Abstract
The Microeconomic Theory by (Mas-Colell et al., Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995) has become the standard microeconomics textbook in economics PhD programs shortly after its publication. Despite 25 years having passed since the first and only edition, the textbook is still used predominantly in these programs. In this paper, we investigate the citation performance of the references in the textbook after 1995. We selected a comparison group of publications that have similar citation performance as the references in the textbook before 1995. We find that the references in the textbook have performed better than the comparison group of publications after 1995. Therefore, we conclude that one of the reasons for the success of the textbook might the careful choice of its references.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The survey was conducted in March–April 2021. The e-mail addresses of the students were easily accessible as economics PhD programs typically make the contact information of students on the job market publicly available.
The Shanghai 2020 economics subject ranking can be accessed at < shanghairanking.com/Shanghairanking-Subject-Rankings/economics.html > .
We received responses from 15 students who were selected first, 8 students who were selected second, and 7 students that were selected third to fifth. There were two institutions where we ran out of students and had to send e-mails multiple times.
References
Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., & Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27–34.
Card, D., & DellaVigna, S. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 144–161.
Colander, D. (2005). What economists teach and what economists do. The Journal of Economic Education, 36(3), 249–260.
Cole, C., Davis, A. R., Eyer, V., & Meier, J. J. (2018). Google Scholar’s coverage of the engineering Literature 10 years later. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 419–425.
De Winter, J. C. F., Zadpoor, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2014). The expansion of google scholar versus web of science: A longitudnal study. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1547–1565.
Johnston, D. W., Piatti, M., & Torgler, B. (2013). Citation success over time: Theory or empirics? Scientometrics, 95(3), 1023–1029.
Korom, P. (2018). Does scientific eminence endure? Making sense of the most cited economists, psychologists and sociologists in textbooks (1970–2010). Scientometrics, 116(2), 909–939.
Kosteas, V. D. (2018). Predicting long-run citation counts for articles in top economics journals. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1395–1412.
Liner, G. H. (2002). Core journals in economics. Economic Inquiry, 40(1), 138–145.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press.
Rubinstein, A. (2005). Lecture notes in microeconomic theory: The economic agent. Princeton University Press.
Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225.
Yuret, T. (2019). Citation performance of thirty keywords in economics. Applied Economics Letters, 26(14), 1167–1170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yuret, T. The citation performance of the references in the standard graduate-level microeconomics textbook: Mas-Collel et al. (1995). Scientometrics 128, 1473–1484 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04650-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04650-4