Skip to main content
Log in

HNRWalker: recommending academic collaborators with dynamic transition probabilities in heterogeneous networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-source information not only helps to solve the problem of sparse data but also improves recommendation performance in terms of personalization and accuracy. However, how to utilize it for facilitating academic collaboration effectively has been little studied in previous studies. Traditional mechanisms such as random walk algorithms are often assumed to be static which ignores crucial features of the linkages among various nodes in multi-source information networks. Therefore, this paper builds a heterogeneous network constructed by institution network and co-author network and proposes a novel random walk model for academic collaborator recommendation. Specifically, four neighbor relationships and the corresponding similarity assessment measures are identified according to the characteristics of different relationships in the heterogeneous network. Further, an improved random walk algorithm known as “Heterogeneous Network-based Random Walk” (HNRWalker) with dynamic transition probability and a new rule for selecting candidates are proposed. According to our validation results, the proposed method performs better than the benchmarks in improving recommendation performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamic, L. A., & Adar, E. (2003). Friends and neighbors on the web. Social networks,25(3), 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshareef, A. M., Alhamid, M. F., & El Saddik, A. (2018). Recommending Scientific Collaboration Based on Topical, Authors and Venues Similarities. In Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE international conference on information reuse and integration (IRI) (pp. 55–61). IEEE.

  • Bergé, L. R. (2017). Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science,96(4), 785–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations). Scientometrics,102(1), 455–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandao, M. A., & Moro, M. M. (2012). Affiliation influence on recommendation in academic social networks. In Paper presented at the AMW (pp. 230–234).

  • Chaiwanarom, P., & Lursinsap, C. (2015). Collaborator recommendation in interdisciplinary computer science using degrees of collaborative forces, temporal evolution of research interest, and comparative seniority status. Knowledge-Based Systems,75, 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuan, P. M., Ali, M., Khang, T. D., & Dey, N. (2018). Link prediction in co-authorship networks based on hybrid content similarity metric. Applied Intelligence,48(8), 2470–2486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Ebel, L. (2013). Recommending collaborators using keywords. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 959–962). ACM.

  • Davoodi, E., Kianmehr, K., & Afsharchi, M. (2013). A semantic social network-based expert recommender system. Applied Intelligence,39(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, L., Li, C., Chen, H., Tan, L., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Probabilistic SimRank computation over uncertain graphs. Information Sciences,295, 521–535.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, W., Yang, G., & Hu, Z. (2018). An improved DV-Hop algorithm with Jaccard coefficient based on optimization of distance correction. In Paper presented at the international conference on bio-inspired computing: theories and applications (pp. 457–465). Springer.

  • Guo, Y., & Chen, X. (2014). Cross-domain scientific collaborations prediction with citation information. In Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE 38th international computer software and applications conference workshops (pp. 229–233). IEEE.

  • Hoang, D. T., Nguyen, N. T., Tran, V. C., & Hwang, D. (2019). Research collaboration model in academic social networks. Enterprise Information Systems,13(7–8), 1023–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Van Oort, F. (2009). The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science,43(3), 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Ling, C. X. (2005). Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on knowledge Data Engineering,17(3), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, T., Hoang, K., & Lam, D. (2013). Trend based vertex similarity for academic collaboration recommendation. In Paper presented at the international conference on computational collective intelligence (pp. 11–20). Springer.

  • Jung, J., Shin, K., Sael, L., & Kang, U. (2016). Random walk with restart on large graphs using block elimination. ACM Transactions on Database Systems,41(2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901736.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., Liu, X., Shakil, K. A., & Alam, M. (2017). A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective. Information Processing Management,53(4), 923–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Oh, S., Dong, H., Wang, F., & Burnett, G. (2019). Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site: A study on researchgate. Journal of the Association for Information Science Technology,70(6), 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Liang, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, H., & Ma, Y. (2016). A link prediction method for large-scale networks. Chinese Journal of Computers,39(42), 1–18.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Song, X., Lu, H., Zeng, L., Shi, M., & Liu, F. (2020). Friend recommendation for cross marketing in online brand community based on intelligent attention allocation link prediction algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications,139, 112839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Xia, F., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Asabere, N. Y., & Jiang, H. (2014). Acrec: a co-authorship based random walk model for academic collaboration recommendation. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1209–1214). ACM.

  • Liu, Z., & Jansen, B. J. (2017). Identifying and predicting the desire to help in social question and answering. Information Processing Management,53(2), 490–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luong, N. T., Nguyen, T. T., Jung, J. J., & Hwang, D. (2015). Discovering co-author relationship in bibliographic data using similarity measures and random walk model. In Paper presented at the Asian conference on intelligent information and database systems (pp. 127–136). Springer.

  • Mahapatra, R., Samanta, S., Pal, M., & Xin, Q. (2019). RSM index: A new way of link prediction in social networks. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems (Preprint), pp. 1–15.

  • Makarov, I., Bulanov, O., & Zhukov, L. E. (2016). Co-author recommender system. In Paper presented at the international conference on network analysis (pp. 251–257). Springer.

  • Montefusco, A. M., do Nascimento, F. P., Sennes, L. U., Bento, R. F., & Imamura, R. (2019). Influence of international authorship on citations in Brazilian medical journals: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,119(3), 1487–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2013). Institutional and country collaboration in an online service of scientific profiles: Google Scholar Citations. Journal of Informetrics,7(2), 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostroumova Prokhorenkova, L., & Samosvat, E. (2016). Recency-based preferential attachment models. Journal of Complex Networks,4(4), 475–499.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samanthula, B. K., & Jiang, W. (2015). Secure multiset intersection cardinality and its application to jaccard coefficient. IEEE Transactions on Dependable,13(5), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, B., Ifrim, G., & Hurley, N. (2016). Learning-to-rank for real-time high-precision hashtag recommendation for streaming news. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the 25th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1191–1202). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

  • Song, R., Xu, H., & Cai, L. (2019). Academic collaboration in entrepreneurship research from 2009 to 2018: A multilevel collaboration network analysis. Sustainability,11(19), 5172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., & Han, J. (2013). Meta-path-based search and mining in heterogeneous information networks. Tsinghua Science Technology,18(4), 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, N., Lu, Y., & Cao, Y. (2019). Career age-aware scientific collaborator recommendation in scholarly big data. IEEE Access,7, 136036–136045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symeonidis, P., & Perentis, C. (2014). Link prediction in multi-modal social networks. In Paper presented at the joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases (pp. 147–162). Springer.

  • Valdeolivas, A., Tichit, L., Navarro, C., Perrin, S., Odelin, G., Levy, N., et al. (2018). Random walk with restart on multiplex and heterogeneous biological networks. Bioinformatics,35(3), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Fang, Z., & Sun, X. (2016). Usage patterns of scholarly articles on web of science: A study on web of science usage count. Scientometrics,109(2), 917–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, I. S. (2015). Preferential attachment in randomly grown networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics its Applications,439, 85–92.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhang, G., & Ren, Y. (2017). A balanced modularity maximization link prediction model in social networks. Information Processing Management,53(1), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, F., Chen, Z., Wang, W., Li, J., & Yang, L. T. (2014). MVCWalker: Random walk-based most valuable collaborators recommendation exploiting academic factors. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing,2(3), 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Li, X., Wang, H., Xu, M., & Liu, Y. (2018). 3-HBP: A three-level hidden Bayesian link prediction model in social networks. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems,5(2), 430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Z., Ouyang, Z., Li, J., Dong, E., & Yi, D. (2018). Modelling transition phenomena of scientific coauthorship networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science Technology,69(2), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Guns, R. (2014). Predicting and recommending collaborations: An author-, institution-, and country-level analysis. Journal of Informetrics,8(2), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, L., Wang, L., Pan, L., & Yao, K. (2016). Link prediction based on common-neighbors for dynamic social network. Procedia Computer Science,83, 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahr, N., Arnaud, L., Marquet, P., Haroche, J., Costedoat-Chalumeau, N., Hulot, J. S., et al. (2010). Mycophenolic acid area under the curve correlates with disease activity in lupus patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Arthritis Rheumatism,62(7), 2047–2054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrinkalam, F., Kahani, M., & Bagheri, E. (2018). Mining user interests over active topics on social networks. Information Processing Management,54(2), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2017). Uncovering mechanisms of co-authorship evolution by multirelations-based link prediction. Information Processing Management,53(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T., Xiao, R., Sun, C., Chen, H., Li, Y., & Li, H. (2014). Personalized recommendation algorithm integrating roulette walk and combined time effect. Journal of Computer Applications,34(4), 1114–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Ding, L., Li, Z., & Wan, R. (2017). Collaborator recommendation in heterogeneous bibliographic networks using random walks. Information Retrieval Journal,20(4), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, T., Lü, L., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2009). Predicting missing links via local information. The European Physical Journal B,71(4), 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China [71701134], Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [16YJC630153], Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011392] and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2017A030310427].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiyang Bian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Liu, T., Chen, X. et al. HNRWalker: recommending academic collaborators with dynamic transition probabilities in heterogeneous networks. Scientometrics 123, 429–449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03374-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03374-z

Keywords

Navigation