Skip to main content
Log in

Intertwining globality and locality: bibliometric analysis based on the top geography annual conferences in America and China

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic conferences are key places for knowledge communication, innovation and production. Since the papers from large geography conferences are an important manifestation of the trending topics and frontiers of geographical research, we break through the limitations of traditional conference reviews through implementation of a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of conference papers. This is of great significance for understanding the subject characteristics and communication modes of academic geography. This article argues that: the American Association of Geographers’ Annual Meeting (hereinafter referred to as AAG) and China Conference on Geography (CCG) have both similarities and differences in their characteristics, especially in their focus on specific geographical problems; under the influence of the conference history, academic authority, and institutional culture, AAG and CCG respectively highlight “globality” and “locality” characteristics, and there are partial common concerns and multiple interweavings on global and local research topics. Compared with AAG’s diversified technical applications and sub-discipline development, CCG has neglected humanistic thinking in the empirical bias. With the continuous intersection and integration of different disciplines or areas, the geography of each country in the future should jointly enhance the inclusiveness and openness of academic conferences to promote academic freedom and develop solutions to geographic issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly, D. D., Loarie, S. R., Cornwell, W. K., Weiss, S. B., Hamilton, H., Branciforte, R., et al. (2010). The geography of climate change: Implications for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions,16(3), 476–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfasi, N., & Fenster, T. (2009). Between the “global” and the “local”: On global locality and local globality. Urban Geography,30(5), 543–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Geographers (AAG). (2019). All about the Annual Meeting. Retrieved January 8, 2019. from https://annualmeeting.aag.org/AAGAnnualMeeting/Register_to_Attend/About_the_Annual_Meeting/AAGAnnualMeeting/About_the_Meeting.aspx?hkey=1b30dfec-1fc7-4c37-adc3-39038720159f.

  • Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(12), 2513–2536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. (2012). Scarcity, frontiers and development. Geographical Journal,178(2), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. J. (2004). Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography,28(5), 565–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. J. (2016). American geographers and World War II: Spies, teachers, and occupiers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 543–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. J., & Minca, C. (2013). Nazi spatial theory: The dark geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,103(3), 669–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (2010). The social construction of globality. International Political Sociology,4(3), 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, B., Begue, A., Lo Seen, D., de Almeida, C. A., & Simoes, M. (2017). A remote sensing approach for regional-scale mapping of agricultural land-use systems based on NDVI time series. Remote Sensing,9(6), 600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielecka, E., & Burek, E. (2019). Spatial data quality and uncertainty publication patterns and trends by bibliometric analysis. Open Geosciences,11(1), 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biljecki, F. (2016). A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,30(7), 1302–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1979). The dissenting tradition. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,69(1), 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. S. (2009). Remote sensing in physical geography: A twenty-first-century perspective. Progress in Physical Geography,33(4), 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, A. E., Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Fisher-Reid, M. C., Hua, X., Karanewsky, C. J., Ryu, H., et al. (2013). How does climate change cause extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,280(1750), 20121890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Qualitative scientometrics: Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S. X., Yu, Z. Q., Zhang, J. Z., Feng, F., Xu, D. Y., & Mu, X. M. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services in China. Ecological Engineering,125, 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology,57(3), 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. X., Lu, D. D., Tang, C. C., Liu, C. L., Ye, Y. Y., Ding, J. J., et al. (2018). Inheritance and innovation of human and economic geography: Actions of young scholars. Geographical Research,37(10), 2096–2124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, H. S., Venevsky, S., Wu, C., & Wang, M. H. (2019). NDVI-based vegetation dynamics and its response to climate changes at Amur-Heilongjiang River Basin from 1982 to 2015. Science of the Total Environment,650, 2051–2062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L. (1984). A theory of local-autonomy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,74(2), 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromley, E. K. (2003). GIS and disease. Annual Review of Public Health,24, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2013). The geopolitics of climate change. Political Geography,37, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Hoz-Correa, A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Bakucz, M. (2018). Past themes and future trends in medical tourism research: A co-word analysis. Tourism Management,65, 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, R. (2010). Geographies of identity: Climate change, governmentality and activism. Progress in Human Geography,34(4), 488–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmer, A. (2018). GLOFs in the WOS: Bibliometrics, geographies and global trends of research on glacial lake outburst floods (Web of Science, 1979–2016). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(3), 813–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C. L., Bao, C., Huang, J. C., & Li, G. D. (2018). Contribution, responsibility and mission of geography on China’s urbanization development. Scientia Geographica Sinica,38(3), 321–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, E., & Haffner, M. (2019). Twitter and academic geography through the lens of #AAG2018.  The Professional Geographer,71(4), 751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry,40(1), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks’ conceptual clarification. Social Networks,1(3), 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., & Mori, T. (2004). Frontiers of the new economic geography. Papers in Regional Science,84(3), 377–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Q. Z., Guo, Y. Q., Xu, H. M., Ganjurjav, H., Li, Y., Wan, Y. F., et al. (2016). Climate change and its impacts on vegetation distribution and net primary productivity of the alpine ecosystem in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Science of the Total Environment,554, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. R. (2009). Human geography. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 218–231). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2013). Prospects for a space-time GIS. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,103(5), 1072–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth,3(3), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, C. L., Hu, L. Q., Zhang, X. M., Wang, X. D., & Guo, J. (2011). Climate change and urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta. Habitat International,35(4), 544–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Z. Y., Liu, Y., Zhong, M., Shi, G. Z., Li, Q. B., Zeng, D., et al. (2018). Influencing factors of domestic waste characteristics in rural areas of developing countries. Waste Management,72(2), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C. F., Liu, H. Y., & Li, S. C. (2017). Based on the frontier of geography, serving the national strategic needs: The 65th anniversary of Peking University’s Department of Geography. Acta Geographica Sinica,72(11), 1933–1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. K., & Elwood, S. (2010). Extending the qualitative capabilities of GIS: Computer-aided qualitative GIS. Transactions in GIS,14(1), 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, J. M., Grant, R., & Jianu, R. (2018). Cities on and off the map: A bibliometric assessment of urban globalisation research. Urban Studies,55(12), 2569–2585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy,26(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,7(4), 373–397.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M.-P. (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,92(4), 645–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M.-P., & Schwanen, T. (2018). Context and uncertainty in geography and GIScience: Advances in theory, method, and practice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,108(6), 1473–1475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change,5(11), 1014–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, N., Ali, S., & Crandall, D. (2018). Utilizing remote sensing and big data to quantify conflict intensity: The Arab Spring as a case study. Applied Geography,94, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics,94(2), 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., & Shao, M. (2014). Soil organic carbon and influencing factors in different landscapes in an arid region of northwestern China. CATENA,116, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Ye, Y. P., Song, B. W., Wang, R. S., & Tao, Y. (2014). Assessing the changes in land use and ecosystem services in Changzhou municipality, Peoples’ Republic of China, 1991-2006. Ecological Indicators,42, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. Y., Messina, J. P., Peter, B. G., & Snapp, S. S. (2017). Mapping land suitability for agriculture in Malawi. Land Degradation and Development,28(7), 2001–2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. C., Liu, J. L., Zhang, C. Y., & Zhao, Z. Q. (2011). The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography. Acta Geographica Sinica,66(12), 1618–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F. L., Lin, A. W., Wang, H. H., Peng, Y. L., & Hong, S. (2016). Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,106(2), 751–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. G., Li, S. X., Ouyang, Z. Y., Tam, C., & Chen, X. D. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,105(28), 9477–9482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, H. L. (2003). Land rehabilitation and regional land use transition. Progress in Geography,22(2), 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D. D. (2015). Splendid achievements, greater mission: Write before the 33rd international geographical congress in Beijing. Advances in Earth Science,30(10), 1075–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, G. N., Batty, M., Strobl, J., Lin, H., Zhu, A. X., & Chen, M. (2019). Reflections and speculations on the progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A geographic perspective. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,33(2), 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2018). Epistemic geographies of climate change: Science, space and politics. Progress in Human Geography,42(3), 395–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy,41(6), 955–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Michael, W. (2013). New Localities. Regional Studies,47(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masia, S., Susnik, J., Marras, S., Mereu, S., Spano, D., & Trabucco, A. (2018). Assessment of irrigated agriculture vulnerability under climate change in southern Italy. Water,10(2), 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1991). The political place of locality studies. Environment and Planning A,23(2), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, N. (2017). Cultivating (a) sustainability capital: Urban agriculture, ecogentrification, and the uneven valorization of social reproduction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,108(2), 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, S. K. (2009). Traditions and trends: A review of geographical scholarship in tourism. Tourism Geographies,11(1), 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Xiao, Y., Polasky, S., Liu, J., Xu, W., et al. (2016). Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science,352(6292), 1455–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011). Neoliberal suburbanism: Frontier space. Urban Geography,32(6), 884–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat, Z. A. (2019). Evolution and future trends in global research on cadastre: a bibliometric analysis. GeoJournal,84(4), 1121–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popke, J. (2016). Researching the hybrid geographies of climate change: Reflections from the field. Area,48(1), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty: Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radil, S. M., & Jiao, J. (2016). Public participatory GIS and the geography of inclusion. The Professional Geographer,68(2), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. (2015). Geography and climate change: Presidential Address and record of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) AGM 2015. Geographical Journal,181(3), 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Johnson, R. S., Holben, B. N., Yokelson, R. J., Zhang, J. L., et al. (2013). Observing and understanding the Southeast Asian aerosol system by remote sensing: An initial review and analysis for the Seven Southeast Asian Studies (7SEAS) program. Atmospheric Research,122, 403–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E. (2002). The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography,78(3), 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E. (2015). Thinking geographically: Globalizing capitalism and beyond. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,105(6), 1113–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, E., & Tyner, J. (2016). Forum on geography and militarism: An introduction. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,106(3), 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmool, J. L. C., Johnson, I. L., Dodson, Z. M., Keene, R., Gradeck, R., Beach, S. R., et al. (2018). Developing a GIS-based online survey instrument to elicit perceived neighborhood geographies to address the uncertain geographic context problem. The Professional Geographer,70(3), 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2016). Hydrological problems of water resources in irrigated agriculture: A management perspective. Journal of Hydrology,541, 1430–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G., & Gonzalez, A. J. (2011). Building high-performing human-like tactical agents through observation and experience. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B,41(3), 792–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, A. M. (2012). Interactions between soil, rainfall, and wildlife drive surface water quality across a savanna ecosystem. Ecohydrology,6(1), 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, D. Z. (1998). GIS-based urban modelling: Practices, problems, and prospects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science,12(7), 651–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, F. L., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystems structure and function to climate change in China. Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences,115, G03003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornbush, M. (2015). Geography, urban geomorphology and sustainability. Area,47(4), 350–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornbush, M. (2017). Physical geography and environmental sustainability. Sustainability,9(12), 2195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y. G., Wen, C., & Hong, S. (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics,2(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics,84(2), 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachowiak, M. P., Walters, D. F., Kovacs, J. M., Wachowiak-Smolikova, R., & James, A. L. (2017). Visual analytics and remote sensing imagery to support community-based research for precision agriculture in emerging areas. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,143, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, J. (2010). Climate change, capitalism, and the challenge of transdisciplinarity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,100(4), 983–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. J., He, Q. Q., Liu, X. J., Zhuang, Y. H., & Hong, S. (2012). Global urbanization research from 1991 to 2009: A systematic research review. Landscape and Urban Planning,104(3–4), 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf, B. (2015). Cyberwar: A new frontier for political geography. Political Geography,46, 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wastfelt, A., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Reclaiming localisation for revitalising agriculture: A case study of peri-urban agricultural change in Gothenburg, Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies,47, 172–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, F., Grubesic, T. H., & Bishop, B. W. (2015). Exploring the GIS knowledge domain using CiteSpace. The Professional Geographer,67(3), 374–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Geng, Y., Tian, X., Zhong, S. Z., Wu, W., Yu, S. T., et al. (2018). Responding climate change: A bibliometric review on urban environmental governance. Journal of Cleaner Production,204, 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H. L., Chen, Q. R., Lu, F. C., Wang, W., Yao, G. R., & Yu, J. L. (2019). Spatial-temporal disparities and influencing factors of total-factor green use efficiency of industrial land in China. Journal of Cleaner Production,207, 1047–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C., Chen, M. X., Chen, R. S., & Guo, Z. W. (2014a). Multi-scalar separations: land use and production of space of Xianlin, a university town in Nanjing, China. Habitat International,42, 264–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C., Chen, R. S., & Craig, Y. (2014b). Nian: When Chinese mythology affects air pollution. Lancet,383, 2125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, C., & Ji, R. J. (2019). We are all makers: The method of keyword selection in teaching and learning human geography. The Professional Geographer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1559654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y. H., Ma, D. Y., & Wu, S. H. (2018). Climate change risk to forests in China associated with warming. Scientific Reports,8, 493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C. H., & Kovacs, J. M. (2012). The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture,13(6), 693–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. H., Yang, K., & Cao, Y. B. (2019). GIS-based rapid disaster loss assessment for earthquakes. IEEE Access,7, 6129–6139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. Y., Xiong, Z., Zhang, X. Z., Shi, Y., Liu, J. Y., Shao, Q. Q., et al. (2017). Simulation of the climatic effects of land use/land cover changes in eastern China using multi-model ensembles. Global and Planetary Change,154, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, L., & Ye, C. (2018). Disorder or reorder? The spatial production of State-Level New Areas in China. Sustainability,10(10), 3628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, L., Ye, C., Ma, W., Zhao, B., & Hu, S. L. (2019). Production of space and developmental logic of new urban districts in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(8), 1548–1562.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported jointly by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571138, 41871143).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhuang, L., Ye, C. & Lieske, S.N. Intertwining globality and locality: bibliometric analysis based on the top geography annual conferences in America and China. Scientometrics 122, 1075–1096 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03325-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03325-3

Keywords

Navigation