University institutional repository are used to determine these impacts. Further, the conversion rates of ETDs from an educational output into an academic research output are determined using data from GS and the North-West University institutional repository. The results show that the 612 theses and dissertations attracted 931 citations which translates to 1.52 citations per thesis on average. A total of 41.2% theses and dissertations received at least one citation and the conversion rate into academic research output was 16.8%. The conversion rates in the last 3 years that are part of this research is 27.3% which suggests an improvement. An average of 323 PDF views were received per thesis. The citation and PDF views data show that the Engineering ETDs have commendable academic and societal impacts. Nonetheless, the academic impacts show scant correlation with the societal impacts although some positive trends are noticeable when looking at the origin of PDF views and citations by country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrizah, A., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Can the impact of Non-Western Academic Books be measured? An investigation of Google Books and Google Scholar for Malaysia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2498–2508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2011). Comparing Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar from an environmental sciences perspective. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(1), 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A., Alreyaee, S., & Rahman, A. (2014). Theses and dissertations in institutional repositories: An Asian perspective. New Library World, 115(9/10), 438–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Busaidi, I. S., & Alamri, Y. (2016). Publication rates and characteristics of undergraduate medical theses in New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal, 129(1442), 1175–8716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (2015). The use of altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 46(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. A., & Chiware, E. R. T. (2015). Citation analysis of masters’ theses and doctoral dissertations: Balancing library collections with students’ research information needs. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 613–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., & Flannagan, D. (2016). Measuring the impact of digitized theses: A case study from the London School of Economics. Insights, 29(2), 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonato, S. (2016). Google Scholar and Scopus for finding gray literature publications. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(3), 252–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(2014), 895–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, M. A. (2013). Demystifying the institutional repository for success. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (2016). Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research. Information Processing and Management, 52(2016), 658–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilimo, W. (2015). Green open access in Kenya: A review of the content, policies and usage of institutional repositories. Mousaion, 33(2), 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarivate Analytics. (2017). It’s time to get the facts. http://images.info.science.thomsonreuters.biz/Web/ThomsonReutersScience/%7B6f794b61-1d4d-498f-ac25-f7ba4ca08fff%7D_Web_of_Science_Fact_Book.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Cybermetrics Lab. (2017a). Ranking Web of Repositories: Africa. http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/ranking_africa. Accessed May 19, 2017.

  • Cybermetrics Lab. (2017b). Ranking Web of Repositories: World http://repositories.webometrics.info/en/search/Rankings/boloka. Accessed August 29, 2017.

  • Debbiche, A. C., Mrabet, A., Abidi, E., & Dziri, C. (2016). Impact of the thesis of pathology supported at the faculty of medicine of Tunisis (2000–2010). The Tunisian Medical Society, 94(03), 172–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezema, I. J., & Onyancha, O. B. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of health and medical journals: Issues in medical scholarly communication in Africa. Serials Review, 42(2), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezema, I. J., & Ugwu, C. I. (2013). Electronic theses and dissertations in Nigeria university libraries: Status, challenges and strategies. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers’. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasae, J. K. (2012). Citation analysis of dissertations and theses submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/741/. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Merlo-Vega, J. A. (2015). Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (pp. 419–426). Porto, Portugal, October 07–09, 2015.

  • Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F., Merlo-Vega, J. A., & Martín-Rodero, H. (2016). Providing open access to Ph.D. theses: Visibility and citation benefits. Program, 50(4), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohain, A., & Saika, M. (2014). Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses submitted to the Department of Chemical Sciences, Tezpur University, Assam. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2–14. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2641&context=libphilprac. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science: New Series, 66(1713), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iroaganachi, M. A., Itsekor, V., & Osinulu, I. (2014). Citation analysis of social science research: A case study of Bachelor Degree Research Project reports of a Nigerian University 2009–2013. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 1096. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2807&context=libphilprac. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Jones, A., & Liam, C. (2014). Furthering the research impact of University College Dublin. Dubl + 2n: Dublin Research Repository. http://researchrepository.ucd.ie/bitstream/handle/10197/7292/Furthering_Impact_May_2014.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Kayongo, J., & Helm, C. (2012). Relevance of library collections for graduate student research: A citation analysis study of doctoral dissertations at Notre Dame. College & Research Libraries, 73(1), 47–67. http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/issue/archive. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Kohn, K. C., & Gordon, L. (2014). Citation analysis as a tool for collection development and instruction. Collection Management, 39, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviera, V., Zuccala, A., & Archambault, E. (2008). The declining scientific impact of theses: Implications for electronic thesis and dissertation repositories and graduate studies. Scientometrics, 74(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max Planck Society. (2003). Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Munchen. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Meho, L. I. (2007). The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World, 20(1), 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., O’Hanley, J. R., & Okunola, M. (2017). Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317762069_Using_Google_Scholar_Institutional_Level_Data_to_Evaluate_the_Quality_of_University_Research. Accessed August 29, 2017.

  • Mostofa, S. M., Begun, B., & Ul-Islam, M. M. (2015). Impact of institutional repositories (IRS) to improve educational research and scholarly communication with special reference to Bangladesh and India. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 1(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. (2016). The doctorate in SA: Trends, challenges and constraints. SA Ph.D. Regional Conference: Bloemfontein, 26 February 2016. Available at: http://ir.nrf.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10907/603/mouton_doctorate.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed August 30, 2017.

