Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Scientific knowledge production in China: a comparative analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past few decades, the rising economic power of China has led to the expansion of its indigenous science and technology capacity. However, the key characteristics and patterns of the Chinese catch-up process have been mainly explained based on patenting activities that only reflect the progress of technological capabilities accumulation. Therefore, this paper seeks to expand the conventional understanding of China’s technological upgrading based on the flying geese model by analyzing scientific knowledge production using hierarchical cluster analysis and examination of the similarities and differences between Chinese and latecomers’ scientific patterns. The results show that China has reached the same level of scientific publication capacity as Japan and Korea since 2006, and has recently overtaken Japan to become the biggest scientific powerhouse in the Asia Pacific region. Additionally, during the catch-up period, China’s scientific portfolio demonstrates a combination of features that resemble both Korean and Taiwanese attributes. These findings partially contradict the traditional flying geese model and point out additional interpretations of the convergence and divergence of developmental paths among advanced countries and less developed nations. The study contributes to the theory of technological dominance in East Asia and to the understanding of China’s dominant role in knowledge production worldwide. Several implications and directions for future research regarding scientific advancement in emerging economies are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akamatsu, K. (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies,1, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, E. D. M. E. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: Notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista brasileira de economia,55, 545–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, R. (1991). R&D competition for product innovation: An endless race. The American Economic Review,81(2), 252–256.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The Manchester School,33(2), 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2020). How poverty ends. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-12-03/how-poverty-ends. Accessed February 23rd 2020.

  • Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. (2005). Comparing patterns of intersectoral innovation diffusion in Taiwan and China: A network analysis. Technovation,25(2), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-Y., Liou, S.-N., & Kwan, L. (2016). Institutional and cultural contexts of creativity and innovation in China. In A. Y. Lewin, M. Kenney, & J. P. Murmann (Eds.), China's innovation challenge overcoming the middle-income trap (pp. 368–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2013). The evolutionary patterns of knowledge production in Korea. Scientometrics,94(2), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0780-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, Y.-W., Lee, L.-C., Hung, W.-C., & Lin, P.-H. (2010). Forging into the innovation lead—A comparative analysis of scientific capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management,14(03), 511–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management,11(4), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, X. (2010). Re-examining the reform of China’s science and technology system: A historical perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. L., & Hayes, R. (2004). Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower’ countries, 1978–1999. Research Policy,33(9), 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2007). ‘Triad’or ‘tetrad’? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics,74(1), 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldemberg, J. (1998). What is the role of science in developing countries? Science,279(5354), 1140–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics,8(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G. A. B. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: Implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies,20(4), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlings, E., & Van den Besselaar, P. Convergence in science: Growth and structure of worldwide scientific output, 1993–2008. In 2011 Atlanta conference on science and innovation policy, 2011 (pp. 1–19). IEEE.

  • Hu, A. (2009). Quantitative assessment of China’s economic power and science and technology power in a comparative perspective. In K. Lee, J.-H. Kim, & W. T. Woo (Eds.), Power and sustainability of the Chinese State (pp. 43–58). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization,21(6), 849–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00035-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M.-C. (2012). Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Research Policy,41(3), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., et al. (2015). A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics,102(2), 1521–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Wang, X. (2016). How does national scientific funding support emerging interdisciplinary research: A comparison study of big data research in the US and China. PLoS ONE,11(5), e0154509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinxiu, L. (2004). Scientific publication in China: An overview and some thoughts on improvement. Science, 27, 120–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (1971). The role of science and technology in developing countries. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K.-S. (2011). The co-evolution of universities' academic research and knowledge-transfer activities: The case of South Korea. Science and Public Policy,38(6), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211x12960315267930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, R., & Revesz, J. (1996). Australian science: Performance from published papers. Australian Government Pub. Service. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/science-papers/96-03.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2019.

  • Lee, K. (2011). Thirty years of catch-up in China, compared with Korea. In Y. Y. H.-M. Wu (Ed.), Reform and development in China (pp. 224–242). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2016). Innovation and technological specialization of Chinese industry. In A. Y. Lewin, M. Kenney, & J. P. Murmann (Eds.), China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle-income trap (pp. 108–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Cho, S.-J., & Jin, J. (2009a). Dynamics of catch-up in mobile phones and automobiles in China: Sectoral systems of innovation perspective. China Economic Journal,2(1), 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Hahn, D., & Lin, J. (2002). Is China following the East Asian model? A “comparative institutional analysis” perspective. China Review, 2(1), 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Jee, M., & Eun, J. H. (2011). Assessing China's economic catch-up at the firm level and beyond: Washington consensus, East Asian consensus and the Beijing model. Industry and Innovation,18(5), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.583463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Kim, J.-H., & Woo, W. T. (2009). Power and sustainability of the Chinese State. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Mathews, J. A. (2010). From Washington consensus to best consensus for world development. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature,24(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8411.2010.01251.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics,63(3), 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics,102(3), 1997–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. H., & Lian, P. (1999). Decentralization and coordination: China's credible commitment to preserve the market under authoritarianism. China Economic Review,10(2), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951x(99)00011-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. M., Li, S. H., & Zhang, W. Y. (2000). The road to capitalism: Competition and institutional change in China. Journal of Comparative Economics,28(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, I. P., & Singh, J. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy,32(6), 1031–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997). The scientific wealth of nations. Science,275(5301), 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5301.793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, R., & Nelson, R. R. (2007). Public research institutions and economic catch-up. Research Policy,36(10), 1512–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. (2002). Measuring China" s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics,53(3), 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiwo, J. P., & Tao, F. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics,95(3), 1031–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J. (1975). Science development: Toward the building of science in less developed countries. Bloomington: International Development Research Center, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2013). Worldwide topology of the scientific subject profile: A macro approach in the country level. PLoS ONE,8(12), e83222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. J. (2006). The Chinese economy: Transitions and growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science,49(2), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. (2002). China and the global business revolution. Cambridge Journal of Economics,26(1), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.1.119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odagiri, H., Goto, A., & Sunami, A. (2010). IPR and the Catch-up Process in Japan. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual property rights, development, and catch up: An international comparative study (pp. 133–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Science and technology in China: Trends and policy challenges. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019). Main science and technology indicators. Accessed September 29th 2019.

  • Okubo, Y., Miquel, J.-F., Frigoletto, L., & Doré, J.-C. (1992). Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator. Scientometrics,25(2), 321–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsmond, D. (2019). China’s economic choices. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/china-s-economic-choices. Accessed February 23rd 2020.

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics,101(3), 1897–1924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C., Wilson, C., Venuta, A., Ferrari, M., & Arreto, C.-D. (2017). Evolution of the scientific literature on drug delivery: A 1974–2015 bibliometric study. Journal of Controlled Release,260, 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (2002). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. In J. Henry & D. Mayle (Eds.), Managing innovation and change. London: The Open University & SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, P. A., & Manganote, E. J. (2012). Revisiting country research profiles: Learning about the scientific cultures. Scientometrics,93(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0696-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank [Portal] (2019). https://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed September 8th 2019.

  • Shin, J.-S. (1996). The economics of the latecomers: Catching-up, technology transfer and institutions in Germany, Japan and South Korea. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1997). Economic infrastructures and innovation systems. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 86–106). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastav, A., Kaur, T., Rani, L., & Kumar, A. (2019). Scientific research production of India and China in environmental chemistry: A bibliometric assessment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternitzke, C. (2009). Technological specialization and patenting strategies in East Asia—Insights from the electronics industry. Scientometrics,78(1), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda, M. (2019). China rises to world No. 2 in science research while Japan declines: Survey. https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190506/p2a/00m/0na/002000c. Accessed September 20 2019.

  • Tassey, G. (1991). The functions of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy. Research Policy,20(4), 345–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared largest source of research articles. Nature,553(7689), 390–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00927-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics,13(5–6), 239–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Wen, Z. (2018). Emerging nanogenerator technology in China: A review and forecast using integrating bibliometrics, patent analysis and technology roadmapping methods. Nano Energy,46, 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widgrén, M. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage in the Internal Market (No.989). ETLA Discussion Papers, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).

  • WIPO. (2018). World intellectual property indicators 2018. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-Y., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China. Research Policy,41(3), 524–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiwei, Z., & Xiangdong, Y. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation system. Technology in Society,29(3), 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J., Zhao, Z.-Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.-Z., Huang, M.-H., Lei, X.-P., et al. (2011). International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008: A perspective from paper and patent analysis. Scientometrics,91(1), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Glänzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics,82(3), 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research policy,35(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009a). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics,79(3), 593–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009b). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics,81(3), 839–857.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government [NRF-2017R1A2B4007893] and the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, under an ITRC Program, [IITP-2020-2018-0-01402].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Technology Management, College of Business, KAIST Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 305-701, South Korea

    Chi Mai Nguyen & Jae-Yong Choung

Authors
  1. Chi Mai Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jae-Yong Choung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Yong Choung.

Appendices

Appendix

See Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9 Abbreviations of the country names
Full size table
Table 10 Abbreviations of the subject fields
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, C.M., Choung, JY. Scientific knowledge production in China: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics 124, 1279–1303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03507-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03507-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation