Skip to main content
Log in

Electromobility research in Germany and China: structural differences

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electromobility (e-mobility) is applicable to issues from sustainable transportation to revolutionary driving behaviour. The wide-ranging influence of this concept calls for a shift toward an internationalization of e-mobility research in developed and developing countries alike. Germany and China, as the major exporters and volume producers in the automotive industry, have established the goal of becoming market leaders in e-mobility by 2020. Compared to China, Germany, as a forerunner in the field of e-mobility, is unexpectedly lagging behind in both the sale volume of electric vehicles (EVs) and the share of international publications. Since 2006, China has been the second largest single “producer” of EV-related published research, trailing only the United States. However, the technological capabilities—applying science to real-world issues—seem to be under-represented in these publications. This paper explores structural differences in e-mobility research landscapes and examines possible contextual explanations for the differences between Germany and China. The study involves a detailed comparison of articles sourced from the two countries, beginning with a broad overview of recent research and ending with a short content analysis of the statement concerning current progress and practical challenges for e-mobility development in Germany and China. The conclusion reached is that both countries have explored topics related to EV modes, batteries, energy management and the smart grid; however, specific terms of interest have evolved differently in the two countries. Compared with China, Germany has not achieved a rapid increase in the number of international publications but has still accumulated a vast reservoir of scientific talents and technological resources through the scientific collaboration between academia and industry. Universities, as the main loci of scientific research in China, have actively engaged in international cooperation, addressing problems with no apparent differences from those addressed in Germany. The authors’ views relative to the development of e-mobility in the two countries vary greatly from group to group, indicating that differences should be considered in both the pattern of knowledge production and the research context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (2016-XZ-03-05).

  2. Term by first year is limited by the time span of the dataset (2006–2015), which means that the keywords extracted in each year are relatively new within this interval but could appear before 2006.

  3. VOSviewer reduces the set of key terms or institutions shown in maps by removing the items in the network that are not connected to each other.

References

  • Adam, M. (2016). Accelerating E-mobility in Germany: A case for regulation (pp. 1–11). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichele, C., & Doleski, O. D. (Eds.). (2014). Smart Market: Vom Smart Grid zum intelligenten Energiemarkt. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, A., Campatelli, G., Barbieri, R., & Persi, S. (2015). Solutions and business models for wireless charging of electric vehicles. In Electric vehicle business models (pp. 109–125). Cham: Springer.

  • Barton, B., & Schütte, P. (2017). Electric vehicle law and policy: A comparative analysis. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 35(2), 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder, H., Hannan, C. A., & Lujan, O. (2017). International experience in the academic field: Knowledge production, symbolic capital, and mobility fetishism. Population, Space and Place, 23(6), e2040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biurrun, R., Krieg, D., & Stolten, D. (2012). Systemic tradeoff analysis of fuel cell mobility systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(17), 12639–12649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boßmann, T., & Staffell, I. (2015). The shape of future electricity demand: Exploring load curves in 2050s Germany and Britain. Energy, 90, 1317–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesregierung. (2011). Regierungsprogramm Elektromobilität. Berlin: BMWi, BMVBS, BMW, BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology (pp. 19–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Capgemini. (2012). Managing the change to E-mobility. Retrieved from: http://www.capgemini.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/Managing_the_Change_to_E-Mobility___Capgemini_. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.

  • Chan, C. C. (2013). The rise & fall of electric vehicles in 1828–1930: Lessons learned [scanning our past]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(1), 206–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. W., Huang, M. H., & Lin, C. W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071–2087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Automotive Technology & Research Center (CATARC). (2016). Annual report on energy-saving and new energy vehicle in China (2016). Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese State Council. (2012). Energy-saving and new energy vehicles industry development planning (2012–2020). Retrieved from: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-07/09/content_2179032.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Chlond, B., Weiss, C., Heilig, M., & Vortisch, P. (2014). Hybrid modeling approach of car uses in Germany on basis of empirical data with different granularities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2412, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 855–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., Kahn, M. E., & Locke, S. L. (2017). The private and social consequences of purchasing an electric vehicle and solar panels: Evidence from California. Research in Economics, 71(2), 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. (2009). The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: Evidence from US states. Energy Policy, 37(3), 972–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. A. (1995). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. http://dare.uva.nl/search?metis.record.id=115517.

