Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The declining scientific wealth of Hong Kong and Singapore

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At a time when the knowledge race is at its most intense, the scientific wealth of nations is increasingly relevant to ensure the preparedness and competitiveness of societies in a globalised, increasingly uncertain and integrated global knowledge economy. Scientific wealth also helps nations become resilient in the face of ever-growing knowledge and technological shifts. Hong Kong and Singapore, which are multicultural, internationalised and capitalist territories, have been part of globalisation since its beginning, and they are renowned for their vibrant research communities. However, given that East Asia and Southeast Asia are becoming worldwide centres of research power and are facing increasing regional competitiveness, a persistent question is whether the two territories are keeping up with the competition and are key players in the global knowledge race. Analysis of their knowledge creation and worldwide impact over the past 20 years indicates that these two territories are struggling to keep up and are showing declining competitiveness. This loss of competitiveness, including in major thematic areas such as Decision Sciences and Business where they had substantial leads in the past, is making these territories indistinguishable from others as knowledge centres, and they are thus potentially less visible and less appealing to potential knowledge related investors. As they continue to be highly internationalised, the main reason behind these trends seems to be related to critical underinvestment in their research systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Calculation made by the author based on the Scimago dataset used in the analysis of this article.

  2. See https://www.ugc.edu.hk/doc/eng/ugc/publication/report/report20180606/interim.pdf [accessed on 29th June 2018].

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2011). Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriaanse, L. S., & Rensleigh, C. (2013). Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Cioni, M., & Pisani, C. (2014). Crossing the hurdle: The determinants of individual scientific performance. Scientometrics, 101(3), 2035–2062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrot, J. S. (2017). Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics. Scientometrics, 110(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavacini, A. (2016). Recent trends in Middle Eastern scientific production. Scientometrics, 109(1), 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2000). National systems of innovation: Institutional linkages and performances in the case of Korea and Taiwan. Scientometrics, 48(3), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimini, G., Gabrielli, A., & Labini, F. S. (2014) The scientific competitiveness of nations. PLoS ONE, 9(12): article number 0113470.

  • Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Komunjer, L. (2012). What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo’s ideas. Review of Economic Studies, 79(2), 581–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K., & Hauk, W. R., Jr. (2017). RCA indices, multinational production and the Ricardian trade model. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Mok, K.-H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of world-class university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfanmanesh, M., Jahromi, R. B., Hosseini, E., & Gholamhosseinzadeh, Z. (2013). Scientific productivity, impact and collaboration of the top Asian countries in Scopus during 1996–2010. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Comparative Research Methods. In J. Matthes, R. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–22). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (2017). Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for? Journal of International Economics, 106, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M. (2014). Worldwide knowledge? Global firms, local labour and the region. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z.-L., Geng, X.-S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitor, M., & Bravo, M. (2010). Portugal at the crossroads of change, facing the shock of the new: People, knowledge and ideas fostering the social fabric to facilitate the concentration of knowledge integrated communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 218–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitor, M. V., Horta, H., & Mendonça, J. (2014). Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta, H., & Veloso, F. (2007). Opening the box: Comparing EU and US scientific output byscientific field. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1334–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations: What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430, 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratke, S. (2011). The creative capital of cities: Interactive knowledge creation and urbanization economies of innovation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, B. S. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing offered in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59(1), 55–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiek, M. (2015). The internationalization of research in Europe: A quantitative study of 11 national systems from a micro-perspective. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(4), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. T. (2015). Soft power and cultural diplomacy: Emerging education hubs in Asia. Comparative Education, 51(3), 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., & Ducruet, C. (2009). Spatial glocalization in Asia-Pacific hub port cities: A comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Urban Geography, 30(2), 162–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.-C., Lee, Y.-Y., & Liaw, Y.-C. (2012). Bibliometric analysis for development of research strategies in agricultural technology: The case of Taiwan. Scientometrics, 93(3), 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.-C., Lin, P.-H., Chuang, Y.-W., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2011). Research output and economic productivity: A Granger causality test. Scientometrics, 89, 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, W. Y. W. (2018). After globalization: A reconceptualization of transnational higher education governance in Singapore and Hong Kong. Higher Education Quarterly, 72(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275, 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, S., Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). The impact of the socio-economic crisis of 2001 on the scientific system of Argentina from the scientometric perspective. Scientometrics, 85(2), 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1997/1, OECD Publishing, Paris.

  • Park, J. (2017). Higher education knowledge production in postcolonial-neoliberal Asia. In J. Jung, H. Horta, & A. Yonezawa (Eds.), Researching higher education in Asia: History, development and future (pp. 51–72). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patelli, A., Cimini, G., Pugliese, E., & Gabrielli, A. (2017). The scientific influence of nations on global scientific and technological development. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1229–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, M., & Bharati, K. A. (2014). Botanical survey of India (1971–2010): A scientometric analysis. Current Science, 106(7), 964–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, T. S. (2002). International dimension of research in Portugal: The European research area and beyond. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione, G. A. (2013). Anchoring globalization in Hong Kong’s research universities: Network agents, institutional arrangements, and brain circulation. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching-up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1897–1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. P. (1998). Knowledge diplomacy—Global competition and the politics of intellectual property. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilirò, D. (2010). Investing in knowledge: Knowledge, human capital and institutions for the long run growth. In M. J. Arentsen, W. van Rossum, & A. E. Seenge (Eds.), Governance in innovation: Firms, clusters and institutions in a changing setting (pp. 33–50). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., & Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Ratchatahirun, P., Yochai, W., Ittiritmeechai, S., Premkamolnetr, N., et al. (2011). Research productivity and impact of ASEAN countries and universities in the field of energy and fuel. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2016). The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Scientometrics, 106(1), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Wang, X. (2017). Who sets up the bridge? Tracking scientific collaborations between China and the European Union. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2015). Reassessing China’s higher education development: A focus on academic culture. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2017). Foil to the West? Interrogating perspectives for observing East Asian higher education. In J. Jung, H. Horta, & A. Yonezawa (Eds.), Researching higher education in Asia: History, development and future (pp. 37–50). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar, T., Metaxiotis, K., & Carrillo, F. J. (Eds.). (2012). Building prosperous knowledge cities: Policies, plans and metrics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Policy, Administration and Social Sciences Education, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Runme Shaw Building, Room 419, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Hugo Horta

Authors
  1. Hugo Horta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Horta.

Additional information

Research developed while on sabbatical leave at the Center for Global Higher Education, Institute of Education, University College London, UK, and at the Graduate School of Asia Pacific Studies, Waseda University, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horta, H. The declining scientific wealth of Hong Kong and Singapore. Scientometrics 117, 427–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2845-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2845-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation