Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate university is a unique form of educational arrangement to accomplish an organization’s goals by building the intellectual capital of its employees. In the academia, it is a relatively new concept that gained foothold during the 1990s. While it is a fertile area of research with several works unravelling its diverse aspects, only a few studies have delved into building the knowledge blocks of the concept of corporate university. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the major clusters of corporate universities obtained from the extant literature. In this study, 207 pertinent articles were retrieved from Scopus, an online electronic database. Post this, co-citation and citation analysis was performed on the 207 articles and a co-citation matrix was formulated to enlist the clusters of corporate universities. Subsequently, multi-dimensional scaling and cluster analysis techniques were used to extract the essential clusters of corporate university. Finally, five major clusters emerged: (1) corporate university as a source of competitive advantage, (2) corporate university as a layered concept, (3) reimagining corporate university through technology, (4) corporate universities: paradigms and models and (5) corporate university: performance metrics. Results of this study can act as leading insights for future studies and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal,27(7), 621–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (2007). What is a next-generation corporate university? In M. Allen (Ed.), The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities (pp. 3–18). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Gonzalez, A., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Chacon, L. A. P. (2018). Corporate universities as a new paradigm and source of social innovation, sustainability, technology and education in the XXI century. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. A. Gomez, & P. Marquez (Eds.), Strategies and best practices in social innovation (pp. 153–169). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, V. (2009). Desperately seeking alignment: Reflections of senior line managers and HRD executives. Human Resource Development International,12(3), 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Lichtenberger, B. L. (2007). The corporate university landscape in Germany. Journal of Workplace Learning,19(2), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association,91(1), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, G., Cappiello, G., & Pedrini, G. (2013). The corporate university in the European utility industries. Utilities Policy,25, 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnone, M. (1998). Corporate universities: A viewpoint on the challenges and best practices. Career Development International,3(5), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(12), 2513–2536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, K. (2007). Learning as a competitive business variable. In M. Allen (Ed.), The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities (pp. 39–62). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCG. (2013). Corporate universities—An engine for human capital. Retrieved from http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/Corporate_Universities_Jul_2013_tcm9-95435.pdf. Accessed 11 Sep 2018.

  • Blass, E. (2001). What's in a name? A comparative study of the traditional public university and the corporate university. Human Resource Development International, 4(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, E. (2005). The rise and rise of the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training,29(1 SPEC. ISS.), 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2017). Geographies of influence: A citation network analysis of higher education 1972–2014. Scientometrics,110(3), 1579–1599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappiello, G., & Pedrini, G. (2017). The performance evaluation of corporate universities. Tertiary Education and Management,23(3), 304–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton, G., McMillan, C., & Overall, J. (2018). Strategic capacities in US universities—The role of business schools as institutional builders. Problems and Perspectives in Management,16(1), 186–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernykh, S. I., & Parshikov, V. I. (2016). Corporate education in Russia. Professional Education in the Modern World,6(2), 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T., & Hermens, A. (2001). Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning. Education + Training,43, 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, M. S., Merritt, K. L., & Murray, S. R. (2009). Using corporate universities to failitate knowledge transfer and achieve competitive advantage: An exploratory model based on media richness and type of knowledge to be transferred. International Journal of Knowledge Management,5(4), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté, J. E., & Allahar, A. (2011). Lowering higher education: The rise of corporate universities and the fall of liberal education. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocetti, C. (2001). Corporate learning—A knowledge management perspective. Internet and Higher Education,4(3–4), 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A co-citation analysis. MIS Quarterly,11(3), 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2000a). Case research into corporate university developments. Journal of Workplace Learning,12(6), 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2000b). Case research into the evolution of a corporate university development process. Journal of Workplace Learning,12(8), 342–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2001). How to configure the corporate university for success. Journal of Workplace Learning,13(2), 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2002a). Managing the corporate university watershed. Journal of Workplace Learning,14(6), 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2002b). Managing the issue of learning relevance in the formulation of corporate learning strategies. Journal of Workplace Learning,14(5), 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dealtry, R. (2017). The future of corporate universities: How your company can benefit from value and performance-driven organisational development. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, F. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doody, K. J. (2001). Implementing a corporate-university relations program. Research Technology Management,44(5), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, R. (1999). Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. Journal of Knowledge Management,3(1), 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, G. (2004). Marketing the corporate university or enterprise academy. Journal of Workplace Learning,16(7), 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tannir, A. A. (2002). The corporate university model for continuous learning, training and development. Education + Training,44(2), 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazier, T. (2016). Successful evaluation by design. In S. Frasard & F. Prasuhn (Eds.), Training initiatives and strategies for the modern workforce (pp. 1–18). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. (1997). Buckman laboratories learning center. Journal of Knowledge Management,1(3), 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal,22(2), 338–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farias, V., Oliveira, J., & Souza, J. (2009). Knowledge management integrating organizational learning in a military context: The 3M model. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management,9(1), 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, R. M., & Gibbs, P. A. (1998). Lifelong learning at the corporate university. Career Development International,3(5), 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghomi, H., & Barzinpour, F. (2018). Identifying the success factors of knowledge management tools in research projects (case study: A corporate university). Management Science Letters,8(8), 805–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C. (2001). Re-imagining relevance: A response to starkey and madan. British Journal of Management,12(SPEC. ISS.), S27–S32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerci, M., Bartezzaghi, E., & Solari, L. (2010). Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: A stakeholder-based analysis. International Journal of Training and Development,14(4), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., & Jaumard, B. (1997). Cluster analysis and mathematical programming. Mathematical Programming,79(1–3), 191–215.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hilse, H., & Nicolai, A. T. (2004). Strategic learning in Germany’s largest companies. The Journal of Management Development,23(3/4), 372–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P., & Pyman, A. (2006). Corporate universities: A catalyst for strategic human resource development? Journal of European Industrial Training,30(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, G., & MacPherson, A. (2005). E-learning in the corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training,29(1 SPEC. ISS.), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanović, L., & Ho, Y. S. (2017). Highly cited articles in the education and educational research category in the Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Review,71, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansink, F., Kwakman, K., & Streumer, J. (2005). The knowledge-productive corporate university. Journal of European Industrial Training,29(1 SPEC. ISS.), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Kavanagh, P., & Mattson, K. (Eds.) (2003). Steal this university: The rise of the corporate university and the academic labor movement. Psychology Press.

  • Khan, M. A. (2017). The emerging corporate university system. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Business education and ethics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1469–1492). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika,29(1), 1–27.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, A. G., & Cohen, E. (2007). Building a holistic development framework. In M. Allen (Ed.), The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities (pp. 19–38). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2010). Design of blended training for transfer into the workplace. British Journal of Educational Technology,41(2), 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenderman, H., & Sandelands, E. (2002). Learning for a purpose: Building a corporate university. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,14(7), 382–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenderman, L., & Sandelands, E. (2005). Breaking the educational glass ceiling: An interview with Harry Lenderman. Education + Training,47(2), 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui Abel, A., & Li, J. (2012). Exploring the corporate university phenomenon: Development and implementation of a comprehensive survey. Human Resource Development Quarterly,23(1), 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Amaya, C., De La Hoz, R., Gómez-Velásquez, A., Manjarrés-Salas, A., Vidal, J., Jaramillo, O., et al. (2016). Corporate university and organizational learning: A theoretical framework. [Universidad corporativa y aprendizaje organizacional: Un marco de referencia]. Direccion y Organizacion,58, 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, A., Homan, G., & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The implementation and use of e-learning in the corporate university. Journal of Workplace Learning,17(1–2), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRoberts, M., & MacRoberts, B. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics,36(3), 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,32(6), 663–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masalimova, A. R., Ikramova, G. D., Shaidullina, A. R., Gubaidullina, G. T., & Apraksina, N. D. (2014). Distant in-company foreign language learning involving university students–tutors. American Journal of Applied Sciences,11(7), 1123–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. (1997). Aqua universitas. Journal of Knowledge Management,1(2), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,41(6), 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, J. C. (1998). Ten steps to creating a corporate university. T and D,52(11), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naggy, J., & Robb, A. (2008). Can universities be good corporate citizens? Critical Perspectives on Accounting,19(8), 1414–1430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, M. D. (1998). Teaching to learn and learning to teach: Notes toward building a university in a management consulting firm. Career Development International,3(5), 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parshakov, P., & Shakina, E. A. (2018). With or without CU: A comparative study of efficiency of European and Russian corporate universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital,19(1), 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R., Peters, G., Storey, J., & Taylor, S. (2005). Corporate universities as strategic learning initiatives. In R. Paton, G. Peters, J. Storey, & S. Taylor (Eds.), Handbook of corporate university development-initiatives in public and private domain (pp. 5–16). England: Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrucco, A. S., Pellizzoni, E., & Buganza, T. (2017). The design process of corporate universities: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Workplace Learning,29(4), 304–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • People Matters. (2016). Corporate universities: The age of learning. Retrieved from https://www.peoplematters.in/article/corporate/corporate-universities-age-learning-13541?utm_source=peoplematters&utm_medium=interstitial&utm_campaign=learnings-of-the-day. Accessed 11 Sep 2018.

  • Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,19(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of operations management, 27(3), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. A., Hauser, K., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,93(2), 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Allison, S. (2003). Corporate university developments in the UK SME sector. Journal of Workplace Learning,15(5), 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Beaver, G. (2001). The rise and rise of the corporate university: the emerging corporate learning agenda. The International Journal ofManagement Education, 1(2), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Beaver, G. (2002). Redefining the role of the corporate university: A UK perspective. Industry and Higher Education,16(4), 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Stewart, J. (2001). Corporate universities–an analytical framework. Journal of Management Development, 21(10), 794–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). Corporate universities—An analytical framework. Journal of Management Development,21(10), 794–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research,XX, 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, J. X. (2009). Corporate universities in china: Processes, issues and challenges. Journal of Workplace Learning,21(2), 166–174.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rademakers, M. (2005). Corporate universities: Driving force of knowledge innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning,17(1–2), 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademakers, M. (2014). Corporate universities. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhéaume, L., & Gardoni, M. (2015). The challenges facing corporate universities in dealing with open innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning.,27(4), 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, B. C. P., & Armellini, A. (2013). Interaction and effectiveness of corporate e-learning programmes. Human Resource Development International,16(4), 480–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, M. H., & Elfner, E. (2002). Analyzing student satisfaction with instructional technology techniques. Industrial and Commercial Training,34(7), 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L., Prince, C., & Turner, P. (2015). The changing and developing role of the corporate university post-millennium. Industry and Higher Education,29(3), 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá Freire, P., Dandolini, G., Souza, J. A., & Silva, S. M. (2017). Corporate university network (C.U.N.) implementation process. [Processo de implantação da universidade corporativa em rede (UCR)]. Espacios,37(23), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelands, E. (1997). Developing a robust model of the virtual corporate university. Journal of Knowledge Management,1(3), 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarso, E. (2017). Corporate universities as knowledge management tools. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems,47(4), 538–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, L., & Russell, D. (2005). Curriculum design and management in the Digital Media U. Applying the corporate university concept to a business sub-sector. Journal of Workplace Learning,17(1–2), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, W. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2012). Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research. Scientometrics,94(3), 1317–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Tsai, C. H. (2015). Supply chain management: Exploring the intellectual structure. Scientometrics,105(1), 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Yang, H. S. (2018). Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks. International Journal of Information Management,37(5), 390–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,24(4), 265–269.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of science: disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of information science, 11(4), 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhardt, I., Schneijderberg, C., Götze, N., Baumann, J., & Krücken, G. (2017). Mapping the quality assurance of teaching and learning in higher education: The emergence of a specialty? Higher Education,74(2), 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A., Holton, E., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2000). Unfulfilled prophecy: The evolution of corporate colleges. The Journal of Higher Education,71(3), 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review,4, 356–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review,15(4), 404–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondsen, E., & Vickery, K. (1997). Learning on demand. Journal of Knowledge Management,1(3), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics,111(2), 1053–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, A., Stoffels, G., Bauer, E. K., Lohmann, P., Blau, T., Fink, G. R., et al. (2018). Static and dynamic 18 F-FET PET for the characterization of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging,45(3), 443–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S. (2018). Mapping the intellectual structure of the big data research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ),31(1), 21–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizcaya-Piñeros, P., & Uribe-Atehortúa, E. J. (2014). Aportes de la Universidad Corporativa a laventaja competitiva de las organizaciones en Colombia. Colombia: Universidad de Medellín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multistage patent citation analysis. Research Policy,34(10), 1591–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. (2005). Would the real corporate university please stand up? Journal of European Industrial Training,29(1), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. G., Li, J., Qiao, X., & Sun, J. Y. (2010). Understanding the corporate university phenomenon: A human capital theory perspective. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,10(2), 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Liang, H., Jia, Y., Ge, S., Xue, Y., & Wang, Z. (2016). Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis. Decision Support Systems,86, 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wognum, I., & Fond Lam, J. (2000). Stakeholder involvement in strategic HRD aligning: The impact on HRD effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development,4(2), 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2015). Corporate university: An innovation of organizational learning in China. New York: SCPG Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammuto, R. F. (2008). Accreditation and the globalization of business. Academy of Management Learning and Education,7(2), 256–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Boies, K. (2018). Corporate university: A systems thinking situating senior leader assessment and development in context to enhance organizational viability. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,11(4), 669–676.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibhav Singh.

Appendix: 76 high cited corporate university articles

Appendix: 76 high cited corporate university articles

No.

Authors

Title

Year

Cited by

v1

Dove R.

Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise

1999

116

v2

Homan G., MacPherson A.

E-learning in the corporate university

2005

41

v3

Zuber-Skerritt O.

A model of values and actions for personal knowledge management

2005

34

v4

Clarke T., Hermens A.

Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning

2001

33

v5

Macpherson A., Homan G., Wilkinson K.

The implementation and use of e-learning in the corporate university

2005

28

v6

Blass E.

The rise and rise of the corporate university

2005

27

v7

El-Tannir A.A.

The corporate university model for continuous learning, training and development

2002

24

v8

Prince C., Stewart J.

Corporate universities—an analytical framework

2002

23

v9

Blass E.

What’s in a name? A comparative study of the traditional public university and the corporate university

2001

23

v10

Smith E.A.

Communities of competence: new resources in the workplace

2005

22

v11

Dealtry R.

Strategic directions in the management of the corporate university paradigm

2000

18

v12

Lui Abel A., Li J.

Exploring the corporate university phenomenon: development and implementation of a comprehensive survey

2012

17

v13

Walton J.

Would the real corporate university please stand up?

2005

17

v14

Jansink F., Kwakman K., Streumer J.

The knowledge-productive corporate university

2005

15

v15

Andresen M.A., Lichtenberger B.L.

The corporate university landscape in Germany

2007

13

v16

Morin L., Renaud S.

Participation in corporate university training: Its effect on individual job performance

2004

13

v17

Dealtry R.

Establishing a methodology for appraising the strategic potential of the corporate university

2000

13

v18

Meister J.C.

Ten steps to creating a corporate university

1998

13

v19

Arnone M.

Corporate universities: a viewpoint on the challenges and best practices

1998

13

v20

Trondsen E., Vickery K.

Learning on demand

1997

13

v21

Guerci M., Bartezzaghi E., Solari L.

Training evaluation in Italian corporate universities: a stakeholder-based analysis

2010

12

v22

Nagy J., Robb A.

Can universities be good corporate citizens?

2008

12

v23

Shaw S.

The corporate university: global or local phenomenon?

2005

12

v24

Dealtry R.

How to configure the corporate university for success

2001

12

v25

Lingham T., Richley B., Rezania D.

An evaluation system for training programs: A case study using a four-phase approach

2006

11

v26

Holland P., Pyman A.

Corporate universities: a catalyst for strategic human resource development?

2006

11

v27

Dealtry R.

Configuring the corporate university—managing a portfolio of thinking schools

2001

11

v28

Pietrykowski B.

Information technology and commercialization of knowledge: corporate universities and class dynamics in an era of technological restructuring

2001

10

v29

Crocetti C.

Corporate learning—a knowledge management perspective

2001

10

v30

Stumpf S.A.

Corporate universities of the future

1998

10

v31

Bober C.F., Bartlett K.R.

The utilization of training program evaluation in corporate universities

2004

9

v32

Dealtry R.

Case research into corporate university developments

2000

9

v33

Nevins M.D.

Teaching to learn and learning to teach: notes toward building a university in a management consulting firm

1998

9

v34

Antonelli G., Cappiello G., Pedrini G.

The corporate university in the European utility industries

2013

8

v35

Hilse H., Nicolai A.T.

Strategic learning in Germany’s largest companies: empirical evidence on the role of corporate universities within strategy processes

2004

8

v36

Eccles G.

Marketing the corporate university or enterprise academy

2004

8

v37

Campbell I., Dealtry R.

The new generation of corporate universities—co-creating sustainable enterprise and business development solutions

2003

8

v38

Roy M.H., Elfner E.