  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). (2015). China Strategy 2015–2020. Retrieved from: https://www.bmbf.de/pub/China_Strategy_Kurzfassung_eng.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Fernandes Serra, J. V. (2011). Electric vehicles: technology, policy and commercial development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figenbaum, E., & Kolbenstvedt, M. (2013). Electromobility in Norway-experiences and opportunities with electric vehicles (no. 1281/2013).

  • German National Platform for Electric Mobility (NPE). (2010). Retrieved from: www.nationale-plattform-elektromobilitaet.de/. Accessed 13 Jan 2018.

  • Germany—The World’s Automotive Hub of Innovation, Germany Trade & Invest, Ernst & Young European Automotive Survey 2013, retrieved July 6, 2017.

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gläser, Jochen. (2016). German universities on their way to performance-based management of research portfolios. Sociologia Italiana, 8, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldberg, K. (2017). Enhancing the impact of research and knowledge co-production in higher education through communities of practice. In J. McDonald & A. Cater-Steel (Eds.), Communities of practice. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, H. O., Kannegiesser, M., & Autenrieb, N. (2015). The role of electric vehicles for supply chain sustainability in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, W., Zhang, G., Xiao, J., Benard, P., & Chahine, R. (2014). Demonstrations and marketing strategies of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(25), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, H., Liu, Z., Zhao, F., Li, W., & Hang, W. (2015). Scenario analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from China’s passenger vehicles. Energy, 91, 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., Anghel, A. T., Huijsmans, J., & Vuille, F. (2009). A quasi-Delphi study on technological barriers to the uptake of hydrogen as a fuel for transport applications: Production, storage and fuel cell drivetrain considerations. Journal of Power Sources, 193(1), 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N., & Özdemir, E. D. (2011). Impact of different utilization scenarios of electric vehicles on the German grid in 2030. Journal of Power Sources, 196(4), 2311–2318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, K., Ravn, H., Juul, N., & Meibom, P. (2012). Effects of electric vehicles on power systems in Northern Europe. Energy, 48(1), 356–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, H., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2014). Including road transport in the EU ETS (European Emissions Trading System): A model-based analysis of the German electricity and transport sector. Energy, 69, 708–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornbostel, S., Simon, D., & Heise, S. (eds.). 2008. Exzellente Wissenschaft. Das Problem, der Diskurs, das Programm und die Folgen. iFQ-working paper no.4. Bonn. http://www.forschungsinfo.de/publikationen/Download/working_paper_4_2008.pdf. Accessed November 21, 2017.

  • Hu, X., Chang, S., Li, J., & Qin, Y. (2010). Energy for sustainable road transportation in China: Challenges, initiatives and policy implications. Energy, 35(11), 4289–4301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEKE. (2016). Evaluation der Exzellenzinitiative. Endbericht. Berlin: Internationale Expertenkommission zur Evaluation der Exzellenzinitiative/Institut für Innovation und Technik. http://www.gwk-bonn.de/fileadmin/Papers/Imboden-Bericht-2016.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2017.

  • Jansen, D. (2017). Networks, social capital, and knowledge production. In B. Hollstein, W. Matiaske, & K. U. Schnapp (Eds.), Networked governance. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Y., Gao, Y., Xu, Z., Wong, K. P., Lai, L. L., Xue, Y., et al. (2015). Powering China’s sustainable development with renewable energies: Current status and future trend. Electric Power Components and Systems, 43(8–10), 1193–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juul, N., & Meibom, P. (2012). Road transport and power system scenarios for Northern Europe in 2030. Applied Energy, 92, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagermann, H. (2017). Why E-mobility is failing in Germany. Retrieved July 5, 2017, from an interview with Handelsblatt Global: https://global.handelsblatt.com/companies-markets/why-e-mobility-is-failing-in-germany-790818.

