Abstract
Patents not only promote the dissemination of technological knowledge through the disclosure of innovative information, but restrict the use of patented technology by the public within the scope of the law. With this exclusive protection on the premise of information disclosure, it is ambiguous whether patents help or hinder the diffusion of knowledge within the span of patents. This study first constructs a multidimensional index of patented technological knowledge diffusion (PTKD) from spatiotemporal aspects, and compares the differences in technological knowledge diffusion of four types of patents—valid patent (VP), zero-cited patent before expiration (Z-B), zero-cited patent after expiration (Z-A), and non-zero-cited patent before and after expiration (NZ-BA). Then, the impact of patent protection—patent lifetime (PL), the number of independent claims (NIC), the number of words in the first independent claim (NWF)—on the degree of PTKD is explored. The results demonstrate that NZ-BA has the highest level of PTKD in terms of growth rate, technological and geographical breadth and depth, followed by VP. Meanwhile, PL affects the diffusion growth rate and technological and geographical breadth negatively, NIC positively affects the diffusion average speed and technological and geographical depth while NWF only positively affects the technological depth of diffusion. These findings highlight the role of different types of patents in promoting technological innovation and promote a better understanding of the correlation between patent protection and PTKD, which provides support for decision-makers to protect property protection and guides the patentees to protect their long-term economic and technological benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data and materials support our published claims and comply with field standards.
Code availability
All software application or custom code support our published claims and comply with field standards.
References
Bahar, M., & Griesbach, R. J. (2019). To protect or not to protect: Guide for deciding on public release or intellectual property protection of new plant cultivars and germplasm. Hortscience, 54(4), 763. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci13528-18
Balland, P.-A., & Rigby, D. (2017). The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947
Baruffaldi, S. H., & Simeth, M. (2020). Patents and knowledge diffusion: The effect of early disclosure. Research Policy, 49(4), 103927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103927
Chirico, F., Criaco, G., Bau, M., Naldi, L., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Kotlar, J. (2020). To patent or not to patent: That is the question Intellectual property protection in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718806251
Choe, H., Lee, D. H., Kim, H. D., & Seo, I. W. (2016). Structural properties and inter-organizational knowledge flows of patent citation network: The case of organic solar cells. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.150
Choi, J., Jeong, B., Yoon, J., Coh, B.-Y., & Lee, J.-M. (2020). A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties: A machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 145, 106544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106544
Choi, Y. M., & Cho, D. (2018). A study on the time-dependent changes of the intensities of factors determining patent lifespan from a biological perspective. World Patent Information, 54, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.05.006
Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., & Galli, S. (2012). Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? MPRA Paper, 56(4), 727–746.
Chu, A. C., Furukawa, Y., Mallick, S., Pere Tt, O., & P., & Wang, X. (2019). Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a schumpeterian economy. MPRA Paper, 71(4), 1–37.
Deng, P., Lu, H., Hong, J., Chen, Q., & Yang, Y. (2019). Government R&D subsidies, intellectual property rights protection and innovation. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2), 363–378.
Dong, H., Chen, D., & Huang, M. (2019). Are invalid patents still cited? Proceedings of the Association for Information Ence and Technology, 56(1), 639–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.117
Dusa, P., Purice, E., Nagit, G., Dodun, O., Ripanu, M., & Slatineanu, L. (2017). Construction of patent claims using axiomatic design. In MATEC web of conferences
Ernst, H., Conley, J., & Omland, N. (2016). How to create commercial value from patents: The role of patent management. R & D Management, 46, 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12210
Fisch, C., Sandner, P., & Regner, L. (2017). The value of Chinese patents: An empirical investigation of citation lags. China Economic Review, 45, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.011
Fischer, T., & Leidinger, J. (2014). Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value: An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions. Research Policy, 43(3), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.013
Frakes, M. D., & Wasserman, M. F. (2014). The failed promise of user fees: Empirical evidence from the us patent and trademark office. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 602–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12051
Furman, J. L., Nagler, M., & Watzinger, M. (2018). Disclosure and subsequent innovation: Evidence from the patent depository library program. Social Science Electronic Publishing NBER Working Paper, w24660.