  • National Research Foundation. (2015). Statement on Open Access to Research Publications from the National Research Foundation (NRF)-Funded Research. Pretoria: NRF. http://www.nrf.ac.za/media-room/news/statement-open-access-research-publications-national-research-foundation-nrf-funded. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • National Research Foundation. (2017). National ETD Portal: South African theses and dissertations. Pretoria: NRF. http://www.netd.ac.za/. May 20, 2017.

  • Ngoepe, A., Maluleka, J. R., & Onyancha, O. B. (2014). Research collaboration in the archives and records management field across and beyond universities in Africa: An informetric analysis. Mousaion, 32(3), 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • North-West University. (2008). Institutional strategy for research and innovation. Available at: http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/i-research-support/ResearchLinkdocs/SetswanaPDFs/ResearchandInnovationStrategy.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • North-West University. (2012). Institutional strategy for research, innovation and community engagement 2012–2014. http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/i-research-support/documents/Web_Docs/Strategic%20Plan%20for%20Research%20Innovation%20Community%20Engagement%20May%202012.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Okafor, V. N. (2010). Analysis of research output of academics in science and engineering in Southern Nigerian Universities: An imperative study. South African Journals of Libraries and Information Science, 76(2), 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha, O. B. (2009). A citation analysis of Sub-Saharan African LIS journals using Google Scholar. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 19(2), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha, O. (2017). Altmetrics of South African journals: Implications for scholarly impact of South African research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyancha, O. B., & Ocholla, D. N. (2009). Assessing researchers’ performance in developing countries: Is Google Scholar an alternative? Mousaion, 27(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllon, J. M., Martın-Martın, A., & Lopez-cozar, E. D. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017). Google Scholar and the gray literature: A reply to Bonato’s review. EC3 Working Papers, 27, 11 February 2017. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1702/1702.03991.pdf. Accessed August 28, 2017.

  • Ortega, J. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(2015), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (pp. 263–287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, A. A. M., Costas, R., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wouters, P. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju, R., Raju, J., & Claassen, J. (2015). Open scholarship practices reshaping South Africa’s scholarly publishing roadmap. Publications, 3(4), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratanya, F. C. (2017). Institutional repository: Access and use by academic staff at Egerton University, Kenya. Library Management, 38(4/5), 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehemtula, S., De Lurdes Rosa, M., Leitao, P., & Aviles, R. A. (2014). Altmetrics in institutional repositories: new perspectives for assessing research impact. In 13th International conference libraries in the digital age (LIDA 2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305499237_Altmetrics_in_Institutional_Repositories_New_Perspectives_for_Assessing_Research_Impact. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. (Eds.). (2015). Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics and research impact. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Z. (2015). Citation analysis of M.A. theses and Ph.D. dissertations in sociology and anthropology: An assessment of library resource usage. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41, 680–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey, D. J. (2011). Statistics for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Foundation Ireland. (2013). Research Impact. Dublin: SFI. http://www.sfi.ie/assets/files/downloads/Funding/Impact/SFI_Research_Impact_2013.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • Sooryamoorthy, P. (2010). The visibility of engineering research in South Africa, 1975–2005. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Africa. (2012). National Development Plan: Vision 2030. National Planning Commission, The Presidency, Pretoria. http://www.dac.gov.za/sites/default/files/NDP%202030%20-%20Our%20future%20-%20make%20it%20work_0.pdf. Accessed August 30, 2017.

  • Tattersall, A. (Ed.). (2016). Altmetrics: a practical guide for librarians, researchers and academics. London: Facet Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2016). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1962–1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (2007). Evaluating the impact of an institutional repository, or positioning innovation between a rock and a hard place. New Review of Information Networking, 13(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters. (2008). White Paper using bibliometrics: a guide to evaluating research performance with citation data. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.

  • Tsunoda, H., Nishizawa, M., Sun, Y., & Liu, X. (2016). A study on the academic and research impact of shared contents in institutional repositories in related to performance indicators of university rankings. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Berge, P. J. (1994). Fischer–Tropsch studies in the slurry phase favouring wax production. Ph.D. thesis. Potchefstroom: NWU. https://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/1597. Accessed September 01, 2017.

  • Van Wyk, B., & Mostert, J. (2014). African institutional repositories as contributors to global information: A South African case study. Mousaion, 32(1), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, R. (2006). Google Scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(1), 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. (Ed.). (2016). A dictionary of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. P., & Van Fleet, C. (2012). Knowledge into action: Research evaluation in library and information science. California: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolhuter, C.C. (2015). The scholarly impact of doctoral research conducted in the field of education in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 1–13. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/saje/v35n3/13.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017.

  • World Bank and Elsevier. (2014). A decade of development in Sub-Saharan African science, technology, engineering & mathematics research. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/237371468204551128/pdf/910160WP0P126900disclose09026020140.pdf. Accessed August 29, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. North-West University, Mafikeng, South Africa

    Siviwe Bangani

Authors
  1. Siviwe Bangani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siviwe Bangani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bangani, S. The impact of electronic theses and dissertations: a study of the institutional repository of a university in South Africa. Scientometrics 115, 131–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2657-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2657-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation