Abstract
We perform a bibliometric analysis of the research production and impact of Mexican scholars involved in the area of metric studies of science and technology in the period 1971–2018. In order to get a strong data sample, we used a bibliometric search that includes all databases that register mainstream, local and regional journals. Our search query included 46 different features that identify properly the area of metric studies in science and technology (bibliometry, scientometry, informetry, webmetrics and altmetrics). We applied this search in both English and Spanish. Since this area of knowledge has been cultivated rather recently in Mexico, our general aim is to characterize the possible effect of local and international collaboration on the research production of Mexican scholars working in this field. Our results indicate that this production is carried out mainly in local collaborations (75.3%) and most of this production involves scholars from the same Mexican institution (30%). A scarce fraction involves collaborations with scholars from Latin American (LA) institutions (7.7%) and with institutions beyond LA (17%). Accordingly, most of this production is published in local or regional journals in Spanish. Our conclusion indicates thus that international collaboration has little influence in the Mexican research in the field of metric studies a fact that it is not shared by other areas of knowledge in Mexico. We will pursue in future work the performance of faculty members associated to local graduate programs in this area of knowledge. We feel that an improvement in the research activity of these scholars may enhance substantially the research production in the area of metric studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. (2010). Redes de colaboración científica: Análisis y visualización de patrones de coautoría. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 21(4), 5.
Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Benavent-Perez, M., De Moya-Anegon, F., & Miguel, S. (2012). International collaboration in medical research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003–2007). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(11), 3–2238.
Civis-Zaragoza, M., & Longas-Mayayo, J. (2015). La colaboración interinstitucional como respuesta al desafío de la inclusión socioeducativa. Análisis de 4 experiencias de trabajo en red a nivel local en Cataluña. Educación, 18(1), 213–236.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809–1831.
Frixione, E., Ruiz-Zamarripa, L., & Hernandez, G. (2016). Assesing individual intellectual output in scientific research: Mexico’s national system of researchers for evaluating scholras performance in the humanities and behavioral sciences. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0155732.
Garcia-Hernández, A. (2012). Las redes de colaboración científica y su efecto en la productividad. Un análisis bibliométrico. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 27(59), 159–175.
Kreimer, P., & Vessuri, H. (2017). Latin American science, technology, and society: A historical and reflexive approach. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 17–37.
Kulczycki, E., et al. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scietometrics, 116(3), 463–486.
Licea de Arena, J. (2018). Cómo asesorar una tesis. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.
Licea de Arena, J., González, C., Anguiano-Peña, G., & Gómez, L. A. (2000). Retos de los posgrados en bibliotecología y ciencia de la información en la productividad de artículos. Omnia: Revista de la Direccion General de Estudios de Posgrado, 16(40), 112–130.
Luna-Morales, M. E., & Luna-Morales, E. (2018). El ingreso a los índices de citas, ventajas de la incorporación de la ENBA al IPN. Biblioteca Universitaria, 21(2), 129–139.
Marmolejo-Leyva, R., Perez-Angon, M. A., & Russell, J. M. (2015). Mobility and international collaboration: Case of the Mexican scientific diaspora. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0126720.
Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. (2017). Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 112(2), 1111–1121.
Mukhlif, F., Hodonu-Wusu, J. O, Noordin, K. A. B., & Kasirun, Z. M. (2018). Major trends in device to device communications research: A bibliometric analysis. In: IEEE 16th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) (26–28 Nov 2018), Bangi, Malaysia.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Puljak, L., & Veri, S. G. (2014). Significance of research networking for enhancing collaboration and research productivity. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(3), 181–183.
Restrepo-Arango, C., & Urbizagastegui-Alvarado, R. (2016). Un acercamiento a los estudios bibliométricos, cienciométricos e informétricos en México. Informacao & Sociedade, 26(1), 51–71.
Restrepo-Arango, C., & Urbizagastegui-Alvarado, R. (2017). Red de co-palabras en la bibliometría mexicana. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 31(73), 17–45.
Restrepo-Arango, C., & Urbizagastegui-Alvarado, R. (2018). Red de co-autores en la bibliometría mexicana. Encontros Bibli: Revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciencia da informaçao, 23(51), 74–94.
Russell, J. M. (1995). The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology in Mexico. Scientometrics, 34(1), 45–61.
Russell, J. M., & Ainsworth, S. (2014). Mapping S&T collaboration between Latin America and Europe: Bibliometric analysis of co-authorship. In J. Gallaird & R. Arvanitis (Eds.), Research Collaboration between Europe and Latin America (pp. 43–66). Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporanes.
Salinas-Ibáñez, J., & Marín-Juarros, V. I. (2019). Metasíntesis cualitativa sobre colaboración científica e identidad digital académica en redes sociales. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2), 97–117.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2017). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.
Wusu, O. H., & Lazarus, N. G. (2018). Major trends in LIS research: A bibliometric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1873. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=5216&context=libphilprac.
Zhang, T., Qin, H. L., Wang, T., Li, H., Li, H., Xia, X., et al. (2015). Global publication trends and research hotspots of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Springerplus, 4, 776.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elena, LM.M., Evelia, LM. & Ángel, PA.M. Influence of the international collaboration in the field of metric studies of science and technology: the case of Mexico (1971–2018). Scientometrics 126, 2485–2511 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03522-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03522-5