Skip to main content
Log in

Letter to the Editor: Comments on the paper of Batagelj—on fractional approach to analysis of linked networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the role of count conservation when derived network matrices are obtained from linked network matrices using an outer product decomposition. It is seen that a full counting operation conserves the count of pathways between nodal variables while a fractional counting operation conserves the count of the nodal variable. We use the cases of co-referencing (bibliographic coupling) and co-citation with a simple citation network to illustrate the ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Batagelj, V. (2020). On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics,12, 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03383-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., & Cerinsek, M. (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics,96(3), 845–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerinsek, M., & Batagelj, V. (2015). Network analysis of Zentralblatt MATH data. Scientometrics,102(1), 977–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. G., & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures: Toward a macro- and micro-structure for science. Science Studies,4, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation,14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauze, T. K., & McGinnis, R. (1979). A matric analysis of scientific specialities and careers in science. Scientometrics,1(5–6), 419–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempel, R., & Moran, S. (2001). SALSA: The stochastic approach for link-structure analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems,19(2), 131–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Park, H. W. (2017). Full and fractional counting in bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics,11(1), 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshakova, I. (1973). System of documentation connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya,2(6), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: a comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics,10(4), 1178–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. & Mukherjee, S. (2016). A conservation rule for constructing bibliometric network matrices. arXiv:1611.08592

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,24(4), 265–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gangan Prathap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prathap, G., Mukherjee, S. Letter to the Editor: Comments on the paper of Batagelj—on fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics 124, 2717–2722 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03541-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03541-2

Keywords

Navigation