  • Kaltenbrunner, W. (2017). Situated knowledge production, international impact: Changing publishing practices in a german engineering department. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9337-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N. A., & Girdwood, R. (2012). Evaluation of a thermally-driven metal-hydride-based hydrogen compressor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(14), 10898–10916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kölbl, R., Bauer, D., & Rudloff, C. (2013). Travel behavior and electric mobility in Germany: Is the problem the driving range, costs, or both? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2385, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, D. Y., & Bi, X. H. (2014). Impact of social network and business model on innovation diffusion of electric vehicles in China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/230765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koseoglu, M. A. (2016). Mapping the institutional collaboration network of strategic management research: 1980–2014. Scientometrics, 109(1), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1894-5.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kühne, R. (2010). Electric buses: An energy efficient urban transportation means. Energy, 35(12), 4510–4513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, S. (2008). New Public Management und die Governance der Universitäten. der moderne staat – dms: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 1(1), 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho, W. et al. (2015). Fostering sustainable mobility in Europe: The contributions of the project “E-mobility North Sea region”. In E-mobility in Europe (pp. 3–25). Cham: Springer.

  • Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., & Ouyang, M. (2011). The pricing of charging for electric vehicles in China: Dilemma and solution. Energy, 36(9), 5765–5778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesenkotter, B., & Schewe, G. (2014). E-mobility: Zum sailing-ship-effect in der automobilindustrie. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Chen, J. (2015). The impact of the Chinese automotive industry: Scenarios based on the national environmental goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazenod, A. (2018). Lost in translation? Comparative education research and the production of academic knowledge. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(2), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meibom, P., & Karlsson, K. (2010). Role of hydrogen in future North European power system in 2060. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(5), 1853–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Le, U. V. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietzcker, R. C., Longden, T., Chen, W., Fu, S., Kriegler, E., Kyle, P., et al. (2014). Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy, 64, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Projects and programmes on environment and climate change. Retrieved August 21, 2017, from GIZ: https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/377.html.

  • Qu, Z., Zhang, S., & Zhang, C. (2017). Patent research in the field of library and information science: Less useful or difficult to explore? Scientometrics, 111(1), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranga, L., Debackere, K., & Tunzelmann, N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh, S. N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: A co-word analysis of the journal scientometrics (2005–2010). Scientometrics, 102(1), 929–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resch, M., Bühler, J., Klausen, M., & Sumper, A. (2017). Impact of operation strategies of large scale battery systems on distribution grid planning in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1042–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanden, B. (2013). Systems perspectives on electromobility 2013, Chalmers University of Technology. ISBN 978-91-980973-1-3.

  • Santini, D. J. (2011). Electric vehicle waves of history: Lessons learned about market deployment of electric vehicles. In Electric vehicles-The benefits and barriers. InTech.

  • Saxena, S., Phadke, A., & Gopal, A. (2014). Understanding the fuel savings potential from deploying hybrid cars in China. Applied Energy, 113, 1127–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of informetrics). Library Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellmair, R., & Hamacher, T. (2014). Optimization of charging infrastructure for electric taxis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416, 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, T., Chen, Y., & Shi, Y. (2015). Orchestrating ecosystem co-opetition: Case studies on the business models of the EV demonstration programme in China. In Electric vehicle business models (pp. 215–227). Cham: Springer.

  • Shore, Cris. (2008). Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagscherer, U., & Frietsch, R. (2014). E-mobility in China: Chance or daydream? (No. 40). Fraunhofer ISI discussion papers innovation systems and policy analysis.

  • Tamor, M. A., Moraal, P. E., Reprogle, B., & Milačić, M. (2015). Rapid estimation of electric vehicle acceptance using a general description of driving patterns. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 51, 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 185–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S., Ulli-Beer, S., & Wokaun, A. (2012). Assessing customer preferences for hydrogen-powered street sweepers: A choice experiment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(16), 12003–12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Wu, Y., Ke, W., Zhang, S., Zhou, B., & Hao, J. (2015). Can propulsion and fuel diversity for the bus fleet achieve the win–win strategy of energy conservation and environmental protection? Applied Energy, 147, 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Zamel, N., Jiao, K., Zhou, Y., Yu, S., Du, Q., et al. (2013). Life cycle analysis of internal combustion engine, electric and fuel cell vehicles for China. Energy, 59, 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Li, K., Jiang, Y., Lv, Q., Shang, L., & Sun, Y. (2011). Large-scale battery system development and user-specific driving behavior analysis for emerging electric-drive vehicles. Energies, 4(5), 758–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Ma, Q., & Li, C. (2015). Performance investigation and analysis of market-oriented low-speed electric vehicles in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Li, J., Ouyang, M., Hua, J., & Yang, G. (2014). Multi-mode control strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles regarding fuel economy and durability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(5), 2374–2389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., & Lin, B. (2015). Factors affecting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China’s transport sector: A dynamic nonparametric additive regression model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Mueller, C. D., Li, J., Ouyang, M., & Hu, Z. (2015). Multi-objective component sizing based on optimal energy management strategy of fuel cell electric vehicles. Applied Energy, 157, 664–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X., Li, J., & Liu, L. (2015). Solving spent lithium-ion battery problems in China: Opportunities and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1759–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bai, X. (2017). Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Huo, H., Guan, D., Klimont, Z., et al. (2015). How will greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles be constrained in China around 2030? Applied Energy, 156, 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., Qian, K., Allan, M., & Zhou, W. (2011). Modeling of the cost of EV battery wear due to V2G application in power systems. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 26(4), 1041–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank for financial supports provided by the China Scholarship Council (No. 201506060153), the National Science Foundation of China (No. 71673036) and the Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (2016-XZ-03-05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qu Zhao.

Appendix

Appendix

The matched search queries are constructed as follows:

  1. 1.

    NEVs-TS = ((“Electric* Vehicle*” OR “electric* car*” OR “electric* motor car*” OR “electric* motor vehicle*” OR “electric* driven vehicle*” OR “electric* automobile*” OR “electric traveling vehicle*” OR “electric motorcar*” OR “electric powered vehicle*” OR “Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle*” OR “Plug-in Hybrid electric Vehicle*” OR “Hydrogen Fuel Cell vehicle*” OR “Hydrogen Vehicle*” OR “E-mobility” OR “PHEV” OR “Extended-Range Electric Vehicle*” OR “range-extended electric vehicle*”) NOT (“bike*” OR “bicycle*” OR “electrical cardioversion” OR “electric* cardiograms” OR “electric* cardiac” OR “electrically cardio*” OR “electric* cardio*” OR “Electric* carrier” OR “Electric* carotid” OR “Hybrid Vehicle*” OR “Exposure Value*” OR “Hepatitis E virus” OR “Natural gas vehicle*” OR “mobile robot*” OR “i.e., mobility” OR “Urban mobility” OR “Ion mobility” OR “Nanoparticle*” OR “particle*” OR “Hybrid Electric Vehicle*” OR “GI-VR50-pheV” OR “Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus” OR “Porcine haemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus” OR “tRNA” OR “pheV tRNA” OR “pheV tRNA locus” OR “pheV locus” OR “shRNA” OR “DENGUE VIRUS” OR “gene” OR “pHEV-4TW” OR “Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli” OR “genomic island”));

  2. 2.

    ESVs-TS = ((“Hybrid Vehicle*” OR “Hybrid car*” OR “Hybrid Electric Vehicle*” OR “Hybrid Electric* Car” OR “Hybrid Electric* Cars” OR “Alternative fuel vehicle*” OR “Alternative fuel Car*” OR “Gas vehicle*” OR “HEV” OR “HEVs” OR “Compressed natural gas vehicle” OR “Liquefied natural gas vehicle”) NOT (“Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle*” OR “off-vehicle chargeable hybrid electric vehicle*” OR “PHEV*” OR “Hepatitis E*” OR “hepatitis E virus *” OR “latex allergy*” OR “Hendra virus” OR “Enterovirus” OR “carrageenan” OR “High endothelial venules”)).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Q. Electromobility research in Germany and China: structural differences. Scientometrics 117, 473–493 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2873-9

Keywords

Navigation