Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperation networks in the area of health: systematic literature review

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difficulties and challenges of cooperation networks in the area of health originate the need for more transparent policies to improve the quality of service, focusing on the main actors involved and analysis of the emerging trend in research. Through a systematic literature review covering the last 20 years, articles were selected from the Scopus database, where 70 studies were analysed after using sorting criteria according to the SMARTER method. Studies were categorized in two areas focusing on public health, identifying the main actors involved in cooperation processes and in theories and cooperation in health, filling a major gap in the literature. By identifying and attributing the participation of the actors involved, it is possible to understand and plan public health activities because they are organized efforts of society as a whole that seeks not only the cure of diseases but the prevention and prolongation of healthy life. This study contributes to the literature showing the main groups of actors involved in cooperation in health and listing the theoretical models and theories that are gradually becoming part of the theoretical framework of research in this area, summarizing the relevant literature. The direction of future agenda on cooperation networks in health focusing on participation of different actors provides innovates, based on the remaining gaps around the theme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Authors’ elaboration

Fig. 2

Source: Adapted from Keeney and Raiffa (1976)

Fig. 3

Source: Authors’ elaboration

Fig. 4

Source: Authors’ elaboration

Fig. 5

Source: Authors’ elaboration

Fig. 6

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aveling, E., Martin, G., Armstrong, N., Banerjee, J., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2012). Quality improvement through clinical communities: Eight lessons for practice. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management,26(2), 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K. M. (2009). Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships. Evaluation and Program Planning,32(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P., Gustafson, S., Beaubien, J. M., Salas, E., & Barach, P. (2005). Medical teamwork and patient safety: The evidence-based relation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfod, M. B., Kaplan, S., Frenzel, I., & Klauenberg, J. (2016). COPE-SMARTER—A decision support system for analysing the challenges, opportunities and policy initiatives: A case study of electric commercial vehicles market diffusion in Denmark. Research in Transportation Economics,55, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. A., & Barrett, J. A. (1996). The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone,18(3), S209–S213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, T., Enise, S. V., & Marlise, C. B. (2007). Cooperação, Estratégia, Redes de Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Regional: o caso Unijuí/Sedai. Desenvolvimento em Questão, 5 (jul–dez). ISSN 1678-4855. Retrieved May 2, 2019 from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75251008.

  • Bednarik, P., Fehl, K., & Semmann, D. (2014). Costs for switching partners reduce network dynamics but not cooperative behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,281(1792), 20141661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehler, G. P., & Wray, L. O. (2012). Behavioral health providers’ perspectives of delivering behavioral health services in primary care: A qualitative analysis. BMC Health Services Research,12(1), 337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boustani, M. A., Frame, A., Munger, S., Healey, P., Westlund, J., Farlow, M., et al. (2012). Connecting research discovery with care delivery in dementia: The development of the Indianapolis discovery network for dementia. Clinical Interventions in Aging,7, 509–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broer, T., Nieboer, A. P., & Bal, R. A. (2010). Opening the black box of quality improvement collaboratives: An actor-network theory approach. BMC Health Services Research,10, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunger, A. C., Doogan, N., Hanson, R. F., & Birken, S. A. (2018). Advice-seeking during implementation: A network study of clinicians participating in a learning collaborative. Implementation Science,13(1), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. W., Cranmer, S., Harvey, C., & Warren, K. (2018). Therapeutic community graduates cluster together in social networks: Evidence for spatial selection as a cooperative mechanism in therapeutic communities. Addictive Behaviors,79, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, F. C. A., Santoro, F. M., & Borges, (2003). Cooperação e aprendizagem on line. Rio de Janeiro: PD&A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, S. (2003). Knowledge managing and knowledge management system in inter-organizational networks. Knowledge and Process Management,10(3), 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, T. J., Morgan, G. P., Jones, J., McDaniel, A. M., Weaver, M. T., Weiner, B., et al. (2015). Hypothesis generation using network structures on community health center cancer-screening performance. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,57, 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causadias, J. M., Sroufe, A. L., & Herreros, F. (2011). The establishment of an attachment research network in Latin America: Goals, accomplishments, and challenges. Attachment and Human Development,13(2), 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first 2 years. Medical Care,45(5 SUPPL. 1), S3–S11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J., & Chiu, M. (2014). A robust technical platform planning method to assure competitive advantage under uncertainties. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory Applications and Practice,21(6), 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choulak, M., Marage, D., Gisbert, M., Paris, M., & Meinard, Y. (2019). A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies—With an application to wetland prioritization. Science of the Total Environment,655, 384–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christens, B. D. (2012). Toward relational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology,50(1–2), 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, F., & Lorange, P. (1988). Why should firms co-operate? In F. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business (pp. 3–18). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainty, K. N., Scales, D. C., Sinuff, T., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Competition in collaborative clothing: A qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU. BMJ Quality and Safety,22(4), 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management,26(1), 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Rijk, A., van Raak, A., & van der Made, J. (2007). A new theoretical model for cooperation in public health settings: The RDIC model. Qualitative Health Research,17(8), 1103–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieng-Kuntz, R., Minier, D., Růžička, M., Corby, F., Corby, O., & Alamarguy, L. (2006). Building and using a medical ontology for knowledge management and cooperative work in a health care network. Computers in Biology and Medicine,36(7–8), 871–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J. G. (2010). Multi-criteria clinical decision support: A primer on the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient,3(4), 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driedger, M. S., Gallois, C., Sanders, C. B., & Santesso, N. (2006). Finding common ground in team-based qualitative research using the convergent interviewing method. Qualitative Health Research,16(8), 1145–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, K. (2016). Exchanging expertise and constructing boundaries: The development of a transnational knowledge network around heroin-assisted treatment. International Journal of Drug Policy,31, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, J. M., & Holosko, M. J. (2004). The story behind the story of collaborative networks–relationships do matter! Journal of Health & Social Policy,19(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,60, 306–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llimos, F. (2018). Differences and similarities between journal impact factor and citescore. Pharmacy Practice,16(1), 1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, N., Tetzlaff, B., Werle, J., Geister, C., Scherer, M., Weyerer, S., et al. (2016). Interprofessional collaboration in nursing homes (interprof): A grounded theory study of general practitioner experiences and strategies to perform nursing home visits. BMC Family Practice,17(1), 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, E. W., Wells, R., & Bailey, B. (2004). Sustainable network advantages: A game theoretic approach to community-based health care coalitions. Health Care Management Review,29(2), 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal Lean Six Sigma,6(3), 226–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, V., Cercone, J., & Briceño, R. (2004). Separating financing from provision: Evidence from 10 years of partnership with health cooperatives in Costa Rica. Health Policy and Planning,19(5), 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review,48, 178–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Criado, R., Vilone, D., & Sánchez, A. (2011). Evolutionary games defined at the network mesoscale: The public goods game. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.),21(1), 016113.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, P. G., Smith, D. E., Hullett, S., Kratt, P. P., & Kennard, P. (1999). Cancer prevention in rural primary care: An academic–practice partnership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,16(3 Suppl.), 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. M., Allen, J. O., Zimmerman, M. A., Morrel-Samuels, S., Reischl, T. M., Cohen, S. E., et al. (2008). Organizational empowerment in community mobilization to address youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,34(3 SUPPL.), S89–S99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grujić, J., Röhl, T., Semmann, D., Milinski, M., & Traulsen, A. (2012). Consistent strategy updating in spatial and non-spatial behavioral experiments does not promote cooperation in social networks. PLoS ONE,7(11), e7718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1985). Strategies for joint ventures. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and cases—Competitiveness and globalization concepts (6th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeijmakers, M., Harting, J., & Jansen, M. (2013). Academic collaborative centre Limburg: A platform for knowledge transfer and exchange in public health policy, research and practice? Health Policy,111(2), 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. K. (2003). Enterprise PACS and image distribution. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics,27(2–3), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, M. W., De Leeuw, E., Hoeijmakers, M., & De Vries, N. K. (2012). Working at the nexus between public health policy, practice and research. dynamics of knowledge sharing in the Netherlands. Health Research Policy and Systems,10, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, M. W. J., De Vries, N. K., Kok, G., & Van Oers, H. A. M. (2008). Collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health in the Netherlands. Health Policy,86(2–3), 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Houston, M. (2000). A re-examination of the motives and gains in joint ventures. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,35(1), 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, S., Kumpusalo-Vauhkonen, A., Järvensivu, T., Mäntylä, A., Pohjanoksa-Mäntylä, M., & Airaksinen, M. (2016). Towards interprofessional networking in medication management of the aged: Current challenges and potential solutions in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care,34(4), 368–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp-Becker, I., Poustka, L., Bachmann, C., Ehrlich, S., Hoffmann, F., Kanske, P., et al. (2017). Study protocol of the ASD-net, the German research consortium for the study of autism spectrum disorder across the lifespan: From a better etiological understanding, through valid diagnosis, to more effective health care. BMC Psychiatry,17(1), 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Y., Sanford, S., Sider, D., Moore, K., Garber, G., De Villa, E., et al. (2017). Effective communication of public health guidance to emergency department clinicians in the setting of emerging incidents: A qualitative study and framework. BMC Health Services Research,17(1), 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, T., & Evans, Y. (2015). Social media for lifelong learning. International Review of Psychiatry,27(2), 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, G., Gurabardhi, Z., Gottlieb, N. H., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2015). Influencing organizations to promote health. Health Education & Behavior,42(1 suppl), 123S–132S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno, T. (2011). A condition for cooperation in a game on complex networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology,269(1), 224–233.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J., Leckie, G., Miller, A., & Hames, R. (2015). Multilevel modeling analysis of dyadic network data with an application to Ye’kwana food sharing. American Journal of Physical Anthropology,157(3), 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lairumbi, G. M., Parker, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Mike, E. C. (2011). Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics,12(1), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Ahn, H. S., Kwon, S. K., & Kim, S. (2018). Cooperative and competitive contextual effects on social cognitive and empathic neural responses. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research,13(1), 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. C., Cunningham, F. C., Carswell, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2014). Patterns of collaboration in complex networks: The example of a translational research network. BMC Health Services Research,14(1), 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano, S., Arenas, A., & Sánchez, A. (2008). Mesoscopic structure conditions the emergence of cooperation on social networks. PLoS ONE,3(4), e1892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, A. H., Dickin, K. L., Constas, M. A., & Dollahite, J. S. (2017). The relationship between community nutritionists’ use of policy, systems and environmental strategies to prevent obesity and its determinants depends on networking. Public Health Nutrition,20(12), 2225–2235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, D. A., Harris, J. K., Shelton, S., Carothers, B. J., Mueller, N. B., & Allen, P. (2010). Systems analysis of collaboration in 5 national tobacco control networks. American Journal of Public Health,100(7), 1290–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, J., Cousens, L., & Barnes, M. (2011). Look who’s linked with whom: A case study of one community basketball network. Journal of Sport Management,25(6), 562–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantoura, P., Gendron, S., & Potvin, L. (2007). Participatory research in public health: Creating innovative alliances for health. Health and Place,13(2), 440–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2001). Income inequality, social environment, and inequalities in health. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,20(1), 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, D., & Di Vincenzo, F. (2011). Understanding hospital performance: The role of network ties and patterns of competition. Health Care Management Review,36(4), 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, D., Di Vincenzo, F., & Cicchetti, A. (2012). Dynamic analysis of interhospital collaboration and competition: Empirical evidence from an Italian regional health system. Health Policy,105(2–3), 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, D., Di Vincenzo, F., Iacopino, V., Fantini, M. P., & Cicchetti, A. (2015). Unfolding similarity in interphysician networks: The impact of institutional and professional homophily. BMC Health Services Research,15(1), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, J. A., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., Cuesta, J. A., Gracia-Lazaro, C., Moreno, Y., & Sanchez, A. (2013). Gender differences in cooperation: Experimental evidence on high school students. PLoS ONE,8(12), e83700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O., & Von Neumann, J. (1953, 1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Nagarajan, R., Kalinka, A. T., & Hogan, W. R. (2013). Evidence of community structure in biomedical research grant collaborations. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,46(1), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, C., Timpka, T., & Lindqvist, K. (2009). What promotes sustainability in safe community programmes? BMC Health Services Research,9, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science,314(5805), 1560–1563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsuki, H., & Nowak, M. A. (2007). Direct reciprocity on graphs. Journal of Theoretical Biology,247(3), 462–470.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. L., & Dorai, V. K. (1992). Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi. European Journal of Operational Research,60(1), 117–129.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Holloway, I. W., Rice, E., Fuentes, D., Wu, Q., & Chamberlain, P. (2011). Social networks and implementation of evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems: A mixed-methods study. Implementation Science,6(1), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putland, C., Baum, F., Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K., & Pomagalska, D. (2013). Enabling pathways to health equity: Developing a framework for implementing social capital in practice. BMC Public Health,13(1), 517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranmuthugala, G., Cunningham, F. C., Plumb, J. J., Long, J., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., et al. (2011). A realist evaluation of the role of communities of practice in changing healthcare practice. Implementation Science,6(1), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retrum, J. H., Chapman, C. L., & Varda, D. M. (2013). Implications of network structure on public health collaboratives. Health Education and Behavior,40(1 Suppl), 13S–23S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, J., Silva, P., Duarte, R., Davids, K., & Garganta, J. (2017). Team sports performance analysed through the lens of social network theory: Implications for research and practice. Sports Medicine,47(9), 1689–1696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R., & Goodwin, P. (2002). Weights approximations in multi-attribute decision models. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,11, 291–303.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing,21(4), 429–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutten-Van Mölken, M., Leijten, F., Hoedemakers, M., Tsiachristas, A., Verbeek, N., Karimi, M., et al. (2018). Strengthening the evidence-base of integrated care for people with multi-morbidity in Europe using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). BMC Health Services Research,18(1), 576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandurra, I., Hägglund, M., & Koch, S. (2008). From user needs to system specifications: Multi-disciplinary thematic seminars as a collaborative design method for development of health information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,41(4), 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigaki, K., Wang, Z., Tanimoto, J., & Fukuda, E. (2013). Effect of initial fraction of cooperators on cooperative behavior in evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game. PLoS ONE,8(11), e76942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovdal, M., Magutshwa-Zitha, S., Campbell, C., Nyamukapa, C., & Gregson, S. (2017). Getting off on the wrong foot? How community groups in Zimbabwe position themselves for partnerships with external agencies in the HIV response. Globalization and Health,13(1), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe-Leistico, K. J., Young, C. P., Mulvey, L. A., McCall, R. B., Petruska, M., Barone-Martin, C., et al. (2012). Blending theory with practice: Implementing kindergarten transition using the interactive systems framework. American Journal of Community Psychology,50(3–4), 357–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitters, H. P. E. M., Van Oers, J. A. M., Sandu, P., Lau, C. J., Quanjel, M., Dulf, D., et al. (2017). Developing a policy game intervention to enhance collaboration in public health policymaking in three European countries. BMC Public Health,17(1), 961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private–public policy nexus in the global agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, A., Clarke, N., & Higgs, M. (2019). Shared leadership in commercial organizations: A systematic review of definitions, theoretical frameworks and organizational outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews,21(1), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trostle, J. A., Hubbard, A., Scott, J., Cevallos, W., Bates, S. J., & Eisenberg, J. N. S. (2008). Raising the level of analysis of food-borne outbreaks: Food-sharing networks in rural coastal Ecuador. Epidemiology,19(3), 384–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallbona, C., Tobias, P. R., Moffet, C., Baker, R. L., & Beggs, S. (1973). Computer support for a neighborhood health clinic: Design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME,20(3), 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varda, D., Shoup, J. A., & Miller, S. (2012). A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: Implications for public health practice and research. American Journal of Public Health,102(3), 564–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukov, J., Santos, F. C., & Pacheco, J. M. (2011). Escaping the tragedy of the commons via directed investments. Journal of Theoretical Biology,287(1), 37–41.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wardil, L., & Hauert, C. (2016). Targeted cooperative actions shape social networks. PLoS ONE,11(1), e0147850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R., & Weiner, B. J. (2007). Adapting a dynamic model of interorganizational cooperation to the health care sector. Medical Care Research and Review,64(5), 518–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Smaldino, S. (2007). Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning,30(4), 364–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zickafoose, J. S., Kimmey, L. D., Tomas, A., Esposito, D., & Rich, E. (2014). Evaluating collaborations in comparative effectiveness research: Opportunities and challenges for social network analysis. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,3(6), 667–675.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments that contributed to the development of this paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from FCT and FEDER/COMPETE through Grant UID/ECO/04007/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Beira Interior, Estrada do Sineiro, 6200-209, Covilhã, Portugal

    Isabel Cristina Panziera Marques

  2. Department of Management and Economics, CEFAGE-UBI Research Center, University of Beira Interior, Estrada do Sineiro, 6200-209, Covilhã, Portugal

    Mário Franco

Authors
  1. Isabel Cristina Panziera Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mário Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mário Franco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, I.C.P., Franco, M. Cooperation networks in the area of health: systematic literature review. Scientometrics 122, 1727–1750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03341-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation