Abstract
Survivability is one of the features for success in contemporary science ecosystem. In this paper, we analyze the publication records of physicists in American Physical Society journals, aiming to identify the career length of each researcher and accordingly investigate the dropout phenomenon in science by the example of physicists. We find that scientific career is a complex nonlinear evolution process and can be generally divided into four stages regarding the dropout rate. In the early career, the dropout rate from trainee phase to maturity is high and negatively correlated with the research performance of the scientists, in both productivity and impact. Moreover, a strong nonlinearity is observed when we study the detailed relationship between the dropout rate and research performance. Interestingly, in the more mature stage of the career, the dropout rate becomes stable and independent of the early performance of the scientists. In the late career stage, the dropout rate increases and is mainly determined by retirement and external factors. The findings in this paper may provide useful guidance for young scholars to allocate their research effort in the early career.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afonso, A. (2016). Varieties of academic labor markets in Europe. PS, Political Science and Politics, 49(4), 816–821.
Allen, J., & Robbins, S. B. (2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational interests, academic preparation, and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 62–79.
Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1), e1400005.
Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 377–390.
Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). The PhD factory. Nature, 472, 276–279.
Daniels, L. M., et al. (2011). Relieving career anxiety and indecision: the role of undergraduate students’ perceived control and faculty affiliations. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 409–426.
Deville, P., et al. (2015). Career on the move: Geography, stratification, and scientific impact. Scientific Reports, 4(1), 4770.
Deville, P., Wang, D., Sinatra, R., Song, C., Blondel, V. D., & Barabai, A. L. (2014). Career on the move: Geography, stratification, and scientific impact. Scientific Reports, 4, 4770.
Duch, J., et al. (2012). The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PLoS One, 7(12), e51332.
Editorial (2017). Spread your wings, Nature, 550, 429.
Fortunato, et al. (2018). Science of science. Science 359, eaao0185.
Fraiberger, S. P., et al. (2018). Quantifying reputation and success in art. Science, 362(6416), 825–829.
Kim, B., et al. (2016). Tolerance of uncertainty: Links to happenstance, career decision self-efficacy, and career satisfaction. The Career Development Quarterly, 64(2), 140–152.
Levecque, K., et al. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(04), 868–879.
Liao, C. N., & Ji, C. (2015). The origin of major choice, academic commitment, and career-decision readiness among taiwanese college students. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 156–170.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.
Mills, D., & Paulson, J. (2014). Making social scientists, or not? Glimpses of the unmentionable in doctoral education. Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 73–97.
Milojević, S., Radicchi, F., & Walsh, J. P. (2018). Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., 115(50), 12616–12623.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., et al. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences., 109(41), 16474–16479.
Musch, J., & Grondin, S. (2001). Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: A review of the relative age effect in sport. Developmental Review, 21(2), 147–167.
Petersen, A. M., et al. (2011). Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(1), 18–23.
Petersen, A. M., et al. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(43), 15316–15321.
Petersen, A. M., Riccaboni, M., Stanley, H. E., & Pammolli, F. (2012). Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(14), 5213–5218.
Scott, J., Long, & Paul, D. A. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44(5), 816–830.
Seifert, K. H. (1994). Improving prediction of career adjustment with measures of career development. The Career Development Quarterly., 42(4), 353–366.
Sikora, J. (2018). Aimless or flexible? Does uncertainty in adolescent occupational expectations matter in young adulthood? Australian Journal of Education, 62(2), 154–168.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89.
Sinatra, R., et al. (2016). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), aff5239–aff5239.
Stumpf, H. (1995). Scientific creativity: A short overview. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 225–241.
Weinstein, F. M., Healy, C. C., & Ender, P. B. (2002). Career choice anxiety, coping, and perceived control. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(4), 339–349.
Yoon, S., et al. (2018). Factors influencing career progress for early stage clinician-scientists in emerging Asian academic medical centres: a qualitative study in Singapore. BMJ Open, 8(3), e020398.
Zeng, A., et al. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports, 714–715, 1–73.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. L160008) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61603046).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xing, Y., Zeng, A., Fan, Y. et al. The strong nonlinear effect in academic dropout. Scientometrics 120, 793–805 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03135-7
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03135-7