Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can emerging economies take advantage of their population size to gain international academic recognition? Evidence from key universities in China

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is there a demographic dividend in scientific research akin to economic development? Can an increasing number of researchers gain recognition in the international academic community? By integrating social network theory and social identity theory, we propose three constructs, namely academic participation, government support and international reputation, to analyze the relationship between S&T human scale and international academic recognition. Based on the panel data of universities directly under the Ministry of Education in China, we use the natural logarithm of the ratio between the number of scholars sent by universities and the number actually received by foreign universities to measure the international academic recognition. The results showed that: (1) Currently, Chinese universities cannot gain recognition from the international academic community by virtue of the size advantage of their S&T personnel. (2) The key to gaining international academic recognition is to encourage R&D personnel to actively participate in international academic activities and produce high-quality research results, while S&T service personnel mainly play a supporting role. (3) The government needs to formulate more precise support policies for international cooperation as well as guide researchers and S&T service personnel to play their roles in different categories, which may enhance the international recognition of Chinese scholars. (4) Chinese scholars should actively cooperate with internationally renowned scholars to produce high-level research results, and thus improve the international visibility of Chinese scholars. This can not only largely weaken the negative relationship between S&T human scale and international academic recognition, but also conduce to realizing the scale advantage of Chinese S&T personnel. Our conclusions further expand the boundary of legitimacy in institutional theory, and clarify the potential inapplicability of scale advantage in scientific research, which can provide an important reference for policy makers and university administrators to improve human resource policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data source: http://retractiondatabase.org/RetractionSearch.aspx?.

  2. We are very grateful to the reviewer for this enlightening thought and suggestion.

References

  • Abt, H. A. (2007). The frequencies of multinational papers in various sciences. Scientrometrics, 72(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2012). Collaborations: The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 335–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance— An international comparison. Research Policy, 39, 822–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., Glaeser, E. L., & Murphy, K. M. (1999). Population and economic growth. American Economic Review, 89(2), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenzon, S., & Schankerman, M. (2015). Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 795–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Rand Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, R. M., Chykina, V., & Jones, J. J. (2017). Social network effects on academic achievement. The Social Science Journal, 54(4), 438–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, J., & Roper, S. (2017). Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects. Research Policy, 46(8), 1505–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2010). Reconsidering the reputation—performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q. (2020). Contradiction between input and output of Chinese scientific research: A multidimensional analysis. Scientometrics, 123(1), 451–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Xie, P., Jiao, M., & Duan, W. (2021). The larger scientific and technological human scale, the better innovation effect? Evidence from key universities in China. Scientometrics, 126(7), 5623–5649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carboni, O. A. (2017). The effect of public support on investment and R&D: An empirical evaluation on European manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q. (2014). Advanced econometrics and stata applications. Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34, 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, C. O., Block, J. H., & Sandner, P. G. (2016). Chinese university patents: Quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: An analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2(3), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, H., & Peng, S. (2018). Effects of patent policy on innovation outputs and commercialization: Evidence from universities in China. Scientometrics, 117, 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Brambila, C. N., Veloso, F. M., & Krackhardt, D. (2013). The impact of network embeddedness on research output. Research Policy, 42(9), 1555–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, H., & Kalthaus, M. (2018). International research networks: Determinants of country embeddedness. Research Policy, 47(7), 1198–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriou, K., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2014). Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. Journal of Management, 40(2), 586–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadani, M., Coombes, S., Das, D., & Jalajas, D. (2012). Finding a good job: Academic network centrality and early occupational outcomes in management academia. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, T. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1/2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, Y. C., & Kim, T. Y. (2019). Between legitimacy and efficiency: An institutional theory of corporate giving. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1583–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers, K., & Cruz-Castro, L. (2013). Research upon return: The effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact. Research Policy, 42(8), 1366–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A., Sáenz, J., & Aramburu, N. (2017). Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 81, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, L. Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2015). Country variations in different innovation outputs: The interactive effect of institutional support and human capital. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(7), 1050–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., Yang, H., & Arya, B. (2009). Alliance partners and firm performance: Resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K. (2014). Human capital, social collaboration, and patent renewal within U.S. pharmaceutical firms. Journal of Management, 40(2), 616–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Mei, S. (2015). How can an indigenous concept enter the international academic circle: The case of guanxi. Scientometrics, 105(1), 645–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M. G., Zouaghi, F., & Garcia, M. S. (2017). Capturing value from alliance portfolio diversity: The mediating role of R&D human capital in high and low tech industries. Technovation, 59, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C. J. (2008). Intra-EU vs extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, M. A., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. M., & Cooper, E. (1993). Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 518–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, B. B. (2005). The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1194–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S., & Smith, N. H. (2012). Recognition theory as social research. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orazbayev, S. (2017). International knowledge flows and the administrative barriers to mobility. Research Policy, 46(9), 1655–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payumo, J., Sutton, T., Brown, D., Nordquist, D., Evans, M., Moore, D., & Arasu, P. (2017). Input–output analysis of international research collaborations: A case study of five US universities. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1657–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C., Heidl, R., & Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, S. (2017). Rights, responsibilities and regulation of international business. In Globalization and International Investment. London, New York: Routledge.

  • Pilbeam, C., Lloyd-Jones, G., & Denyer, D. (2013). Leveraging value in doctoral student networks through social capital. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1472–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, S., Liu, X., & Gao, T. (2017). Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms. Research Policy, 46(7), 1299–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, S. A. (2011). Academic identity: A modern perspective. Educate, 11(1), 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2003). International experience and academic careers: What do academics have to say? Personnel Review, 32(6), 774–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarazzati, S., & Wang, L. (2019). The effect of collaborations on scientific research output: The case of nanoscience in Chinese regions. Scientometrics, 121(2), 839–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1988). Social network analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2015). Magnets and seekers: A network perspective on academic integration inside two residential communities. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 893–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China-US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tejada, G., Hercog, M., Kuptsch, C., & Bolay, J.-C. (2014). The link with a home country: A Comparative analysis of host country environments for diaspora engagement. In S. Sahoo & B. K. Pattanaik (Eds.), Global diasporas and development: Socio-economic, cultural and policy perspectives (pp. 39–68). New Delhi: Springer India.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzabbar, D., & Vestal, A. (2015). Bridging the social chasm in geographically distributed R&D teams: The moderating effects of relational strength and status asymmetry on the novelty of team innovation. Organization Science, 26(3), 811–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Mukherjee, S. (2019). International research collaboration: Novelty, conventionality, and atypicality in knowledge recombination. Research Policy, 48(5), 1260–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Xu, S. M., Liu, D., & Liang, Y. X. (2012). The role of Chinese-American scientists in China-US scientific collaboration: A study in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 91(3), 737–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Xu, S., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A. (2017). The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, Q., Cao, Q., & Tan, M. (2020). Basic research intensity and diversified performance: The moderating role of government support intensity. Scientometrics, 125(1), 577–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youtie, J., Rogers, J., Heinze, T., Shapira, P., & Tang, L. (2013). Career-based influences on scientific recognition in the United States and Europe: Longitudinal evidence from curriculum vitae data. Research Policy, 42(8), 1341–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., Bao, C., Li, J., Wu, D., Hao, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Who are the international research collaboration partners for China? A novel data perspective based on NSFC grants. Scientometrics, 116(1), 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J., Phan, C. A., & Matsui, Y. (2015). The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Rollins, J. E., & Lipitakis, E. (2018). China’s emerging centrality in the contemporary international scientific collaboration network. Scientometrics, 116(2), 1075–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W., & Ritchie, J. B. (2007). An investigation of academic leadership in tourism research: 1985–2004. Tourism Management, 28(2), 476–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Glänzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82(3), 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China

    Qinwei Cao

  2. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China

    Manqing Tan & Peng Xie

  3. School of Management, Xi’an Polytechnic University, Xi’an, 710048, Shaanxi, China

    Jian Huang

Authors
  1. Qinwei Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manqing Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Q., Tan, M., Xie, P. et al. Can emerging economies take advantage of their population size to gain international academic recognition? Evidence from key universities in China. Scientometrics 127, 927–957 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04218-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04218-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation