Abstract
Psychology is one of the most productive social sciences in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. However, authors from CEE countries continue to publish their work in national scientific journals and limit scientific collaboration to their own national context more often than their Western colleagues. As a result, their contribution to psychological science is largely unknown to the global community. The current study analyzes trends in paper publication in CEE journals, published in CEE countries, and non-CEE psychology journals, published outside of CEE countries, in the period between 1996 and 2013, as well as differences between these two groups of papers. A total of 3846 papers published in 286 journals by CEE authors were extracted from the Scopus database and subsequently analyzed. Among all published papers, 53.2% were published in 14 CEE journals, while 46.7% of papers were published in 272 non-CEE journals. Several general findings emerged from the analyses: (1) In the period between 1996 and 2004, CEE psychologists published their papers more frequently in CEE journals; (2) after 2007, the number of scientific papers increased overall; (3) after 2011, the difference between CEE and non-CEE papers demonstrated a constant and growing trend in favor of non-CEE journals; (4) while the research topics of papers published in both groups were similar, significant differences were found in the methodology applied, where research that used advanced or complex methodology was more often published in non-CEE journals and single-author and review papers were more often published in CEE journals. The significance of these results for European cohesion processes are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
Research activity, collaboration and orientation in social sciences in Croatia and other post-socialist European countries (RACOSS—IP-09-2014-9351.
Scopus_ASJC: Scopus ASJC (All Science Journal Classification) https://rdrr.io/cran/CITAN/man/Scopus_ASJC.html (accessed 05-01-2019).
Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS), Classification in the Frascati Manual http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf (accessed 24-11-2018).
SJR: SCImago Journal Ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=3200&country=Eastern%20Europe (accessed 17-05-2019).
References
Adair, J. G., Coělho, A. E., & Luna, J. R. (2002). How international is psychology? International Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000351.
Bauserman, R. (1997). International representation in the psychological literature. International Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075997400908.
Bouillet, D., & Jokić, M. (2019). Characteristics of educational sciences research activity in European post-socialist countries in the period 1996–2013: Content analysis approach. European Educational Research Journal, 18(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119827462.
Cordón-García, J.A., Goméz-Díaz, R., Rodríguéz-García, A., Sánchez-Jara, J.M., Magas-Véga, A., Dantas, T., et.al. (Eds.) (2017). Proceedings of the 5th international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (TEEM 2017) (Article 30). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145380.
de Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4.
de Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005.
Gibbs, W. (1995). Lost Science in the Third World. Scientific American, 273(2), 92–99. www.jstor.org/stable/24981594. Accessed from June 1, 2020.
Havrylyshyn, O., Meng, X., & Tupy, M. L. (2016). 25 Years of Reforms in Ex-Communist Countries: Fast and Extensive Reforms Led to Higher Growth and More Political Freedom. Washington: Cato Institute.
Hicks, D. (2012). One size doesn’t fit all: on the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing. Confero, 1(1). https://works.bepress.com/diana_hicks/33. Accessed from June 1, 2020
Hogan, J. D., & Vaccaro, T. P. (2007). International perspectives on the history of psychology. In M. J. Stevens & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Toward a global psychology: Theory research intervention and pedagogy. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Hoogendoorn, G. (2008). Scopus: The continuing development of an abstract and citation database. The Serials Librarian, 55, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801970899.
Jaklič, A., Obloj, K., Svetličič, M., & Kronegger, L. (2020). Evolution of Central and Eastern Europe related international business research. Journal of Business Research, 108, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.046.
Jaklič, A., Rašković, M., & Schuch, A. (2018). Examining the contextual richness of Central and Eastern Europe. AIB Insights, 18(1), 3–6.
Janoušek, J., & Sirotkina, I. (2003). Psychology in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe. The Cambridge History of Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521594424.025.
Jokić, M. (2020). Productivity, visibility, authorship, and collaboration in library and information science journals: Central and Eastern European authors. Scientometrics, 122(2), 1189–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03308-4.
Jokić, M., Mervar, A., & Mateljan, S. (2018). Scientific potential of European fully open access journals. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1373–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2629-y.
Jokić, M., Mervar, A., & Mateljan, S. (2019a). Comparative analysis of book citations in social science journals by Central and Eastern European authors. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1005–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03176-y.
Jokić, M., Mervar, A., & Mateljan, S. (2019b). The development of political science in Central and Eastern Europe: Bibliometric perspective, 1996–2013. European Political Science, 18(3), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0191-6.
Jokić, M., Zauder, K., & Letina, S. (2009). Croatian scholarly productivity 1991–2005 measured bx journals indexed in web of science. Scientometrics, 83(2), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0071-5.
Jurajda, Š, Kozubek, S., Münich, D., & Škoda, S. (2017). Scientific publication performance in post-communist countries: Still lagging far behind. Scientometrics, 112(1), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2389-8.
Kovács, A., Kiss, D., Kassai, S., Pados, E., Kaló, Z., & Rácz, J. (2019). Mapping qualitative research in psychology across five Central-Eastern European countries: Contemporary trends—a paradigm analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(3), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605271.
Kozlowski, J., Radosevic, S., & Ircha, D. (1999). History matters: The inherited disciplinary structure of the post-communist science in countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Its restructuring. Scientometrics, 45(1), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458473.
Krampen, G., Huckert, T., & Schui, G. (2012). The impact of anglicizing former German-language psychology journals on authorship and citation frequencies. European Psychologist, 17(3), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000074.
Krampen, G., & Schui, G. (2009). ZPID-Monitor 2007 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht. Psychologische Rundschau, 60(3), 184–185. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.60.3.184.
Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T. C. E., Rozkosz, E. A., Zuccala, A. A., et al. (2020). Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A Seven-Country European Study. Journal or the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24336.
Leydesdorff, L., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V. P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21250.
Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of publications from post-Sovietcountries in psychological journals in 1992–2017. Scientometrics, 119, 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03087-y.
Mucha, J. (2009). Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe or East European sociology: Historical and Present. Sociológia, 41(6), 507–525. https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/07211211Mucha%20AF%20OK.pdf. Accessed from June 8, 2020.
Must, Ü. (2006). New countries in Europe—research, development and innovation strategies verses bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0016-1.
Packer, A. L., & Meneghini, R. (2007). Learning to communicate science in developing countries. Interciencia, 32(9), 643–647. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/339/33932912.pdf. Accessed from June 7, 2020
Pajić, D. (2015). Globalization of the social sciences in Eastern Europe: Genuine breakthrough or a slippery slope of the research evaluation practice? Scientometrics, 102(3), 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1510-5.
Pajić, D., & Jevremov, T. (2014). Globaly national—locally international: Bibliometric analysis of a SEE psychology journal. Psihologija, 47(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1402263P.
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1992). Designing and conducting survey research. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Boss.
Reņģe, V., & Dragūns, J. G. (2012). Psychology in Latvia: Its origins, development, and current state. European Psychologist, 17(3), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000057.
Sangwal, K. (2013). Some citation-related characteristics of scientific journals published in individual countries. Scientometrics, 97(3), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1053-1.
Slišković, A., & Maslić Seršić, D. (2011). Work stress among university teachers: Gender and position differences. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 62(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-62-2011-2135.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.11. CWTS Meaningful Metrics, Universiteit Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.11.pdf. Accessed from February 12, 2020
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003.
White, K. D., Dalgleish, L., & Arnold, G. (1982). Authorship patterns in psychology: National and international trends. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(4), 190–192. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334812.
Zgrabljić Rotar, D., Jokić, M., & Mateljan, S. (2018). The visibility of papers written by authors from European post-socialist countries as an indicator of integration into the EU legal system. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 14(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.14.2018.304.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the Project IP 2014-09-9351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no Conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seršić, D.M., Martinčević, M. & Jokić, M. The contribution of CEE authors to psychological science: a comparative analysis of papers published in CEE and non-CEE journals indexed by Scopus in the period 1996—2013. Scientometrics 126, 1453–1469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03784-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03784-z