Galasso, A., & Schankerman, M. (2015). Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 317–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju029
Gattari, P. (2013). The role of patent law in incentivizing green technology. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 11(2), 42–45.
Gollin, M. (2008). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Nature, 454(7201), 164–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/454164a
Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters, 69(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(00)00265-2
Henkel, J., & Zischka, H. (2019). How many patents are truly valid? Extent, causes, and remedies for latent patent invalidity. European Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 195–239.
Hikkerova, L., Kammoun, N., & Lantz, J.-S. (2014). Patent life cycle: New evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.005
Jolly, A. (2009). The handbook of European intellectual property management. Kogan Page, 24(12), 2720–2727.
Karakilic, E. (2019). Rethinking intellectual property rights in the cognitive and digital age of capitalism: An autonomist Marxist reading. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.007
Kuhn, J. M., & Thompson, N. C. (2019). How to measure and draw causal inferences with patent scope. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 26(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2018.1553284
Kyungchul, C., Changseok, K., & Juneseuk, & Shin. (2015). Differential effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic performance: A cross-industry investigation. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 827–840.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696401
Lee, C., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2021). Anticipating multi-technology convergence: A machine learning approach using patent information. Scientometrics, 126(3), 1867–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03842-6
Lee, J., & Sohn, S. Y. (2017). What makes the first forward citation of a patent occur earlier? Scientometrics, 113(1), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2480-1
Lee, Y.-G. (2008). Patent licensability and life: A study of US patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics, 75(3), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1879-5
Liu, J., Ye, X., & Liu, Y. (2013). Study on the effect of international knowledge flows on the industry innovation performance in china. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(10), 1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2013.1669.1676
Liu, L., Cao, C., & Song, M. (2014). China’s agricultural patents: How has their value changed amid recent patent boom? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.018
Liu, W., Tan, R., Li, Z., Cao, G., & Yu, F. (2021). A patent-based method for monitoring the development of technological innovations based on knowledge diffusion. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2019-0502
Ma, D., Yu, D., Li, J., & Ge, M. (2021). Innovation diffusion enabler or barrier: An investigation of international patenting based on temporal exponential random graph models. Technology in Society, 64, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101456
Marco, A. C., Sarnoff, J. D., & DeGrazia, C. A. W. (2019). Patent claims and patent scope. Research Policy, 48(9), 103790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.014
Maskell, P. (2014). Accessing remote knowledge-the roles of trade fairs, pipelines, crowdsourcing and listening posts. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(5), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu002
Melero, E., Palomeras, N., & Wehrheim, D. (2020). The effect of patent protection on inventor mobility. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3500
Melo, P., & Maravilhas, S. (2019). Patent documentation as a source of innovation for sustainable development. Risus-Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 10(4), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2019v10i4p16-26
Moser, P. (2011). Do patents weaken the localization of innovations? Evidence from world’s fairs. Journal of Economic History, 71(2), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050711001562
Nemlioglu, I. (2019). A comparative analysis of intellectual property rights: A case of developed versus developing countries. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 988–998.
Okada, Y., Naito, Y., & Nagaoka, S. (2018). Making the patent scope consistent with the invention: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 27(3), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12266
Pakes, A. (1986). Patent as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica, 54(4), 755–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912835
Park, I., Jeong, Y., & Yoon, B. (2017). Analyzing the value of technology based on the differences of patent citations between applicants and examiners. Scientometrics, 111(2), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2323-0
Park, T.-Y., Lim, H., & Ji, I. (2018). Identifying potential users of technology for technology transfer using patent citation analysis: A case analysis of a Korean research institute. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1541–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2792-9
Pavan Dornelles, J. (2020). Why are they hiding? Patent secrecy and patenting strategies. Innovation-Organization & Management, 22(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1685886
Qiao, Y., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Huang, Y., & Yang, X. (2019). Citation behavior differences between patent applicants and examiners from the perspective of technology diversity. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 21(1), 97–102.
Rassenfosse, G. D., & Higham, K. (2021). Decentralising the patent system. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101559.
Rosiello, A., & Maleki, A. (2021). A dynamic multi-sector analysis of technological catch-up: The impact of technology cycle times, knowledge base complexity and variety. Research Policy, 50(3), 104194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104194
Rousseau, R. (2005). Robert fairthorne and the empirical power laws. Journal of Documentation, 61(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510585188
Sampat, B., & Williams, H. L. (2019). How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the human genome. American Economic Review, 109(1), 203–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151398
Serrano, C. J. (2010). The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents. Rand Journal of Economics, 41(4), 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00117.x
Sharma, P., & Tripathi, R. C. (2017). Patent citation: A technique for measuring the knowledge flow of information and innovation. World Patent Information, 51, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.11.002
Shilong, L., & Pengtao, W. (2020). Value evaluation and application research based on semantic analysis of patent claims: A case study of blockchain. World Sci-Tech r&d, 42(2), 233–244.
Smojver, V., Storga, M., & Zovak, G. (2021). Exploring knowledge flow within a technology domain by conducting a dynamic analysis of a patent co-citation network. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(2), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0079
Sofka, W., de Faria, P., & Shehu, E. (2018). Protecting knowledge: How legal requirements to reveal information affect the importance of secrecy. Research Policy, 47(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.016
Somaya, D. (2012). Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312444447
Son, S., & Cho, N.-W. (2020). Technology fusion characteristics in the solar photovoltaic industry of South Korea: A patent network analysis using IPC co-occurrence. Sustainability, 12(21), 9084. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219084
Song, K., Kim, K., & Lee, S. (2018). Identifying promising technologies using patents: A retrospective feature analysis and a prospective needs analysis on outlier patents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.008
Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). Economic foundations of intellectual property rights. Duke Law Journal, 57(6), 1693–1724.
Suzuki, K. (2020). Patent protection, optimal licensing, and innovation with endogenous entry. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(8), 2033–2059. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100519000099
Tee, W.-S., Chin, L., & Abdul-Rahim, A. S. (2021). Determinants of renewable energy production: Do intellectual property rights matter? Energies, 14(18), 5707. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185707
Ullah, A., Zhang, Q., & Ahmed, M. (2021). The influence of intellectual property rights protection on contribution efforts of participants in online crowdsourcing contests. Computers in Human Behavior, 123(2), 106869.
Veugelers, R., & Schneider, C. (2018). Which IP strategies do young highly innovative firms choose? Small Business Economics, 50(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9898-y
Wittfoth, S. (2019). Measuring technological patent scope by semantic analysis of patent claims: An indicator for valuating patents. World Patent Information, 58, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2019.101906
Xiang, J., Ma, F., & Wang, H. (2021). The effect of intellectual property treaties on international innovation collaboration: A study based on USPTO patents during 1976–2017. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-08-2020-0202
Xing, G. A., Mca, B., Ty, C., & Abd, E. (2020). Transport development, intellectual property rights protection and innovation: The case of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China - ScienceDirect. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37, 100563.
Yu, D., & Sheng, L. (2020). Knowledge diffusion paths of blockchain domain: The main path analysis. Scientometrics, 125(1), 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03650-y
Zheng, Q., Huang, L., Wu, F., Dan, W., & Hui, Z. (2017). Analyzing technological knowledge diffusion among technological fields using patent data: The example of microfluidics. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(1), 1740004. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877017400041
Zhou, Y., Pan, M., & Urban, F. (2018). Comparing the international knowledge flow of China’s wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) industries: Patent analysis and implications for sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(6), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061883
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the 68th General Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [Grant Number: 2020M683150], the Soft Science Project of Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, China [Grant Number: 2019B101001024], National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Number: 72104256], and Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science [Grant Number: GD21YTS02].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SH: conceived and designed the analysis, collected the data, contributed data or analysis tools, performed the analysis, wrote the paper. HJ: conceived and designed the analysis, performed the analysis, wrote the paper, supervision. ZY: writing—reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Ethics approval
All of the authors appropriate approvals.
Consent to participate (include appropriate statements)
All of the authors consent to participate.
Consent for publication (include appropriate statements)
All of the authors consent for publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, H., Hou, J. & Zhang, Y. Patent protection: does it promote or inhibit the patented technological knowledge diffusion?. Scientometrics 127, 2351–2379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04348-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04348-z