Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidimensional analysis of Master thesis abstracts: a diachronic perspective

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the diachronic change of Master thesis abstracts written by Chinese students in the applied linguistics. A corpus of 1000 English abstracts was built with 100 abstracts per each year during a 10-year period from 2009 to 2018. Based on the multidimensional analysis, both the textual and linguistic changes were investigated. To be specific, the Biber’s (Variation across speech and writing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988) six-dimension model was adopted to capture the dimensional and linguistic styles of abstracts in each year. Multidimensional analysis tagger (Nini in Multidimensional analysis tagger (version 1.3), 2015. http://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger) was used to automatically extract the data including the z-scores of dimensions and linguistic features. Further analysis focusing on the linguistic features of each dimension was performed by using stepwise regression analysis. The results showed that there was a pattern of a 3-year cycle of abstract style and the textual feature of Dimension 1 and linguistic features of Dimension 1, 3 and 5 had significant differences during these years. Two reasons, internal and external, were suggested to interpret the diachronic evolution of English abstracts by Chinese students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akindele, O. (2008). A critical analysis of the literature review section of graduate dissertations at the University of Botswana. English for Specific Purposes World, 7(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asención-Delaney, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W., & Eggington, W. G. (1999). Bilingual creativity, multidimensional analysis, and World Englishes. World Englishes, 18(3), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M. T. (1978). Editorial. Scientometrics, 1(1), 3–4.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. A., & Inkster, R. P. (1980). Current-traditional rhetoric: Paradigm and practice. Freshman English News, 8(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D. (1992). The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities, 26(5–6), 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., (1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 9–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language, 65(3), 487–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzell, P. (1979). Thomas Kuhn, Scientism, and English Studies. College English, 40(7), 764–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J. (2012). The design and illustration of the EAP-oriented guidelines for EFL teaching at tertiary level. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 1–9 + 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., & Xiao, R. (2013). A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora, 8(2), 209–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the literature review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. (2006). Analysing and enacting academic criticism: The case of an L2 graduate learner of academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(4), 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. (2008). Analysing genre exemplars in preparation for writing: The case of an L2 graduate student in the ESP genre-based instructional framework of academic literacy. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U., & Moreno, A. I., (2005). Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive research methodology. In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics: Essays in honor of Robert B. Kaplan (pp. 153–164). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doró, K. (2013). Selling their research: The linguistic realization of rhetoric moves in English thesis abstracts written by Hungarian undergraduates. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doró, K. (2015). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 16(4), 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi, S. F., & Chan, S. H. (2015). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: Functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35(4), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Why are abstracts in Ph.D. theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J. (2007). The non-Anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication. AILA Review, 20(1), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J. (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “Stigma” tell us? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friginal, E. (2013). Twenty-five years of Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis: introduction to the special issue and an interview with Douglas Biber. Corpora, 8(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golebiowski, Z. (2009). Prominent messages in education and applied linguistic abstracts: How do authors appeal to their prospective readers? Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 753–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, M. (1982). The winds of change: Thomas Kuhn and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(1), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1998). Structured abstracts in the British Journal of Clinical Psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology. Science Communication, 24(3), 366–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795–2809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajňáková, D. (2015). Genre analysis of English-written Master’s theses and dissertation abstracts in the setting of Prešov University. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 12, 30–39.

  • Kruger, H., van Rooy, B., & Smith, A. (2019). Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015). Journal of English Linguistics, 47(3), 183–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzeszowski, T. P., (1984). Tertium comparationis. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Contrastive linguistics. Prospects and problems (pp. 301–312). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2016). The cultural ID in the modal system: A contrastive study of English abstracts written by Chinese and native speakers: Can modality differences be an important indicator of the China English variety? English Today, 32(4), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Wu, Z., & Shi, B. (2017). Reform of the “English for Academic Purpose” teaching for MA students in agricultural and forestry universities. Academic Degrees and Graduate Education, 4, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Arroyo, B., & Méndez-Cendón, B. (2012). Describing phraseological devices in medical abstracts: An English/Spanish contrastive analysis. Meta: Journal des Traducteurs, 52(3), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Martín, P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, B. A., & Lo, W. A. Y. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mur-Dueñas, P. (2014). ‘The main contribution of this study is… An analysis of statements of contribution in English published research articles and L2 manuscripts. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesi, H. (2009). A multidimensional analysis of student writing across levels and disciplines. In M. Edwardes (Eds.), Taking the measure of applied linguistics: Proceedings of the BAAL Annual Conference, University of Swansea, 11–13 September 2008. London: BAAL/Scitsiugnil Press.

  • Nini, A. (2015). Multidimensional analysis tagger (version 1.3). Retrieved from. http://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger.

  • Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osamu, K., (1996). The mean in original confucianism. In P. J. Ivanhoe (Ed.), Chinese language, thought, and culture: Nivison and his critics (pp. 83–93). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, N. O., & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi, N., & Meihami, H. (2018). Informetrics of Scientometrics abstracts: a rhetorical move analysis of the research abstracts published in Scientometrics journal. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1975–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and Master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English–Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016). A diachronic study on the information provided by the research titles of applied linguistics journals. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1315–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in Medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10(4), 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(2), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samar, R. G., Talebzadeh, H., Kiany, G. R., & Akbari, R. (2014). Moves and steps to sell a paper: A cross-cultural genre analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. Text and Talk, 34(6), 759–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, A. (2012). English as a lingua franca: Ontology and ideology. ELT Journal, 67(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, P. (2019). Shakespeare and the English Poets: The influence of native speaking English reviewers on the acceptance of journal articles. Publications, 7(1), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankó, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Yao, C. (2013). Some thoughts on English for academic purposes (EAP) teaching. Foreign Languages in China, 5, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A “literacy” journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J. (2014). An analysis of the EAP course significance from the higher educational perspective. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 1, 6–9 + 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, R., & Cao, Y. (2013). Native and non-native English abstracts in contrast: A multidimensional move analysis. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 27, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. (2015). Instructor’s guidance and students’ academic English writing competence development: Reflective classroom research on an academic English reading and writing course. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 5, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, W. (2018). An analysis of adverbs of certainty in Chinese learners’ academic writing. Foreign Language and Translation, 1, 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers' genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., (1978). Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In C. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research in composing (pp. 29–47). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zand-Moghadam, A., & Meihami, H. (2016). A rhetorical move analysis of TEFL thesis abstracts: The case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Liu, M. (2011). EFL teaching reform for non-English majors in Tsinghua University: From EGP to EAP. Foreign Languages Research, 5, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, B. (2015). Implications of EAP teaching at Sino-foreign cooperative universities for college English teaching in China: From the perspective of Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. Foreign Language World, 6, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Shaoliang Xie

Authors
  1. Shaoliang Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaoliang Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, S. Multidimensional analysis of Master thesis abstracts: a diachronic perspective. Scientometrics 123, 861–881 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03408-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03408-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation