Abstract
With the flourish of scientific literature, the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is increasingly adopted in academia to uniquely identify research articles. By using Web of Science’s DOI search, we find that millions of DOI names appear to begin with an alphabetic character which violates the naming rule of DOI. In this study, we try to uncover the secrets behind Web of Science’s DOI search and explain this mysterious phenomenon. A similar investigation is also conducted by using the Scopus database. A few suggestions are provided at the end of this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
The field tag “DO” stands for “DOI” and is designed to search in the DOI name field in Web of Science.
All records in Web of Science have an accession number which can be used to uniquely identify a specific record in Web of Science.
UT is the field tag designed for Web of Science to search in the accession number field.
References
Boudry, C., & Chartron, G. (2017). Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1453–1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2225-6.
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2181–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4.
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016a). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003.
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016b). The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.006.
Gorraiz, J., Melero-Fuentes, D., Gumpenberger, C., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. C. (2016). Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.008.
Huang, M., & Liu, W. (2019). Large numbers of easily identifiable illegal DOI names still exist in Scopus. Working paper.
Liu, W. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1089.
Liu, W., Hu, G., & Tang, L. (2018). Missing author address information in Web of Science—An explorative study. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.008.
Tang, L., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2017). Funding acknowledgment analysis: Queries and caveats. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23713.
Zhu, J., Hu, G., & Liu, W. (2019). DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science. Scientometrics, 118(2), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2980-7.
Acknowledgements
This research is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 71801189), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers LQ18G010005 and LQ18G030010) and Program of Humanities and Social Science of Education Ministry of China (Grant number 19YJC630101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, J., Liu, F. & Liu, W. The secrets behind Web of Science’s DOI search. Scientometrics 119, 1745–1753 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03091-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03091-2