Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of book citations in social science journals by Central and Eastern European authors

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to assess the role of authored and edited books in scholarly communication through citation analysis. It focuses on social science journal articles written by authors from Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. The sample for book citation analysis were references (n = 1,033,926) from research articles (n = 35,501) published in 2726 journals indexed in Scopus, where at least one author was from a CEE country. The journals were classified in 10 social science fields (economics and business, education, library and information science, law, political science, psychology, sociology, and three multidisciplinary fields) and divided into two groups according to the journal publisher’s country (CEE and non-CEE journals). Authored (n = 221,768) and edited books (n = 74,506) were extracted from cited references through an in-depth parsing and cleaning process. The average number of cited references per article in the full sample was 29, with the share of cited authored books of 21.4% and edited books of 7.2%. The share of authored books in cited references in CEE journals was 26.6%, while for edited books it was 7.8%. Sociology is a field where books are almost equally represented in cited references (47%) as articles, while book citations are much less represented in the fields of psychology (28%), economics and business (27%), and information and library science (24%). Additionally, the core book authors were identified across scientific fields, and differences in citing books covered by Scholarly Publishers Indicators versus books published by local/regional publishers were explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This research was carried out as a part of the project “Research activity, collaboration and orientation in social sciences in Croatia and other post-socialist European countries (RACOSS)”, http://racoss.idi.hr/index_en.html.

  2. Authors’ access to Scopus database was endorsed by Croatian Ministry of Science and Education.

  3. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS), Classification in the Frascati Manual http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf (accessed 24-11-2017).

  4. For more information on Scholarly Publishers Indicators (SPI) see http://ilia.cchs.csic.es/SPI/ (assessed 05-01-2019).

  5. Ulrichsweb™, https://www.proquest.com/products-services/Ulrichsweb.html (accessed 21-01-2019).

  6. The recent Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication: https://www.helsinki-initiative.org/ (accessed 24-06-2019) is in favor of protecting national publishers.

  7. This problem could be solved through the initiative on International Register of Book Publishers that is being developed in the framework of ENRESSH Cost Action and aims at reflecting the diversity in scholarly publishing at the national level (https://enressh.eu/ (accessed 24-06-2019).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the Project IP-09-2014-9351. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Croatian Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maja Jokić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jokić, M., Mervar, A. & Mateljan, S. Comparative analysis of book citations in social science journals by Central and Eastern European authors. Scientometrics 120, 1005–1029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03176-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03176-y

Keywords

Navigation