Analyzing student satisfaction with instructional technology techniques

2002

8

v39

Dealtry R.

Managing the issue of learning relevance in the formulation of corporate learning strategies

2002

8

v40

Wang G.G., Li J., Qiao X., Sun J.Y.

Understanding the corporate university phenomenon: a human capital theory perspective

2010

7

v41

Clinton M.S., Merritt K.L., Murray S.R.

Using corporate universities to failitate knowledge transfer and achieve competitive advantage: an exploratory model based on media richness and type of knowledge to be transferred

2009

7

v42

Dealtry R.

Issues relating to learning accreditation in corporate university management

2003

7

v43

Dealtry R.

Managing the corporate university learning curve

2002

7

v44

Alagaraja M., Li J.

Utilizing institutional perspectives to investigate the emergence, rise, and (relative) decline of corporate universities

2015

6

v45

Dealtry R.

Achieving integrated performance management with the corporate university

2005

6

v46

Dealtry R.

Case research into the evolution of a corporate university development process

2000

6

v47

Sandelands E.

Developing a robust model of the virtual corporate university

1997

6

v48

Rhéaume L., Gardoni M.

The challenges facing corporate universities in dealing with open innovation

2015

5

v49

Qiao J.X.

Corporate universities in China: processes, issues and challenges

2009

5

v50

Dealtry R.

Managing the corporate university watershed

2002

5

v51

Fulmer R.M., Gibbs P.A.

Lifelong learning at the corporate university

1998

5

v52

Ellis S.

Buckman Laboratories Learning Center

1997

5

v53

Matthews P.

Aqua Universitas

1997

5

v54

Sham C.

An exploratory study of corporate universities in China

2007

4

v55

Dealtry R.

Managing the transition to the corporate university—a synthesis of client research

2001

4

v56

Dealtry R.

Interim reflections on the corporate university and SME academy business development innovation and its diffusion

2008

3

v57

Prince C., Allison S.

Corporate university developments in the UK SME sector

2003

3

v58

Byrd M.D.

Back to the future for higher education Medieval universities

2001

3

v59

Parshakov P., Shakina E.A.

With or without CU: a comparative study of efficiency of European and Russian corporate universities

2018

2

v60

Dealtry R.D., Howard K.H.

Moving towards optimising demand-led learning: the 2005–2007 ECUANET Leonardo Da Vinci Project

2008

2

v61

Lenderman H., Sandelands E.

Breaking the educational glass ceiling: an interview with Harry Lenderman

2005

2

v62

Lenderman H., Sandelands E.

Learning for a purpose: building a corporate university

2002

2

v63

Patrucco A.S., Pellizzoni E., Buganza T.

The design process of corporate universities: a stakeholder approach

2017

1

v64

Alajoutsijärvi K., Kettunen K.

The “Dean’s Squeeze” revisited: a contextual approach

2016

1

v65

Ryan L., Prince C., Turner P.

The changing and developing role of the corporate university post-millennium

2015

1

v66

Li J., Abel A.L.

Prioritizing + maximizing: the impact of corporate universities

2011

1

v67

Selby L., Russell D.

Curriculum design and management in the Digital Media U. Applying the corporate university concept to a business sub-sector

2005

1

v68

Dealtry R.

The real-time corporate university becomes a reality

2002

1

v69

[No author name available]

Motorola adapts training to modern business demands

2002

1

v70

Doody K.J.

Implementing a corporate-university relations program

2001

1

v71

Ghomi H., Barzinpour F.

Identifying the success factors of knowledge management tools in research projects (case study: a corporate university)

2018

1

v72

Cappiello G., Pedrini G.

The performance evaluation of corporate universities

2017

1

v73

Scarso E.

Corporate universities as knowledge management tools

2017

1

v74

Farias V., Oliveira J., Souza J.

Knowledge management integrating organizational learning in a military context: the 3M model

2009

1

v75

[No author name available]

Corporate universities: graduating with honours?

2008

1

v76

[No author name available]

Corporate universities in Germany: implementing and developing the organization’s strategy through learning

2007

1

v77

Dealtry R., Settle D.

Integrating programme and process performance QA

2005

1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, V., Verma, S. & Chaurasia, S.S. Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses. Scientometrics 122, 1275–1302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03328-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03328-0

Keywords

Navigation