Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–2017

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific collaboration has considerably grown in recent years, and has been recognized as a positive factor for research productivity and quality. This study is aimed at exploring the collaboration in retracted publications and the influence on different kinds of scientific misbehaviors based on 4842 retracted publications in Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2017. Search results showed that the proportion of international collaborations in retracted publications has fluctuated at around 20% in the past 17 years, and different collaboration patterns of major countries are revealed. The USA and China contributed to more than half of all retracted publications, while retraction rate of Chinese papers was three times higher compared to papers from the USA. A negative correlation between the proportion of internationally collaborative publications and the retraction rate was found. Countries involved in more international collaborations tend to have lower retraction rates. Also, the occurrences of plagiarism was found to be lower when a paper is contributed by more authors, while falsification or manipulation, errors or unreliable results appeared more frequently under the same condition. Conclusions are made with a focus on the need for more actions to strengthen the scientific norms and integrity within collaborative groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Carloni, M. (2019). The balance of knowledge flows. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L. E., & Wray, K. B. (2019). Detecting errors that result in retractions. Social Studies of Science, 49(6), 942–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspura, M. K. Y. I., Noorhidawati, A., & Abrizah, A. (2018). An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes? Scientometrics, 115(3), 1315–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asubiaro, T. (2019). How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1261–1287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. M. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. M., & Taylor, D. M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15(3), 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The state of the art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassao, B. D., Herbella, F. A. M., Schlottmann, F., & Patti, M. G. (2018). Retracted articles in surgery journals. What are surgeons doing wrong? Surgery, 163(6), 1201–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, D. R., Huang, A., & Avalos, A. R. (2018). Willingness to learn: Cultural intelligence effect on perspective taking and multicultural creativity. International Business Research, 11(2), 116–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaubey, D., & Kandpal, B. (2017). A study of impression management techniques applied by academicians in select educational institutions of Dehradun. Uttaranchal Business Review, 7, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. M., Hu, Z. G., Milbank, J., & Schultz, T. (2013). A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 234–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Wang, T. (2017). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China. Scientometrics, 114(1), 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. D., & Oh, D. H. (2019). The importance of research teams with diverse backgrounds: Research collaboration in the Journal of Productivity Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 53(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • COPE. (2020). Authorship and contributorship. Retrieved February 11, 2020, from https://publicationethics.org/authorship.

  • Cornish, F., Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2007). A cultural psychological reflection on collaborative research. In Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research (Vol. 8(3)). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.3.309.

  • Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 395–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., Kozak, M., & Rajendran, P. (2019). Analysis of retractions in Indian science. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1081–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • EnagoAcademy. (2018). 8 most common types of plagiarism to stay away from! Retrieved June 15, 2019, from https://www.enago.com/academy/fraud-research-many-types-plagiarism. Accessed 15 June 2019.

  • Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine, 10(12), e1001563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, W., Dai, S., & Tang, L. (2020). The impact of international research collaboration network evolution on Chinese business school research Quality. Complexity, 2020, e7528387.

  • Foo, J. Y. (2011). A retrospective analysis of the trend of retracted publications in the field of biomedical and life sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. (2012). Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy, 41(2), 276–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e44118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs, J. C., Glass, R. I., & Kilmarx, P. H. (2019). Coauthor country affiliations in international collaborative research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2009 to 2017. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1915989.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, T. W. (2013). Retraction of global scientific publications from 2001 to 2010. Scientometrics, 96(2), 555–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current Sociology Review, 65(6), 814–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, E., Fuller, C. D., Wilson, L. D., & Thomas, C. R. (2013). Success breeds success: Authorship distribution in the Red Journal, 1975–2011. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 85(1), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2019). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’. Research Policy, 48(2), 492–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1995). Social loafing: research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khor, K. A., & Yu, L. G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1095–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfeld, D. S. (2012). Perspective: research misconduct: The search for a remedy. Academic Medicine, 87(7), 877–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroki, T., & Ukawa, A. (2018). Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications. Accountability in Research, 25(4), 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Sugimoto, C. R., & Tsou, A. (2015). Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1323–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, K., & Sluss, D. (2017). Workplace dishonesty and deception as socially situated organizational behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-122.

  • Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of wos retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1409–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Kamel, M., Jin, Y., Xu, M. K., Mbuagbaw, L., Samaan, Z., et al. (2018a). Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: A literature survey. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 11, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Li, H. J., Liu, N. R., & Liu, X. Y. (2018b). Important institutions of interinstitutional scientific collaboration networks in materials science. Scientometrics, 117(1), 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports, 3(1), e3146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M., & Sá, C. (2019). Highly cited in the South: International collaboration and research recognition among Brazil’s highly cited researchers. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(1), 39–58.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, D., & Jana, S. (2018). Collaborative authorship trend in leading Indian LIS journals. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(5), 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongeon, P., & Larivière, V. (2016). Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors’ careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 535–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morillo, F. (2019). Collaboration and impact of research in different disciplines with international funding (from the EU and other foreign sources). Scientometrics, 120(2), 807–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. A., & Goldstein, M. L. (2007). Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: A growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1764–1782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, E. C., & Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: A retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. British Medical Journal Open, 6(11), e012047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao, M. L. (1992). Global and local collaborators: A study of scientific collaboration. Information Processing & Management, 28(1), 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, H. (2019). Collaboration with countries with rapidly growing research: Supporting proactive development of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 122(1), 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21, 1011–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupovac, V., Prijic-Samarzija, S., & Petrovecki, M. (2017). Research misconduct in the Croatian scientific community: A survey assessing the forms and characteristics of research misconduct. Science and Engineering EthicsScience and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajgoli, I. U., & Laxminarsaiah, A. (2015). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of spacecraft technology. Electronic Library, 33(4), 625–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Katz, J. S. (2017). The power law relationship between citation impact and multi-authorship patterns in articles in Information Science & Library Science journals. Scientometrics, 114(3), 919–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Pham, T. (2018). The evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks: The case of the strategic management journal. Scientometrics, 116(1), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkrantz, A. B. (2016). Retracted publications within radiology journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 206(2), 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarazzati, S., & Wang, L. (2019). The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: The case of nanoscience in Chinese regions. Scientometrics, 121(2), 839–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. (2018). An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in PubMed and the Web of Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(2), 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solhaug, T., & Osler, A. (2017). Intercultural empathy among Norwegian students: An inclusive citizenship perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. C. (2013). Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software touncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes., 12(4), 264–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, S., Hossain, L., & Rasmussen, K. (2013). Network effects on scientific collaborations. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e57546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1633–1652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Lv, T., & Hamerly, D. (2019). How do altmetric sources evaluate scientific collaboration? An empirical investigation for Chinese collaboration publications. Library Hi Tech, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2019-0101.

  • Woolley, K. L., Lew, R. A., Stretton, S., Ely, J. A., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., et al. (2011). Lack of involvement of medical writers and the pharmaceutical industry in publications retracted for misconduct: a systematic, controlled, retrospective study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 27(6), 1175–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortman, J. (2006). Ethical decision-making: The effects of temporal immediacy, perspective-taking, moral courage and ethical work climate (Ph.D.). Lincoln: The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 150–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. B. (2018). The impact of collaboration on the epistemic cultures of science. In T. Boyer-Kassem, C. Mayo-Wilson & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Scientific collaboration and collective knowledge: New essays (1 ed., pp. 117–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. B., & Andersen, L. E. (2018). Retractions in science. Scientometrics, 117(3), 2009–2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2107–2118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanotto, S. R., Haeffner, C., & Guimaraes, J. A. (2016). Unbalanced international collaboration affects adversely the usefulness of countries’ scientific output as well as their technological and social impact. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1789–1814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Grieneisen, M. L. (2012). The impact of misconduct on the published medical and non-medical literature, and the news media. Scientometrics, 96(2), 573–587.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions and careful reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Key Project of Humanties and Social Sciences in Ministry of Education of China (No. 18JZD056), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Special Fund of Teaching and Scientific Research for Teachers in Liberal Arts, Zhejiang University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Resources Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, No. 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Qin Zhang & Hui-Zhen Fu

  2. Psychology Department, Faculty of Humanities, Bina Nusantara University, BINUS Kampus Kijang, Jl. Kemanggisan Ilir III No. 45, Palmerah, DKI Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia

    Juneman Abraham

Authors
  1. Qin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juneman Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui-Zhen Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Zhen Fu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Abraham, J. & Fu, HZ. Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–2017. Scientometrics 125, 213–232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation