Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of financial incentives on R&D performance in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) by analyzing the number of papers published in Saudi-based universities and research institutes in seven sectors for 25 years (1995–2019). It discusses how policies influence R&D performance and examines how financial incentives are associated with research output, quantitatively and qualitatively. The current study aims to provide R&D organizations with insights to make informed decisions concerning the role of incentives in boosting R&D production. Specifically, the current paper targets to answer the question: Did the Saudi Amended Incentive Program (promulgated in 2008) improve research production, i.e., lead to a higher number of published papers? The paper analyzed historical data of scientific publications in the KSA to answer the raised question, compared with MENA and G20 countries. The year 2009 did mark a clear turning point in the KSA’s R&D performance in terms of the number of published scientific papers that have risen steadily and multiplied seven times between 2009 and 2019. The study also provides empirical evidence of the effectiveness of governmental regulations and financial incentive schemes in increasing the number of papers published in various scientific fields.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It should be clarified here that the GII looks at the quality of scientific papers according to the (Hirch) Index, while this study used Nature in the previous credit, both of which are commonly used indicators to measure the quality of scientific papers.
The GII divides the number of scientific papers by the gross national product when countries are ranked in the number of articles in scientific and technical fields, while this study divides the number of scientific papers by the population, causing a difference in the two results.
References
AlRiyadh Newspaper. (2008). The Council of Ministers approves the amended regulations for the affairs of university employees. Retrieved January 27, 2023, https://www.alriyadh.com/371605
Álvarez-Bornstein, B., & Bordons, M. (2021). Is funding related to higher research impact? Exploring its relationship and the mediating role of collaboration in several disciplines. Journal of Informetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101102
Arab News. (2021). Improved global rankings reflect strides being made by Saudi universities. Retrieved January 27, 2023 https://www.arabnews.com/node/1812221/saudi-arabia
Amara, N., Landry, R., & Halilem, N. (2015). What can university administrators do to increase the publication and citation scores of their faculty members? Scientometrics, 103(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1537-2
Andreeva, T., Garanina, T., Sáenz, J., Aramburu, N., & Kianto, A. (2021). Does country environment matter in the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation performance? Journal of Business Research, 136, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.038
Balietti, S., & Riedl, C. (2021). Incentives, competition, and inequality in markets for creative production. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104212
Bloch, C., Sørensen, M. P., Graversen, E. K., Schneider, J. W., Schmidt, E. K., Aagaard, K., & Mejlgaard, N. (2014). Developing a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 43, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.005
Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2015). “open” disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Research Policy, 44(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.001
Campbell, D., Picard-Aitken, M., Côté, G., Caruso, J., Valentim, R., Edmonds, S., et al. (2010). Bibliometrics as a performance measurement tool for research evaluation: The case of research funded by the national cancer institute of Canada. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009354774
CEIC. (2020). Saudi Arabia. Retrieved January 27, 2021, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/country/saudi-arabia
Cirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. World Bank Publications.
Costas, R., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2012). Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1647–1661. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22692
Crespi, G., Giuliodori, D., Giuliodori, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2016). The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D+i in developing countries: The case of Argentina. Research Policy, 45(10), 2023–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.006
Elsevier B.V. (2022). What is Field-weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)?. Retrieved February 6, 2022, https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14894/supporthub/scopus/~/what-is-field-weighted-citation-impact-%28fwci%29%3F/
ETEC. (2023). About Education and Training Evaluation Commission (ETEC). Retrieved January 28, 2023, https://etec.gov.sa/en/About/Pages/default.aspx
European Commission. (2020). Horizon Policy Support Facility. Retrieved December 27, 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/statistics/policy-support-facility
Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. (2006). The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 35(10), 1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.019
Fu, X. (2012). How does openness affect the importance of incentives for innovation? Research Policy, 41(3), 512–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.011
General Authority for Statistics. (2023). Population Estimates in the Midyear of 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2023, https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/43
Guan, J., & Zuo, K. (2014). A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency. Scientometrics, 100(2), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1288-5
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004
Derwent Innovation. (2021). Derwent Innovation. Retrieved January 5, 2022, https://clarivate.com/derwent/
KACST, & MoEP. (2009). Strategic Technology Program Summary Document.
King Saud University. (2018). King Saud University Award for Scientific Excellence. Retrieved January 28, 2023, https://dsrs.ksu.edu.sa/sites/dsrs.ksu.edu.sa/files/imce_images/lyh_jyz_jm_lmlk_swd_lltmyz_llmy_1439.pdf
Knoema. (2020). Saudi Arabia. World Data Atlas. Retrieved December 27, 2021, https://knoema.com/atlas/Saudi-Arabia
Lokshin, B., & Mohnen, P. (2013). Do R&D tax incentives lead to higher wages for R&D workers? Evidence from the Netherlands. Research Policy, 42(3), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.004
Ministry of Education. (2021). Data and Statistics. Retrieved January 5, 2022, https://www.moe.gov.sa/en/knowledgecenter/dataandstats/Pages/infoandstats.aspx
MoE. (2022). Saudi Arabia now has 14 universities in the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2022 That number is an improvement from the nine universities listed in 2019. Retrieved January 27, 2023, https://www.moe.gov.sa/en/mediacenter/MOEnews/Pages/QS-Uni-Ranking.aspx
Möller, T., Schmidt, M., & Hornbostel, S. (2016). Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 109(3), 2217–2239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2090-3
Montmartin, B., & Herrera, M. (2015). Internal and external effects of R and D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy, 44(5), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
Moretti, E., & Wilson, D. J. (2014). State incentives for innovation, star scientists and jobs: Evidence from biotech. Journal of Urban Economics, 79, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2013.07.002
Nature Index. (2021). Nature Index. Retrieved January 5, 2022, https://www.natureindex.com/
Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009
Saudi Gazette. (2022). 21 Saudi universities listed in Times education rankings 2023; 40% increase compared to 2022. Retrieved January 27, 2023, https://saudigazette.com.sa/article/625934
Saudi Press Agency. (2009b). KFUPM enters Times Higher Education-QS University Ranking. Retrieved January 27, 2023, https://www.spa.gov.sa/646449?lang=ar&newsid=646449
Saudi Press Agency. (2009a). Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques approves the regulations and standards of payment of Allowances, Remunerations and Benefits to the Academic Staff in Universities. Retrieved December 27, 2021, https://www.spa.gov.sa/632556
Scival. (2022). Elsevier. Retrieved February 6, 2021 https://www.scival.com/
The Global Economy. (2020). Saudi Arabia Economic Indicators. Retrieved December 27, 2021, https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Saudi-Arabia/
Trochim, W. M., Marcus, S. E., Mâsse, L. C., Moser, R. P., & Weld, P. C. (2008). The evaluation of large research initiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007309280
Ubfal, D., & Maffioli, A. (2011). The impact of funding on research collaboration: Evidence from a developing country. Research Policy, 40(9), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.023
UIS. (2020). The UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved December 27, 2021, http://uis.unesco.org/
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0362-5
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727
WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019. Retrieved December 27, 2021, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019.pdf
WIPO. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: Saudi Arabia. Retrieved January 28, 2023, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_2000_2022/sa.pdf
Yang, C. H., Huang, C. H., & Hou, T. C. T. (2012). Tax incentives and R & D activity: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(9), 1578–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.006
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) for supporting this study; and the Research, Development and Innovation Observatory for data gathering and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
AlShareef, M.R., Alrammah, I.A., Alshoukani, N.A. et al. The impact of financial incentives on research production: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Scientometrics 128, 3067–3089 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04692-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04692-8